Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/347,896

Methods of Making Deuterium-Enriched N-Acetylcysteine Amide (D-NACA) and (2R,2R)-3,3-Disulfanediyl BIS(2-Acetamidopropanamide) (DINACA) and Using D-NACA and DINACA to Treat Diseases Involving Oxidative Stress

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 06, 2023
Examiner
ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL
Art Unit
1627
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Nacuity Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
59 granted / 103 resolved
-2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+47.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
153
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 103 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues (Page 2) the teachings of Anderson is moot to claimed invention teachings of (di-NACA-d6) and the teachings of MedChem fails to overcome the deuteration at the specific locations, as it is a hindsight reconstruction of claimed invention. It is noted from previous office action Anderson teaches the same compound and deuteration is well known in the art, in which MedChem teaches specifically CH3 to CD3 results in a longer half-life, low toxicity and increase tolerability and efficacy. Thus, the 103 rejection of record over Anderson in view of MedChem is maintained. Applicant has overcome the 112b rejection of claims 14 and 16 by the amendments to the claims. Claim 16 has been canceled. Claims 12-15 is pending. Claims 12-15 is now evaluated on its merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Anderson et al. (WO 9118594 A) in view of MedChem News, Deuterium Medicinal Chemistry: A New Approach to Drug Discovery and Development, May 2014, Pages 8-22. Regarding claims 12-15, Anderson teaches a method of treating diseases of chronic bronchitis, asthma, rhinitis, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, malignant diseases, HIV infection - AIDS, and atherosclerotic disease comprising compounds of N,N'-diacetylcystine dimethyl or diethyl ether, or N,N'-diisovalerylcystine dimethyl ether, in racemic form or their D and L optical isomers and physiologically acceptable salts. The compound N,N'-diacetylcystine as taught by Anderson of PNG media_image1.png 139 170 media_image1.png Greyscale ie. PNG media_image2.png 104 210 media_image2.png Greyscale (pages 1-3). Anderson fails to teach the above structure wherein the CH3 attached to the carbonyl has a deuterium substitution of CD3, the D3 causes enrichment about 8 to 10 points and the enrichment is within a predefined range of 0.02 mol% to 100%. MedChem teaches deuterium substitution for hydrogen decreased acidity of carboxylic acids and phenols, increase basicity of amines, low toxicity and increase tolerability and efficacy of a drug (page 10, 2nd and last para.). MedChem additionally teaches specific examples of CH3 to CD3 substitution results in a longer half-life as shown in example 11 PNG media_image3.png 213 355 media_image3.png Greyscale and example 13 PNG media_image4.png 152 468 media_image4.png Greyscale which provided improved metabolic stability (Page 13). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to have substituted the CH3 to deuterium CD3 on the PNG media_image1.png 139 170 media_image1.png Greyscale structure taught by Anderson, wherein the substituted deuterium enrichment is within a range of 0.02 mol% to 100 mol% and 8 to 10 percentage deuterium points above the natural abundance. One would have been motivated to do so from the teachings of MedChem on CH3 to CD3 substitution is known in the art to improve metabolic stability and increase half-life of the compound/drug, thus suggesting the deuterated substitution of the above structure taught by Anderson would fall within the range of 0.02 mol% to 100 mol% and the range of 8 to 10 percentage points above the natural abundance of deuterium. There is a reasonable expectation of substituting the CH3 to CD3 on the PNG media_image1.png 139 170 media_image1.png Greyscale structure taught by Anderson to improve metabolic stability and half-life for treating the above diseases, wherein the substituted deuterium enrichment is within a range of 0.02 mol% to 100 mol% and 8 to 10 percentage deuterium points above the natural abundance. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MIKHAIL O'DONNEL ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)270-0777. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kortney Klinkel can be reached at 571-270-5239. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MIKHAIL O'DONNEL. ROBINSON Examiner Art Unit 1627 /MIKHAIL O'DONNEL ROBINSON/Examiner, Art Unit 1627 /SARAH PIHONAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 28, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600729
NEW-TYPE BENZAZEPINE FUSED RING DERIVATIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595247
SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLO PIPERIDINE CARBOXYLIC ACIDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590086
3-((1H-PYRAZOL-4-YL)METHYL)-6'-(PHENYL)-2H-(1,2'-BIPYRIDIN)-2-ONE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS AS GPR139 ANTAGONISTS FOR USE IN A METHOD OF TREATMENT OF E.G. DEPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583871
PRMT5 INHIBITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583825
BENZO[H]QUINAZOLIN-4-AMINE AND THIENO[3,2-H]QUINAZOLIN-4-AMINE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+47.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 103 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month