Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/349,376

SHOWER APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Priority
Apr 20, 2023 — CN 202310429631.4 +1 more
Examiner
LIU, JINGCHEN
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Xiamen Prime Shower Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
64 granted / 102 resolved
-7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +67% interview lift
Without
With
+67.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 102 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 05/20/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Leavitt 20230311034. Regarding claim 1, Leavitt teaches the invention as claimed: A shower apparatus (100 in Fig. 1C), comprising: a water passing pipeline (comprising connecting arm 122 and water passing body in annotated Fig. 1C), wherein a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the water passing pipeline (the 122 part) is configured to be connected with a water inlet pipe (per [0030] and Fig. 1C, a water source configured to provided water to 122; thus, the water source is require to have a water inlet pipe connected to 122) disposed on a wall (the wall having the surface 160, see Fig. 1C and [0028]); a filter assembly (110 in Fig. 1C, which comprising housing 112 and filter cartridge 210, see Fig. 2C and [0037-0038]), wherein a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the filter assembly (110) is connected to a water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the water passing pipeline (the water passing body part in annotated Fig. 1C), and a water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the filter assembly (110) is connected to a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of a hose (130); a water outlet assembly (126, Fig. 1C), wherein a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the water outlet assembly (126) is connected to a water outlet end (where the hose 130 is connected to 126 and is hanged on the support structure 124, see Fig. 1C) of the hose (130), and the water outlet assembly (126) is hung on the water passing pipeline (at the support structure 124 of the water passing pipeline, see Fig. 1C); and the water passing pipeline comprises a connecting arm (122) and a water passing body (annotated Fig. 1C), wherein a water inlet end of the connecting arm is configured as the water inlet end of the water passing pipeline (as shown in annotated Fig. 1C, the water inlet end of the water passing pipeline is the water inlet end od 122), and a ball joint (comprising at least a ball head, see annotated Fig. 1C) is connected between a water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the connecting arm (122) and a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the water passing body (annotated Fig. 1C); and a water outlet end of the water passing body is configured as the water outlet end of the water passing pipeline (as shown in annotated Fig. 1C, the water outlet end of the water passing body is configured as the water outlet end of the water passing pipeline), and the water passing body (annotated Fig. 1C) is connected to (fluidly connected via filter 110 and hose 130) the water outlet assembly (126, see Fig. 1C). PNG media_image1.png 810 984 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Leavitt further teaches wherein the water passing body (annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1) is provided with a C-shaped hole (the support structure 124 is formed as a c-shaped hole as shown in Fig. 4B) for placing the water outlet assembly (126). Regarding claim 6, Leavitt further teaches wherein the water outlet assembly (126) is a shower head (126, see Fig. 1C), wherein the shower head (126) comprises a handle (annotated Fig. 1C), a shower head body (annotated Fig. 1C) and a water outlet panel (annotated Fig. 1C); a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the shower head body (annotated Fig. 1C) is connected to a first end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the handle (annotated Fig. 1C), and a water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the shower head body (annotated Fig. 1C) is connected to the water outlet panel (annotated Fig. 1C); and a second end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the handle (annotated Fig. 1C) is configured as the water inlet end of the water outlet assembly (see annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1 above and annotated Fig. 1C in claim 6 below), and the hose (130) is inserted into the C-shaped hole (the support structure 124 has the C-shaped hole, see Figs. 1C and 4B). PNG media_image2.png 935 1061 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, Leavitt further teaches wherein the filter assembly (110, Fig. 1C) comprises a housing (112) and a filter element (210, see Fig. 2C and [0037-0038]) disposed in the housing (112), wherein a water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the housing (112) is configured as the water inlet end of the filter assembly (see annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1 above and annotated Fig. 1C in claim 7 below), and a water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1C) of the housing (112) is configured as the water outlet end of the filter assembly (see annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1 above and annotated Fig. 1C in claim 7 below). PNG media_image1.png 810 984 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Leavitt 20230311034 in view of Quinn 20130340854. Regarding claim 3, Leavitt further teaches wherein the water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1) of the connecting arm (122) is connected to the ball joint (annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1), the ball joint (annotated Fig. 1C) comprising a ball head (see Fig. 1C) connected to the water inlet end (annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1) of the water passing body (annotated Fig. 1C in claim 1). Leavitt does not teach wherein the water outlet end of the connecting arm is connected to a connecting part of the ball joint, a ball head of the ball joint is received m a connecting nut and rotatably connected to the connecting nut, and the connecting nut is in threaded connection with the water inlet end of the water passing body. However, Quinn teaches wherein the water outlet end (annotated Fig. 1) of the connecting arm (104, Fig. 1) is connected to a connecting part (annotated Fig. 4) of the ball joint (comprising the connecting part in annotated Fig. 4 and 126 in Fig. 4), a ball head (126 Fig. 4) of the ball joint is received in a connecting nut (118, best seen in Figs. 3-4) and rotatably connected to the connecting nut (118, [0082]), and the connecting nut (118) is in threaded connection with (via wall 160 at thread 162 and 168, see Fig. 4 and [0090]) the water inlet end (where 134 is, see Fig. 4) of the water passing body (116). PNG media_image3.png 776 768 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 715 1054 media_image4.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the disclosed but non-depicted ball joint of Leavitt to be the ball joint received in a connecting nut as taught by Quinn, such that wherein the water outlet end of the connecting arm is connected to a connecting part of the ball joint, a ball head of the ball joint is received m a connecting nut and rotatably connected to the connecting nut, and the connecting nut is in threaded connection with the water inlet end of the water passing body in order to selective move the water passing body relative to the connecting arm and allow a user to control the direction that a fluid exits the showerhead (Quinn, [0082]). It is noted that such motivation is applicable when Leavitt’s shower outlet assembly is hung on the water passing body as shown in Leavitt’s Fig. 1C. Regarding claim 4, Leavitt in view of Quinn as discussed so far does not teach wherein a spherical sleeve is arranged between the ball head of the ball joint and the connecting nut, and a spherical pad is arranged between the ball head of the ball joint and the water inlet end of the water passing body. However, Quinn further teaches wherein a spherical sleeve (142, best seen in Figs. 3-4) is arranged between the ball head (126) of the ball joint and the connecting nut (118), and a spherical pad (140) is arranged between the ball head (126) of the ball joint and the water inlet end (where 134 is) of the water passing body (116, best seen in Figs. 3-4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to provide Leavitt in view of Quinn with Quinn’s spherical sleeve and spherical pad, such that a spherical sleeve is arranged between the ball head of the ball joint and the connecting nut, and a spherical pad is arranged between the ball head of the ball joint and the water inlet end of the water passing body in order to prevent water from leaking around and between particular elements (Quinn, [0115]). Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Leavitt 20230311034 in view of Genin 20200247700. Regarding claim 8, Leavitt further teaches wherein the filter element (210) comprises a plurality of elements ([0075]), whether the plurality of elements comprising a residual chlorine removal filter element (the activated carbon, [0074]), a KDF filter element ([0074-0075]), and a scale inhibition filter element (polyphosphate beads, [0074]). Leavitt does not teach wherein the filter element comprises a bacteriostatic filter element, a VC filter element, a mineralization filter element, a hydrogen-rich filter element, a fluorine removal filter element, a metasilicic acid filter element, an alkaline filter element, and a fragrance filter element. However, Genin teaches wherein the filter element (the filter cartridge 19 comprising a plurality of filter elements 21, see Fig. 2 and [0041]) comprises a bacteriostatic filter element, a VC filter element, a mineralization filter element, a hydrogen-rich filter element, a fluorine removal filter element, a metasilicic acid filter element, an alkaline