Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/347,192

METHODS OF TREATING CYSTIC FIBROSIS USING WITH-NO-LYSINE (WNK) KINASE PATHWAY INHIBITORS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2023
Priority
Jul 05, 2022 — provisional 63/358,411
Examiner
SHIAO, REI TSANG
Art Unit
1691
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
University of Iowa Research Foundation
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1639 granted / 2053 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -34% lift
Without
With
+-34.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
2081
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2053 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Priority and Status of Claims 1. This application claims benefit of the provisional application: 63/358,411 with a filing date 07/05/2022. 2. Amendment of claims 2 and 15, and cancelation of claims 5, 9-11, 13-14, 24-25 and 27-30 in the amendment filed on 5/18/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 2-4, 6-8, 12, 15-23, 26 and 31 are pending in the application. Responses to Amendments/Arguments 3. The rejection of claims 2-3, 6-8, 12 and 15-17 under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) has been overcome in the amendment filed on 5/18/2026. Since claims 11 and 14 have been canceled, therefore the rejection of claims 11 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) has been obviated herein. However, claim 4 still has limitation “WNK kinase pathway inhibitor” without limitation (i.e., no named compounds), therefore the rejection of claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) is maintained. 4. The rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. 112 (b) has been overcome in the amendment filed on 5/18/2026. 5. Applicant's arguments regarding the rejection of claims 2 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a) over Yang et al. and He et al. ‘205 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants state “Without agreeing with the Office, claim 2 has been amended to recite the administration of the WNK kinase pathway inhibitor increases pH of airway surface liquid (ASL) and/or increases secretion of HCO3 ions in the ASL in the subject. The Yang and He references do not disclose or suggest increasing pH or secretion of HCO3- ions in ASL by administering an effective amount of the select WNK kinase pathway inhibitors required in claim 2, for treating one or more signs or symptoms of cystic fibrosis. In addition, increasing pH of ASL and/or increasing secretion of HCO3 ions in the ASL are elements of claims 4 and 6 respectively, which are not asserted to be obvious.”, see page 6. However, Yang et al. disclose that WMK1 and WNK 4 kinase are widely expressed modulator cystic fibrosis. Therefore WMK1 and WNK 4 kinase inhibitors can be used for treating cystic fibrosis. He et al. ‘205 discloses a WNK kinase inhibitor or a pharmaceutical composition comprising a WNK kinase inhibitor in the preparation of a product for the prevention and/or treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and its complications (e.g. cystic fibrosis), wherein the WNK kinase inhibitor has the structure of general formula (I), PNG media_image1.png 470 314 media_image1.png Greyscale , ad a specific WNK kinase inhibitor is WNK 463, see claim 1 and 5 on pages 2-3. Additionally, the discovery of a new property or use, i.e., WNK kinase pathway inhibitor increases pH of airway surface liquid (ASL) and/or increases secretion of HCO3- ions in the ASL in the subject, for treating cystic fibrosis of Yang et al. and He et al. ‘205, even when that property and use are unobvious from the prior art, cannot impart patentability to claims to the known compounds of, see In re Spada, 15 USPQ2d 1655 (Fed. Cir. 1990), and MPEP 2112.01. Therefore Yang et al. and He et al. ‘205 still render obviousness over the instant invention. The rejection of claims 2 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a) over Yang et al. and He et al. ‘205 is maintained. Since claim 11 has been canceled, therefore the rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) has been obviated herein. Claim Objections 6. Claims 3, 6-8 and 16-17 are objected to as being dependent on rejected claim 2. 7. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REI TSANG SHIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-0707. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Claytor can be reached on 571-272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REI TSANG SHIAO/ Rei-tsang Shiao, Ph.D.Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1691 June 15, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678434
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING ACE2 RECEPTOR
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678430
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LIVER DISORDERS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678421
COMPOSITION FOR ENHANCING NAMPT GENE EXPRESSION
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673915
PRECURSOR COMPOUND OF HEXAHYDRO-BETA-ACID COMPONENT COMPOUND, FEED COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661348
SYSTEMIC FORMULATION OF A PYRIDINONE DERIVATE FOR TG2-RELATED DISEASES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (-34.0%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 2053 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month