Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/344,553

UCI MULTIPLEXING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Priority
Dec 31, 2020 — CN 202011623201.9 +1 more
Examiner
ZAIDI, IQBAL
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1094 granted / 1211 resolved
+32.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1245
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.0%
+20.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1211 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The instant application having application No 18/344,533 filed on 10/15/2025 is presented for examination by the examiner. Response to Argument Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 5, 11-16, 20 and 26-30 have been considered. However, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant’s arguments and would like to provide a further clarification regarding the interpretation of the cited references. In response to the argument on page 15 of Applicant’s Remark, “determining, according to a quantity of at least some resources of the first PUSCH, a quantity of resources occupied by the first UCI in the first PUSCH”. In fact, Examiner interprets the “The UE perform multiplexing of UCI in at least one of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed. When the UE multiplexes UCI with PUSCH transmission in a plurality of slots, the UE may configure the numbers of bits of UCI to be the same. Specifically, when the UE multiplexes UCI with PUSCH transmission in a plurality of slots, the UE may configure the number of bits of all pieces of UCI multiplexed with PUSCH transmission as the maximum number of bits of UCI, among the UCI multiplexed with PUSCH transmission”. according to CHOI’s disclosure. As stated in CHOI’s – page 21, par (0166), line 1-10, The UE perform multiplexing of UCI in at least one of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed. When the UE multiplexes UCI with PUSCH transmission in a plurality of slots, the UE configure the numbers of bits of UCI to be the same, when the UE multiplexes UCI with PUSCH transmission in a plurality of slots, the UE configure the number of bits of all pieces of UCI multiplexed with PUSCH transmission as the maximum number of bits of UCI, among the UCI multiplexed with PUSCH transmission. whereas the Examiner wants to provide further clarification of the cited claim limitation, whereas the CHOI’s is directed to “page 13-14, par (0139), line 1-20, the UE repeatedly transmit a PUSCH according to the indicated time and frequency resource allocation information. If the UE transmits a PUSCH over a plurality of slots, and if PUSCH transmission including UCI in the slot in which the PUSCH is transmitted, the UE multiplex the UCI with the PUSCH transmission, thereby transmitting the PUSCH. Therefore, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant's arguments. Thus, CHOI’s and Li’s disclosure still covers the limitations of claims 1, 5, 11-16, 20 and 26-30. Therefore, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant's arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 5, 15-16 and 19-20 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Li et al. (U.S 20210337538, Oct.28, 2021) in view of CHOI et al. (US 20210092762, Mar. 25, 2021). Regarding Claim 1, Li discloses an uplink control information (UCI) multiplexing method, performed by a terminal, the method comprising multiplexing (page 11, par (0130), line 1-10, multiplexing uplink control information for transmission performed by a base station and UE (performed by terminal)), in a case that a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) and a first physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) at least partially overlap in time domain (page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, Uplink control information (UCI) carried on a PUCCH includes HARQ-ACK information, channel state information (CSI), and a scheduling request (SR). After a PUCCH #1 and a PUCCH #2 overlap in time domain, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, when the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH overlap in time domain, also see par (0053), When time domain symbols corresponding to two time-frequency resources are partially the same, it is considered that the two time-frequency resources partially overlap in time domain), first UCI carried by the first PUCCH on the first PUSCH for transmission (page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, When the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH). Li discloses all aspects of the claimed invention, except the first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot. CHOI is the same field of invention teaches the first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot (page 15, par (0146), line 1-10, the UE multiplex HARQ-ACK with PUSCH transmission in all of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed). Li and CHOI l analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor of access to a service device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot the teaching of Li to include the UE multiplex HARQ-ACK with PUSCH transmission in all of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed the teaching of CHOI because it is providing efficiently multiplexing uplink control information in a wireless communication system and an apparatus using the same. Regarding Claim 2, Li discloses determining, according to a quantity of at least some resources of the first PUSCH, a quantity of resources occupied by the first UCI in the first PUSCH (page 13, par (0154), line 1-10, UE select a PUSCH resource to perform UCI multiplex transmission). Regarding Claim 5, Li discloses determining, depending on whether the first PUCCH is a repetition transmission, a quantity of times of the repetition transmission of the first UCI on the first PUSCH (page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, When the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH). Regarding Claim 15, Li discloses a terminal, comprising: a processor, a memory, and a program stored on the memory and runnable on the processor, wherein the program, when being executed by the processor, implements multiplexing (page 11, par (0130), line 1-10, multiplexing uplink control information for transmission performed by a base station and UE (performed by terminal)), in a case that