Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/346,428

ORGAN MODEL CONTAINING ELASTIC PASSAGE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 03, 2023
Priority
Jul 06, 2022 — CN 202210797760.4
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Honest Medical China Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
397 granted / 758 resolved
-17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Independent claims 1 & 15, recite “wherein the first tissue mold includes a main vessel part extending about a substantially-central section thereof and a plurality of branch vessel parts extending from the main vessel part; whereby an opening is formed at a terminal section of the main vessel part and terminal sections of the plurality of branch vessel parts; and selectively positioning the first artificial tissue in the second tissue mold. At least these words in these claims, Claim 8, uses the word “subsequently”, claim 10, uses the word “corresponding” and claim 11, uses the word “either”. Claims 2-14, 16 & 17 are rejected due to their dependencies. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 31, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 26, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640054
COMPUTATIONAL IN SILICO MODEL FOR PLACENTAL BARRIER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640058
SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING THORACIC CAGE AND LUMBAR SPINE REGION
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633226
AUTOMATED CUSTOMIZATION VIRTUAL ECOSYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626608
SYSTEM TO DETERMINE A PERSONALIZED LEARNING PATHWAY
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626609
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.9%)
3y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month