Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/348,378

THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING DEVICE, LIGHT CONTROL MODULE AND OPERATION METHOD OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
Jul 07, 2023
Examiner
SMITH JR., JIMMY R
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
282 granted / 437 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 437 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
The arguments and amendments submitted 12/22/2025 have been considered. The merits of the claims are discussed below. Election/Restrictions Claim 10 is directed to an allowable product. Pursuant to the procedures set forth in MPEP § 821.04(B), claims 15-20, directed to the process of making or using an allowable product, previously withdrawn from consideration as a result of a restriction requirement, are hereby rejoined and fully examined for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104. In view of the withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant(s) are advised that if any claim presented in a continuation or divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once the restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 21 and 22 each recite "an orthogonal projection of the side wall of the first substrate on the second substrate". It is unclear what the orientation of the recited orthogonal projection is on the second substrate and which surface on the second substrate has the orthogonal projection on it. For the purpose of examination, claims 21 and 22 each read on “an orthogonal projection of the side wall of the first substrate on an outer surface of the second substrate". Claims 21 and 22 each recite "an orthogonal projection of a side wall of the adhesive layer on the second substrate". It is unclear what the orientation of the recited orthogonal projection is on the second substrate and which surface on the second substrate has the orthogonal projection on it. For the purpose of examination, claims 21 and 22 each read on “an orthogonal projection of a side wall of the adhesive layer on the outer surface of the second substrate". Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 and 7-20 are allowed. Claims 21-22 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 1, 10, and 15 are allowed in view of the present amendments, which distinguish over the prior art of record. Goldman (US PG Pub 2023/0150200), Yamada (US PG Pub 2019/0310507), and Park (US PG Pub 2023/0292563), each made of record previously, are the closest prior art of record for claims 1, 10 and 15. The teachings of these references which are relevant to claims 1, 10, and 15 are discussed in sections 6 and 17 of the previous office action. Response to Arguments The previous 103 rejections of the claims have been withdrawn in view of the present amendment of claims 1 and 10 for the reasons given above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIM R SMITH whose telephone number is (303)297-4318. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JRS/ Examiner Art Unit 1745 /JIMMY R SMITH JR./Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jun 18, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Nov 14, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600091
OPTICAL SHAPING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598895
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570043
POWDER BED FUSION RECOATER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570359
VEHICLE PILLAR REINFORCEMENT USING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564987
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CURING FORMABLE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month