a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) and a first physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) at least partially overlap in time domain (page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, Uplink control information (UCI) carried on a PUCCH includes HARQ-ACK information, channel state information (CSI), and a scheduling request (SR). After a PUCCH #1 and a PUCCH #2 overlap in time domain, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, when the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH overlap in time domain, also see par (0053), When time domain symbols corresponding to two time-frequency resources are partially the same, it is considered that the two time-frequency resources partially overlap in time domain). Li discloses all aspects of the claimed invention, except first UCI carried by the first PUCCH on the first PUSCH for transmission, wherein the first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot. CHOI is the same field of invention teaches first UCI carried by the first PUCCH on the first PUSCH for transmission, wherein CHOI is the same field of invention teaches the first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot (page 15, par (0146), line 1-10, the UE multiplex HARQ-ACK with PUSCH transmission in all of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed). Li and CHOI l analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor of access to a service device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot the teaching of Li to include the UE multiplex HARQ-ACK with PUSCH transmission in all of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed the teaching of CHOI because it is providing efficiently multiplexing uplink control information in a wireless communication system and an apparatus using the same. Regarding Claim 16, Li discloses the program, when being executed by the processor, further implements determining, according to a quantity of at least some resources of the first PUSCH, a quantity of resources occupied by the first UCI in the first PUSCH (page 13, par (0154), line 1-10, UE select a PUSCH resource to perform UCI multiplex transmission). Regarding Claim 19, Li discloses the program, when being executed by the processor, further implements determining, depending on whether the first PUCCH is a repetition transmission, a quantity of times of the repetition transmission of the first UCI on the first PUSCH(page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, When the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH). Regarding Claim 20, Li discloses a non-transitory readable storage medium, storing a program or instructions, wherein the program or the instructions, when being executed by a processor, implements multiplexing (page 11, par (0130), line 1-10, multiplexing uplink control information for transmission performed by a base station and UE (performed by terminal)), in a case that a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) and a first physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) at least partially overlap in time domain (page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, Uplink control information (UCI) carried on a PUCCH includes HARQ-ACK information, channel state information (CSI), and a scheduling request (SR). After a PUCCH #1 and a PUCCH #2 overlap in time domain, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, when the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH overlap in time domain, also see par (0053), When time domain symbols corresponding to two time-frequency resources are partially the same, it is considered that the two time-frequency resources partially overlap in time domain). first UCI carried by the first PUCCH on the first PUSCH for transmission (page 4, par (0054), line 1-10, UCI1 carried on the PUCCH #1 and UCI 2 carried on the PUCCH #2 need to be multiplexed, and are sent on a resource corresponding to the PUCCH #1 or the PUCCH #2, When the PUCCH #1 and a PUSCH). Li discloses all aspects of the claimed invention, except the first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot. CHOI is the same field of invention teaches the first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot (page 15, par (0146), line 1-10, the UE multiplex HARQ-ACK with PUSCH transmission in all of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed). Li and CHOI l analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor of access to a service device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify first PUSCH is a PUSCH occupying a plurality of time units, the time unit comprises a slot the teaching of Li to include the UE multiplex HARQ-ACK with PUSCH transmission in all of a plurality of slots in which PUSCH transmission is performed the teaching of CHOI because it is providing efficiently multiplexing uplink control information in a wireless communication system and an apparatus using the same. Examiner Notice Claim 1 would be allowable if (i) claims 3 or 4 or 6 or 8 are incorporated into the independent claim 1. Claim 15 would be allowable if (i) claims 17 or 18 are incorporated into the independent claim 15. Claim 20 would be allowable if (i) claims 3 or 4 or 6 or 8 or 17 or 18 are incorporated into the independent claim 20. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IQBAL ZAIDI whose telephone number is (571)270-3943. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon to Thu 8.a.m to 6.p.m.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Q Ngo can be reached on 57-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IQBAL ZAIDI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 17, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641507
FIRST NODE, SECOND NODE, THIRD NODE AND METHODS PERFORMED THEREBY FOR HANDLING ROAMING INFORMATION
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640800
UPLINK TRANSMISSION FOR MULTI-PANEL OPERATION
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634747
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONGESTION AND MULTI-CHANNEL CONTROL
4y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634186
SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATED TO A NULL-SPACE FOR A MIMO TRANSMITTER SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634737
MEASUREMENT GAP ENHANCEMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1211 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month