Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/345,584

STACKABLE LIGHTING MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 30, 2023
Priority
May 12, 2023 — CIP of 18/316,859 +1 more
Examiner
HAYES, KRISTEN C
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
AutoStore Technology A/S
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
882 granted / 1285 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1317
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§112
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1285 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lindbo et al US 2018/0237221. Regarding claim 1, Lindbo discloses a stackable lighting module comprising a load-bearing frame (10) comprising a first support member (sidewall) and a second support member (sidewall) held in a spaced apart and parallel configuration by a cross-member (sidewall of 10)( Lindo: Figures 6a, 6b), and a light source module (60) attached to the cross-member, wherein the light source module is disposed to provide light to a growth module when the growth module is positioned adjacent to the stackable lighting module (Lindbo is capable of performing this functional limitation); whereby the load- bearing frame is configured to enable the stackable lighting module to occupy a cuboidal volume (Lindbo, Figure 10) within which the light source module is supported, and wherein the load-bearing frame comprises upper and lower load-transferring edge surfaces (Lindbo, Figure 9), and wherein the cross-member comprises a vertically arranged plate member (sidewall which supports 60) (Lindo, Figure 6a) for supporting the light source module. Regarding claim 2, Lindbo further discloses the light source module comprises electrical connectors (40) along upper and lower edges of the light source module, the connectors arranged such that, when a plurality of stackable lighting modules are arranged in a stack (Lindbo, ¶0042), the connector of a first light source module will engage the connector of a vertically adjacent light source module (Lindbo, ¶0043). Regarding claim 3, Lindbo further discloses the stackable lighting module is a functional component of a vertical farming system (Lindbo, ¶0070). Regarding claim 4, Lindo further discloses the upper load-transferring edge surface is provided with recesses (Lindbo, Figure 6a, ¶0044) arranged to be engaged by a gripping mechanism of a module handling vehicle of a vertical farming facility. Regarding claim 5, Lindbo further discloses the first support member and second support member each being side support members (Lindbo, Figure 6a). Regarding claim 6, Lindbo further discloses the side support members comprises a vertical guide (Lindbo, Figure 6b). Regarding claim 7, Lindbo further discloses the cross member being a growth board, said growth board comprising a component of growth modules of a vertical farming system (Lindbo, Figure 9 shows the stackable module stacked in a vertical farming system). Regarding claim 8, Lindbo further discloses the stackable module being arranged to be stackable upon a second load bearing frame that supports spacer module (the module of Lindbo is capable of performing this functional language), and the spacer module having a corresponding connector (40) in connection with the power grid, and thereby supplying electrical power to a stack of lighting modules. Claim(s) 1 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Koumoudis US 7,788,848. Regarding claim 1, Koumoudis discloses a stackable (Koumoudis, column 8: lines 10-15) lighting module comprising a load-bearing frame comprising a first support member (107(1)) and a second support member (107(2)) held in a spaced apart and parallel configuration by a cross-member (150), and a light source module attached to the cross-member (Koumoudis, column 8: lines 59-65), wherein the light source module is disposed to provide light to a growth module when the growth module is positioned adjacent to the stackable lighting module (Koumoudis is capable of performing this functional limitation), whereby the load-bearing frame is configured to enable the stackable lighting module to occupy a cuboidal volume within which the light source module is supported (Koumoudis is capable of performing this functional limitation), wherein the load-bearing frame comprises upper and lower load-transferring edge surfaces (103, 109), and wherein the cross-member comprises a vertically arranged plate member (150) for supporting the light source module. Regarding claim 5, Koumoudis further discloses the first support member and second support member being side support members (Koumoudis, Figure 1(A)). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-8 under Lindbo US 2018/0237221 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in light of a different embodiment of Lindbo US 2018/0237221 as well as Koumoudis US 7,788,848, as discussed above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRISTEN C HAYES whose telephone number is (571)272-7881. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michener Joshua can be reached at 571.272.1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRISTEN C HAYES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702094
Plant Container Suspension Device
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680381
Expandable Step System
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677762
FLOWERPOT SHADE APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677757
Plant Display Device
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672620
PLANT PROPAGATION SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS
5y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.7%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1285 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month