Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/346,655

CATHODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 03, 2023
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0125253
Examiner
LI, AIQUN
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
SK Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
535 granted / 835 resolved
-0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
75.1%
+35.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 835 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-5 and 12-21 in the reply filed on 4 June 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 6-11 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent 7081142 (Carlson). Regarding claims 1 and 5, Carlson teaches a cathode assembly for a secondary battery comprises a cathode current collector layer 401, a cathode active material layer 201 on a surface of the cathode current collector layer (Figs 6 and 8, col. 29 line 60-col. 30, line 21), and a cathode tab attached to the current collector (col. 41, line 50-60), which meets the claimed cathode plate. Carlson teaches the cathode current collector layer 401 includes coating layers comprising conductive polymers (col. 30, line 22-26), and an electrode insulating layer 501 is coated on the edge of the cathode assembly (Fig. 6 and Fig. 8, col. 5, line 5- 60, and col. 31, line 5-15), wherein the insulating layer comprises an polymeric layer (col. 5, line 15-20 and col. 37,line 50-60), which meet the claimed coating layer. Regarding claim 2, Carlson teaches that the conductive polymer layer 401 is formed prior to that of the electrode insulating polymer layer 501 on the outer edge (Fig. 8). Regarding claim 3, Carlson teaches that the tab is made to the current collector layer to provide connection to external circuit (col. 41, line 30-35 and 50-60), thus no insulating coating in the tab region. Regarding claim 4, Carlson teaches that the coating layer wraps around the edge and covers part of the flat surface of the cathode (Fig. 8), which meets extending from the edge to the flat surface of the cathode. Regarding claims 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20, Carlson teaches a lithium secondary battery comprises a cathode assembly, an anode assembly, a separator in between, an electrolyte and a case to enclose and seal the entire assembly(col. 7, line 15-20, col. 44, line 60-col. 45 line 20, col. 46, line 10-35 and Fig. 11). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5 and 12-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US2013/0252092 (Huang) in view of US2002/0197535 A1 (Dudley), and further in view of Carlson. Regarding claims 1-5, Huang teaches a cathode for a lithium ion battery comprising a current collector, an electrode active material filled in the pores and on the both sides of the current collector, and a porous ionic conductive polymer binder coated on the current collector and the electrode material (Fig. 1, [0022] and [0027]), wherein after assembling the cathode, separator and anode layer together the whole cell is also covered with a layer of porous ionic conductive polymer binder ([0018]), thus the edge and the surface of the cathode are covered with the ionic conductive polymer. Huang does not teach an insulating polymeric coating layer at the edge portion of the cathode. Dudley teaches coating a cathode edge with an insulating edge material protects the cathode from undesired effects of current density variations and shorts([0016] and [0022]), wherein the edge material is an insulating polymer ([0096] and [0099]), and the edge material substantially covers a tapered cathode edge (Fig. 1a and [0053]), thus forming a tapered coating layer ([0066] and [0116]). At the time the invention was made it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to coat the cathode of Huang with the insulating polymeric edge coating material of Dudley to form a tapered coating layer. The rationale to do so would have been the motivation provided by the teachings of Dudley to do so would predictably prevent current density variations and shorts([0016] and [0022]). Neither Huang nor Dudley teaches the presence of a tab. Carlson teaches that tabs are well known in the art of fabricating battery cells for providing the connections between the anode and the cathode to the external circuit for the cell, wherein the connection of one or more tabs is typically made to the cathode current collector (col.41, line 33-38 and 50-60). At the time the invention was made it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to attach a tab of Carlson to the cathode current collector of Huang and Dudley. The rationale to do so would have been the motivation provided by the teachings of Carlson that to do so would provide connections to the external circuit for the cell (col.41, line 33-38 and 50-60). Consequently, it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art not to coat the tab region with the insulating polymer as electronic conductivity is required for the tab to connect the cathode to the external circuit. Regarding claims 12-21, Huang teaches a lithium ion battery comprises one pair of cathode layer and anode layer, wherein the cathode layer and the anode layer are configured through a separator in between ([0021] and Fig. 1), and the cathode and the anode layer are illustrated as in a plate-like form with same width, length and thickness (Fig. 1 and [0017]) . Huang does not expressly discloses the presence of a enclosing cover and an electrolyte, however, it is common knowledge that an enclosing casing and an electrolyte are the basic components of a lithium ion battery as evidenced by Carlson (col.1, line 50-60, col. 40, line 35-56 and col. 43, line 10-15), wherein an electrolyte element is interposed between the cathode and the anode to prevent the flow of electrons from the anode to the cathode , and to permit the transport of ions between the anode and the cathode during cell discharge/charging (col. 1, line 50-60), and the casing acts as a seal or barrier against the transport of liquids or volatile materials into or out of the cell stack (col. 40, line 38-43). At the time the invention was made it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to include an electrolyte in the battery cell and seal the cell stack of Huang and Dudley with a casing . The rationale to do so would have been the motivation provided by the teachings of Carlson that to do so would prevent the flow of electrons from the anode to the cathode , and to permit the transport of ions between the anode and the cathode during cell discharge/charging , and to provide a barrier against the transport of liquids or volatile materials into or out of the cell stack ((col. 1, line 50-60 and col. 40, line 38-43). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AIQUN LI whose telephone number is (571)270-7736. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am -4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-2721302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AIQUN LI/ Ph.D., Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683246
SEPARATOR FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY AND NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676338
SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL, BATTERY USING SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665218
LITHIUM ION-CONDUCTING GARNET TYPE OXIDE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655341
TWO COMPONENT LOW DENSITY GEL FOR THE PROTECTION OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS FROM CORROSION IN OIL AND GAS WELLS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655270
ADDITIVE FOR ORGANIC CONDUCTOR, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, ORGANIC CONDUCTOR, AND ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+22.5%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 835 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month