filter element, and a fragrance filter element (per [0004, 0010-0011 and 0015], the plurality of elements 21 forming the multi-staged filter cartridge 19, wherein the plurality of elements comprises: tourmaline ceramic balls, maifan stone, potassium metasilicate ceramic balls, vitamin C ceramic balls which mineralize water that are the claimed VC filter element, mineralization filter element, and metasilicic acid filter element; hydrogen water ceramic balls, which is the claimed hydrogen-rich filter element; alkaline ceramic balls, which is the claimed alkaline filter element, see middle of [0011] in p. 1; fluorine removal property, which is the claimed fluorine removal filter element, see top of [0011] in p. 2; volatile organic chemicals configured to remove sediments and bacteria, which is the claimed bacteriostatic filter element and scale inhibition filter element, see top of [0011] in p. 1 and [0015]; deodorant, which is the claimed fragrance filter elements, see top of [0011] in p. 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to provide Leavitt with Genin’s filter elements in addition to Leavitt’s filter elements, such that wherein the filter element comprises a bacteriostatic filter element, a VC filter element, a mineralization filter element, a hydrogen- rich filter element, a fluorine removal filter element, a metasilicic acid filter element, an alkaline filter element, and a fragrance filter element in order improve water quality and stability by a process, e.g., soften the water, remove contaminants, irritants, bacteria, heavy metals, and unpleasant odors, etc. (Genin, [0002-0003]). Regarding claim 9, Leavitt does not teach wherein the housing is provided as a first housing and a second housing, wherein the first housing is in threaded connection with the second housing, a water inlet end of the first housing is configured as the water inlet end of the housing, and a water outlet end of the second housing is configured as the water outlet end of the housing. However, Genin teaches a filter assembly (as shown in Figs. 1-2) for a shower apparatus (title) comprising a housing (comprising 1-3 and 9-11) and a filter element (19, see Fig. 2 and [0041]) disposed in the housing (see Figs. 1-2), wherein the housing is provided as a first housing (1-3) and a second housing (9-11, see Figs. 1-2), wherein the first housing is in threaded connection with the second housing (at threaded part 15 and 17, see Fig. 2), a water inlet end (1) of the first housing (1-3) is configured as the water inlet end of the housing (water enters filter via water inlet end 1, see [0037]), and a water outlet end (11) of the second housing (9-11) is configured as the water outlet end of the housing (water exits filter via the water outlet end 11, see [0037]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Leavitt with Genin’s forming the housing with a first housing and a second housing, such that wherein the first housing is in threaded connection with the second housing, a water inlet end of the first housing is configured as the water inlet end of the housing, and a water outlet end of the second housing is configured as the water outlet end of the housing because it is noted that a simple substitution of one known element, in this case, using a single-piece housing, for another, in this case, using a joined two-piece housing, to obtain predictable results, in this case, forming a housing for placing a filter therein, was an obvious extension of prior art teachings, MPEP 2141 III(B). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 05/20/2026 have been fully considered. Applicant’s argument about ZHADANOV is persuasive and thus, the 102 rejection for claim 1 based on ZHADANOV issued in the Office Action mailed 01/27/2026 is withdraw. However, because Applicant filed Request for Continued Examination on 05/20/206, a new ground rejection for amended claim 1 is issued based on the previously applied reference Leavitt (see rejection above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JINGCHEN LIU whose telephone number is (571)272-6639. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Devon Kramer can be reached at (571) 272-7118. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JINGCHEN LIU/Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698901
GAS TURBINE ENGINE WITH IMPROVED HIGH PRESSURE COMPRESSOR LEAKAGE PATH GUIDE STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12662961
GAS TURBINE CONTROL DEVICE, GAS TURBINE, AND GAS TURBINE CONTROL METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12644412
CRYOGENIC FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS INCLUDING HEAT EXCHANGERS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12624665
Purge System for Dual-Fuel Gas Turbine Engine
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12607359
COMBUSTOR AND GAS TURBINE
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+67.2%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 102 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month