Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/344,560

CD73 COMPOUNDS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Priority
Jul 01, 2022 — provisional 63/357,948
Examiner
SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Gilead Sciences Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
130 granted / 191 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
260
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 191 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims Claims 1, 6, 10-11, and 13-15 are pending and are examined on their merits. Claim Objections Claims 10 and 11 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim must be in the alternative (OR) form and not the inclusive (AND) form. See MPEP § 608.01(n). Additionally, claims 10 and 11 each are dependent on claims 2 and 5, which have been canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(d) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 10 and 11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 10 and 11 are rejected as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim must be in the alternative (OR) form and not the inclusive (AND) form. Additionally, claims 10 and 11 each are dependent on claims 2 and 5, which have been canceled. Applicant may cancel the claims, amend the claims to place the claims in proper dependent form, rewrite the claims in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claims comply with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 6, 10-11, and 13-15 are free of the prior art. Claims 1, 6, and 13-15 are allowed. Applicant has developed compounds of Formula (I): PNG media_image1.png 157 235 media_image1.png Greyscale . Said compounds act as inhibitors of CD73, a protein commonly overexpressed in cancer cells. Applicant’s compounds are free of the art. The closest compounds in the art are each developed by applicant. The compounds of U.S. Patent No. 12,110,294 differ from the instant compounds in the nitrogenous ring attached to the pyrimidine-2,4-dione: PNG media_image2.png 305 285 media_image2.png Greyscale . The compounds of all of U.S. Patent No. 11,919,869, co-pending Application No. 19/075,160, and co-pending Application No. 17/997,594 and differ from the instant compounds in a similar manner: PNG media_image3.png 178 250 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 148 202 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 145 204 media_image5.png Greyscale . As the modifications needed to get from any of these compounds to applicant’s compounds would not be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, claims 1, 6, 10-11, and 13-15 are free of the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anthony Seitz whose telephone number is (703)756-4657. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM ET - 5:00 PM ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Lundgren can be reached at (571)272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY JOSEPH SEITZ/Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
May 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702662
USE OF PRIDOPIDINE AND ANALOGS FOR TREATING RETT SYNDROME
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697328
Methods for Treating Metastasis with Cathepsin C Inhibitors
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12678501
MODULATING PERMEABILITY OF THE BLOOD CEREBROSPINAL FLUID BARRIER
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668598
MK2 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662487
IMIDAZO[1,2-B][1,2,4]TRIAZOL DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+27.6%)
3y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 191 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month