Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/350,458

SCHEDULING METHOD AND APPARATUS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 11, 2023
Examiner
ZHANG, ZHENSHENG
Art Unit
2474
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
287 granted / 380 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
419
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
71.6%
+31.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 380 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments regarding the 103 rejection have been carefully considered and they are moot because they do not apply to the new ground of rejection using the new references in the current office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21, 24-30, 33-39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MolavianJazi (US 20220408464) in view of Kwak (US 11456782). Regarding claim 21, MolavianJazi discloses a method of a base station, the method comprising: transmitting, to a terminal, a higher layer message including a first field configured to a first table for combinations of co-scheduled cells ([0306][0403-05], fig. 6, UE can be provided parameters configured to a table for co-scheduled calls by a higher layer message; for a cell from the set of co-scheduled cells, a UE (such as the UE 116) can be provided a common operation level for different scheduling parameters, such as a same column index in different tables), transmitting, to the terminal, downlink control information (DCI) including a first indicator indicating a combination of co-scheduled cells in the first table (fig. 6, [0232][0401], the UE receives a DCI format that includes a field with a value that provides an indication for a set from the number of configured sets of co-scheduled cells); transmitting, to the terminal, data through the co-scheduled cells indicated by the first indicator (fig. 6, [0232], the UE receives the multiple PDSCHs on the indicated set of co-scheduled cells based on the received values for the scheduling parameters); and receiving, from the terminal, a response message for the data transmitted through the co-scheduled cells based on the DCI (fig. 6, [0232], the UE transmits the multiple PUSCHs on the indicated set of co-scheduled cells based on the received values for the scheduling parameters. [0078], the UE may use a same physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource to transmit hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ)—acknowledgement (ACK) feedback corresponding to the multiple PDSCHs), wherein the higher layer message further includes a second field configured to set first information, the first information includes values of a physical resource block (PRB) bundling size to be applied to the co-scheduled cells ([0383], some resource allocation fields, such as PRB bundling, can be provided by higher layer signaling). Even though MolavianJazi discloses the UE receives a DCI format that includes a field with a value that provides an indication for a set from the number of configured sets of co-scheduled cells, MolavianJazi does not explicitly disclose a PRB bundling size indicator included in the DCI indicates one of a value of the PRB bundling size included in the first information. Kwak discloses a PRB bundling size indicator included in the DCI indicates one of a value of the PRB bundling size included in the first information (Kwak, claims 1, 4, receiving, from the base station, downlink control information (DCI) including a PRB bundling size indicator; in case that the PRB bundling size indicator indicates ‘0’, setting a PRB bundling size by using one value configured based on the received configuration information; in case that the PRB bundling size indicator indicates ‘1’: determining one of two values configured based on the received configuration information. The indicator taught by Kwak can be included in the DCI format taught by MolavianJazi), Kwak also discloses the higher layer message further includes a second field configured to set first information, the first information includes values of a physical resource block (PRB) bundling size to be applied to the co-scheduled cells (Kwak, claim 1, transmitting, to a terminal, configuration information on dynamic precoding resource block (PRB) bundling through higher layer signaling). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to combine the teachings of exchanging co-scheduled cells information as given by MolavianJazi with the teachings of specifying the DCI fields given by Kwak. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide a method so that the service can be smoothly supported in a wireless communication system (Kwak, col. 2). Claims 30 and 39 are rejected similarly as claim 21 noting that MolavianJazi discloses a processor ([0006-7]). Regarding claim 24, MolavianJazi discloses the method according to claim 21, wherein the higher layer message further includes at least one of a third field configured with a second table, or a fourth field configured with a third table, and wherein the second table includes entries associated with joint rate matching for cells, and the third table includes entries associated with zero power channel state information - reference signal (ZP CSI-RS) trigger ([0365][0401-404], other scheduling parameters related to resource allocation, such as, rate matching, and ZP CSI-RS trigger, can follow higher layer configuration; can be separately provided operation levels for different scheduling parameters, such as different column indexes in different tables, corresponding to different DCI fields with multi-cell mapping. Here, the parameters or entries can be arranged in a table ). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Claim 33 is rejected similarly with claims 24. Regarding claim 25, MolavianJazi discloses the method according to claim 24, wherein the DCI further includes rate matching indicator indicating an entry in the second table (MolavianJazi, [0312]). Claim 34 is rejected similarly with claims 25. Regarding claim 26, MolavianJazi discloses the method according to claim 24, wherein the DCI further includes ZP CSI-RS trigger indicating an entry in the third table (MolavianJazi, [0312]). Claim 35 is rejected similarly with claims 26. Regarding claim 27, MolavianJazi discloses the method according to claim 21, wherein the higher layer message further includes a sixth field configured with a fourth table, the fourth table including entries associated with joint time domain resource allocations (TDRA) ([0266], [0415], a gNB (such as the BS 102) can configure a mapping/table or an adjusting parameter for reinterpretation of a DCI field with multi-cell mapping for multi-cell scheduling, the gNB can configure or indicate same or similar values for various scheduling parameters such as for an FDRA, TDRA). Claim 36 is rejected similarly with claims 27. Regarding claim 28, MolavianJazi discloses the method according to claim 27, wherein the DCI further includes a second indicator indicating an entry in the fourth table ([0401-04], can be separately provided operation levels for different scheduling parameters, such as different column indexes in different tables, corresponding to different DCI fields with multi-cell mapping). Claim 37 is rejected similarly with claims 28. Regarding claim 29, MolavianJazi discloses the method according to claim 21, wherein the DCI and the response message are transmitted via a reference cell among the combination of co-scheduled cells indicated by the first indicator, and wherein the response message includes codebooks consisting of HARQ information corresponding to each co-scheduled cells ([0385], the UE determines to transmit HARQ feedback information corresponding to the multiple PDSCH of the multiple co-scheduled cells in a same PUCCH resource as indicated by the common PRI, or with a same K1 timeline as indicated by the K1 parameter, as indicated in the cell-common fields of the concatenated DCI format. Here, K1 parameter is related to the reference or selected cell). Claim 38 is rejected similarly with claims 29. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHENSHENG ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1985. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached at 571-272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHENSHENG ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2474
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592767
METHODS AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING SEAMLESS CONNECTIVITY IN A CALL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574267
DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL MULTI-SLOT BUNDLING INDICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568426
COMMUNICATION METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM OF AMBIENT BACKSCATTERING BASED ON WI-FI SIGNALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12538374
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION DURING FAST MCG LINK RECOVERY PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12526686
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING V2X COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A VEHICLE AND A RECEIVING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month