Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/346,388

GERMANIUM EXTRACTION FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 03, 2023
Priority
Jul 01, 2022 — provisional 63/358,078
Examiner
NGUYEN, CAM N
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Arizona Board of Regents
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1075 granted / 1267 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1304
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1267 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Application 1. This application was filed on 07/03/2023, which has Provisional of 63358078, which was filed on 07/01/2022. Claims 1-15 were originally presented in this application for examination. Claims 1-15 are currently pending in this application and under consideration. Specification 2. The examiner has not checked the specification to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors (grammatical, typographical, and idiomatic). Cooperation of the applicant(s) is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant(s) may become aware of in the specification, in the claims and in any further amendment(s) that applicant(s) may file. Applicant(s) is also requested to complete the status of the copending applications referred to in the specification by their Attorney Docket Number or Application Serial Number, if any. The status of the parent application(s) and/or any other application(s) cross-referenced to this application, if any, should be updated in a timely manner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102(a)(1) 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rafiee et al. “Recovering of a critical metal from electronic wastes: Germanium extraction with organic acid”, Journal of Cleaner Production 315 (2021) 128223. Rafiee et al. discloses a method for extraction of germanium from semiconductor diodes using acetic acid, and the characterizations results showed that the sample contains 5092 ppm germanium. The X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the main phases of germanium in the sample are Ge and GeO2. The obtained results shows that more than 70% of germanium was extracted from diode samples using 2.5 M of acetic acid at 90oC, after 240 min processing (see Abstract). Regarding claim 1, step a), the reference discloses a method which involves first grinding the diodes and then immersing the ground particles in deionized water and homogenizing using a magnetic stirrer (see page 2, section 2.1, “sample preparation”). Regarding claim 1, step b), the reference discloses leaching of the non-magnetic ground diodes with a leaching solution (see page 2, section 2.2, “Leaching experiments”). Regarding claim 1, the reference discloses the leaching solution contains lixiviant and water, and acetic acid as the lixiviant was used (see page 2, section 2.2). Regarding claims 2-5, the reference teaches to use acetic acid as lixiviant in the leaching solution, which is the same as in the claimed method and thus the pKa should be the same. Regarding claim 6, a magnetic stirrer was used to homogenize the ground particles with water in the first step and then the magnetic particles attached to the magnetic stir bar was manually removed and the process continued until all magnetic materials were separated (see page 2, section 2.1, “sample preparation”). Regarding claims 7 & 8, the reference discloses method for extraction of germanium from semiconductor diodes (see Abstract). Regarding claim 9, the reference discloses the X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the main phases of germanium in the sample are Ge and GeO2 (see Abstract). Regarding claim 10, the reference discloses the germanium is present in the solid material in an amount of 5092 ppm (see Abstract), and such amount is falling within the claimed amount of “up to about 10,000 ppm”. Regarding claim 11, the reference teaches a 2.5 M of acetic acid was used in the leaching solution (see Abstract), and such acid concentration is falling within the claimed acid concentration of “about 1 M to 10 M”. Regarding claim 12, the leaching step in the reference was performed for a duration of 240 min (see Abstract), which meets the claimed range of “about 5 minutes to about 360 minutes”. Regarding claim 13, the particle size distribution of non-magnetic ground particles were measured and conducted, and the results indicated that 80% of particles (d80) were smaller than 14.84 um (see page 2, section 3.1, “Characterization”). The disclosed particle size is falling with the claimed range of “about 10 um to about 100 um”. Regarding claim 14, the leaching solution and mixture of particulate solids have a liquid to solid ratio of 100:1 (v/wt) (see page 2, section 2.2, “Leaching experiments”). The disclosed volume/weight ratio of the reference appears falling within the claimed range of “from 10:1 to about 1000:1). Regarding claim 15, the reference teaches recovered germanium, and the germanium is recovered using the same method as claimed (see Abstract). Citations 4. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. All references are cited for related art. See PTO-892 Form prepared. Conclusion 5. Claims 1-15 are pending. Claims 1-15 are rejected. No claims are allowed. Contacts 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Primary Examiner CAM N. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1357. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8:30 am – 5:00 pm) at alternative worksite or at cam.nguyen@uspto.gov. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer, can be reached at 571-270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Cam N. Nguyen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1736 /CNN/ December 11, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636641
INHIBITION-FREE LOW-TEMPERATURE ENGINE EXHAUST OXIDATION CATALYST
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637361
PRODUCTION METHOD FOR COBALT SULFATE
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629662
SELECTIVE AMMONIA OXIDATION CATALYST
4y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630437
PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING HIGH-PURITY MAGNESIUM OXIDE
3y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12599898
FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING CATALYST COMPOSITION FOR ENHANCED BUTYLENES YIELDS WITH METAL PASSIVATION FUNCTIONALITY
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1267 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month