Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/349,459

RADIATION IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, RADIATION IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND RADIATION IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Priority
Jul 13, 2022 — JP 2022-112634
Examiner
RUDOLPH, VINCENT M
Art Unit
2671
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
133 granted / 283 resolved
-15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
312
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 283 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Amendment received in response to the Non-Final Rejection mailed 12/5/2025 has been entered and made of record. Claims 1, 3-7, and 9-13 remain pending with claims 4-6 and 9-11 withdrawn from consideration. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments towards the 35 USC 101 rejection have been considered. Previous dependent claim 8, which was not rejected under 101, was incorporated into the independent claims. As such, the 101 rejection is withdrawn. Applicant’s additional arguments have been considered but not persuasive. The reason is the limitation in question is done “according to an order”, which based on the broadest reasonable interpretation in light of the specification, is still broad enough that the order as disclosed within Kawamura is sufficient for the radiation to be transmitted within. In this case, the order is the changing of the attenuation coefficient of each composition as seen in Par. [0046]. Thus, based on the broadness of the limitation within the claim, Kawamura still does meet each limitation of the claims. Based on these facts, this action is made FINAL. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 5/12/2026 and 6/3/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 7, and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawamura (US Pub 20210100520), included in the IDS dated 7/10/2023. Regarding claim 1, Kawamura discloses a radiation image processing device (Kawamura Fig. 1, image apparatus) comprising: at least one processor (Kawamura Fig. 2, Element 21, CPU), wherein the processor derives, based on at least one radiation image based on radiation that is transmitted through a subject including a plurality of compositions, a thickness of at least one composition of the plurality of compositions for each pixel of the radiation image (Kawamura Par. [0032], derives the body thickness of the subject H for the pixels of the radiographic image), and derives a composition image for the at least one composition by using an attenuation coefficient based only on the thickness of the at least one composition (Kawamura Par. [0032], derives composition image into a thickness by using an attenuation coefficient in the muscle of the subject), wherein the processor acquires two radiation images based on radiation that is transmitted through the subject and has different energy distributions from each other (Kawamura Par. [0028] and [0032], derives first and second radiographic images from which the scattered radiation components are removed, such that the first and second radiographic image have energy distributions different from one another), derives body thicknesses of the subject as a first body thickness and a second body thickness, respectively, for each pixel for each of the two radiation images by using an attenuation coefficient according to an order in which the radiation is transmitted through the plurality of compositions (Kawamura Par. [0032] and [0046], derives the body thickness of the subject H for the pixels of the first and second radiographic image by using an attention coefficient of the radiations for different energy distributions for a plurality of compositions), and derives the thickness of the at least one composition based on the first body thickness and the second body thickness (Kawamura Par. [0046], derive the thickness of the thickness of the composition between the first body thickness and second body thickness), and wherein the processor displays the composition image on a display (Kawamura Par. [0069], displays a distribution of the composition ratios in superimposition with any of the two radiographic images). Although different embodiments of Kawamura have been referred to, it would have been exceedingly obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kawamura by combining Kawamura’s similar embodiments in order to not limit the embodiments to themselves but include other evident combinations and extensions thereof (Kawamura Par. [0061]). Regarding claim 3, Kawamura discloses the radiation image processing device according to claim 2, wherein the processor derives the thickness of the at least one composition by regarding the subject as a model that is divided such that the plurality of compositions each are grouped together to have one thickness (Kawamura Par. [0056], derive the muscle composition by dividing the derived muscle thickness). Regarding claim 7, Kawamura discloses the radiation image processing device according to claim 2, wherein the two radiation images are acquired by two radiation detectors stacked on each other by simultaneously irradiating the two radiation detectors with the radiation transmitted through the subject (Kawamura Par. [0068], simultaneously irradiating the two detection units through the subject). Regarding claims 12-13, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein. In addition, the processing device of claim 1 corresponds to the method of claim 12, as well as the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium (Kawamura Fig. 2, Element 23, Storage) of claim 13, and performs the steps disclosed herein. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Vincent Rudolph whose telephone number is (571)272-8243. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM - 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VINCENT RUDOLPH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737866
ROAD DETERIORATION DIAGNOSING DEVICE, ROAD DETERIORATION DIAGNOSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731403
PROCESSING APPARATUS, PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETERMINING AN OBJECT BASED ON COLLATED KEYPOINTS AND THRESHOLD VALU
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731369
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS USING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725245
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL PROGRAM, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725449
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS CONFIGURED TO PERFORM FACE RECOGNITION, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+40.6%)
4y 6m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 283 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month