Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/348,045

MODIFIED LIQUID ACTIVATED CARBON (FE-LAC) FOR IN-SITU ARSENIC REMOVAL

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 06, 2023
Examiner
NORRIS, CLAIRE A
Art Unit
1779
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
King Fahd University Of Petroleum & Minerals
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 838 resolved
+0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
878
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
82.9%
+42.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 838 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims: Claims 1, 2 and 4-13 are pending. Claims 1, 4, 6, 9 and 10 are amended. Claim 3 is Canceled. Claims 6-13 are withdrawn from consideration. This Action is Made Final. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 2, 4, and 5 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The prior art rejection is withdrawn in view of the amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 has been amended to require “an iron-modified liquid activated carbon…and an aqueous fluid, comprising water; and alcohol; and organic solvent…30 g/L to 40 g/L of a ferrous sulphate solution; 90 g/L to 100 g/L of a ferric chloride solution; and abas…”. There is no support in the original disclosure for the claimed combination of the iron-modified liquid activated carbon and aqueous fluid. The ferrous sulphate solution, ferric chloride solution and base are used to modify the liquid activated carbon in the aqueous fluid (see for example paragraphs 29-32 of the published specification). The specification discloses reactions occurring (“the activated carbon solution is then stirred for about 6 hours to 8 hours to produce the iron-modified activated carbon solution”) (see para. 0030, 0040). The specification further states that the “iron-modified liquid activated carbon was collected from the beaker through a valve into a container”. As at least the ferrous sulphate, ferric chloride, and base are reactants in the formation of the iron-modified activated carbon they would not be present in the aqueous solution in the same concentrations added and only any excess, if any, that is not reacted would remain in solution (as show in figure 4 the iron from the ferrous sulphate and ferric chloride attach to the surface of the activated carbon). Therefore there is not support in the original disclosure for the aqueous fluid containing the components currently claimed. Claims 2, 4, and 5 contain new matter because they depend from claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Awadh (US 2021/0139348) teaches a suspension of activated carbon comprising water, an alcohol (ethanol) and an organic solvent (ethylene glycol) (see Claim 7). Min et al (KR 20220003264, English machine translation provided) which teaches forming iron oxide coated activated carbon with an iron chloride solution and a base (see pg. 5, 5th- 8th paragraphs). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CLAIRE A NORRIS whose telephone number is (571)272-5133. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30-5 F: 8-12. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ramdhanie Bobby can be reached at 571-270-3240. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CLAIRE A NORRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1779 4/27/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 20, 2026
Interview Requested
May 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637373
Method for Promoting Degradation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Pseudomonas JD37 With Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI) and Use Thereof
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637375
PROCESSING METHOD FOR GRAPHITE ACID PURIFICATION WASTEWATER
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630447
Buoyant Water Purification Pad
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623939
BIOFILTER WITH SHAPED UNDERDRAIN ASSEMBLY
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623940
MABR-BASED METHOD FOR TREATING RARE EARTH MINE TAILWATER
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+28.0%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 838 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month