DETAILED ACTION
This is the First Action for the Request for Continued Examination based on the 18/345,353 application filed on 06/30/2023 and which claims as amended on 03/11/2026 have been considered in the ensuing action.
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Objections
Claim 21 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 17. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1, 17 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rahmani et al (US 2023/0263989) in view of Kezirian et al (US 10,335,635).
Regarding claim 1:
Rahmani teaches positioning an open portion (see annotated Fig. below) of a member (the member is the entire device shown in Fig. 3), of the breathing apparatus (the device is designed such that the user breathes through the device, and therefore has been considered a breathing apparatus), to a nose without covering an open a mouth of a user (see Fig. 1, the open portions are placed within the nose without covering any other portion of the face of the user) such that nasal breathing by the user through the open portion results in anterior movement of a soft palate of the user to open space in an area of a throat of the user behind the soft palate to create a continuous air pathway from the nose to lungs of the user (The device is configured to have the user breathe in and out through the nose of the user, which would result in anterior movement of the soft palate to open space in an area of the throat behind the soft palate to create continuous air pathway from the nose to the lungs); and performing by the user the nasal breathing exercise via the continuous air pathway, with the breathing apparatus, in which the user generates, a pressure within the open portion that produces an airflow or airflow rate against an airflow resistance determined by an airflow resistance mechanism to train muscles of the user (Rahmani appears to show valve mechanisms that are biased closed, see Fig. 2A-2B, such that one is biased to open with positive pressure in the open portion and the other is biased to open with negative pressure in the open portion “on inhale, outside air 204 passes through vents 208 in device housing 212. The force of outside air 204 forces check valve 216 to open, while check valve 220 remains shut. This allows air 224 to selectively pass through device housing 212 into one nostril and not the other.” And “on exhale, air 254 passes from a user's nostril (not shown). The force of air causes check valve 258 to open, while check valve 262 remains closed, resulting in air 254 selectively passing through one nostril and not the other.” See paragraphs [0015-0016]; breathing through the device will train the muscles of the user and would require an airflow through the valve mechanism/airflow resistance mechanism).
[AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Open portion)]
PNG
media_image1.png
280
470
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Rahmani et al discusses performing the breathing exercises to reduce blood pressure, but fails to distinctly disclose that performing by the user the nasal breathing exercise via the continuous air pathway, with the breathing apparatus, in which the user generates, for a predetermined number of repetitions or duration of time.
Kezirian et al teaches various breathing exercisers with open proximal portions, valve mechanism and distal ends and a method of use that includes “and generating, by the user, with the head and neck exercise apparatus, for a predetermined number of repetitions or duration of time, the absolute pressure within the open proximal portion such that there is a response in the feedback mechanism to train muscles associated with creating the absolute pressure.” See claim 1.
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to replace the method of use disclosed by Rahmani et al with the method of use disclosed by Kezirian et al as both methods are directed to breathing exercises performed with a device having open proximal portions through which a user breathes, a valve mechanism and distal ends. Further, breathing (exercising) for a certain amount of time or repetitions is well known in the art.
Regarding claim 17:
Rahmani as modified discloses the breathing apparatus includes a chromogenic material, membrane, visual signal, airflow meter, acoustic device, or moveable element (the valve mechanism is a moveable element) that defines a feedback mechanism that is operatively arranged within the breathing apparatus and configured to respond when the airflow or airflow rate is greater than a threshold.
Regarding claim 21:
Rahmani as modified discloses the breathing apparatus includes a chromogenic material, membrane, visual signal, airflow meter, acoustic device, or moveable element (the valve mechanism is a moveable element) that defines a feedback mechanism that is operatively arranged within the breathing apparatus and configured to respond when the airflow rate is greater than a threshold.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 ,15, 19, 23, 27, 29 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
The Examiner notes that it would not be reasonable to modify the method of use of Rahmani et al to include a secondary apparatus with different features based on predefined criteria being met (claims 3 and its dependents ) or to pick between devices with different features (claims 9) or to modify the resistance of the apparatus (5, 13, as the device of Rahmani et al is simply used for unidirectional airflow in each nostril and is not designed to have different resistances, or valve mechanisms.
Further, the Examiner notes that while Kezirian et al teaches the method of use of the apparatus in all aspects but that the open proximal portion is placed to a user’s nose without covering an open mouth for nose breathing, it would be unreasonable to modify Kezirian et al to be placed against the user’s nose, as Kezirian et al strictly teaches mouth exercise devices and further no secondary reference that teaches both a device that can be placed against a user’s mouth and separately against a user’s nose without covering a mouth, to perform exercises has been identified.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEGAN M ANDERSON whose telephone number is (313)446-6531. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6 a.m. -4 p.m. (Arizona).
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LoAn Jimenez can be reached at 571-272-4966. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Megan Anderson/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3784