Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/351,063

Card Game for Improving Spelling Skills and Method of Playing the Same

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 12, 2023
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 755 resolved
-17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 755 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2 & 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. These claims contain vague indefinite language, including the use of the phrase “may be”. It is unclear whether the features following “may be” in each claim are intended to be positively recited as part of the claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Letang (U.S. Patent Number 6,450,499). Referring to claim 1, Letang discloses a box for carrying a game set (Fig. 1a & Fig. 1e); at least one set of cards, wherein each card of the at least one set of cards is comprised of a front face and a back face, and further wherein a word is provided on the back face (Fig. 1C & Fig. 1d & Fig. 1e); a holder (Fig. 1c); a timer (Figs. 1f & 2b); and a buzzer (a stopwatch has a buzzer/beeper when it goes off). Referring to claim 2, Letang discloses wherein the timer may be set to increments of five seconds (Fig. 2b). Referring to claim 3, Letang discloses wherein the increments range from five seconds to 30 seconds (Fig. 2b). Referring to claim 4, Letang discloses wherein the increment is 15 seconds (Fig. 2b). Referring to claim 5, Letang discloses wherein the word may be a one syllable word, a two syllable word or a multiple syllable word (Fig. 1c). Referring to claim 6, Letang discloses wherein each card of the at least one set of cards has a thickness ranging from about 147 GSM to about 640 GSM (Figs. 1c, 1d & 1e). Referring to claim 7, Letang discloses wherein each card of the at least one set of cards is comprised of an antimicrobial coating (Figs. 1c, 1d & 1e). Referring to claim 8, Letang discloses wherein the game set comprises at least three different sets of cards of varying spelling skill sets (Figs.1b, 1c, 1d, 1e). Referring to claim 9, Letang discloses wherein the at least one card set comprises one of animals, places or phonetically challenging words (Figs. 1b & Figs 3a-3d). Referring to claim 10, Letang discloses further comprising a plurality of medals or awards (Fig. 1a). Referring to claim 11, Letang discloses wherein the back face of each card of the at least one set of cards comprises a logo and is opaque (Figs. 1c, 1d, 1e & Figs. 3a-3d). Referring to claim 12, Letang discloses comprising the steps of: providing a game set having at least one set of cards (Fig. 1C & Fig. 1d & Fig. 1e), a timer (Figs. 1f & 2b) and a buzzer (a stopwatch has a buzzer/beeper when it goes off), wherein each card of the at least one set of cards is comprised of a front face and a back face (Fig. 1C & Fig. 1d & Fig. 1e); selecting a card from the at least one set of cards (Fig. 1c, 1d & 1e); announcing a word positioned on the front face of the card selected (Figs. 3a-3d); starting a timer (Fig. 1f & 2b); spelling the word (Figs. 5b, 5c & 6); and determining a correct spelling of the word (Figs. 3a-3d). Referring to claim 13, Letang discloses wherein the game set further comprises a plurality of awards (Fig. 1a). Referring to claim 14, Letang discloses further comprising a step of passing an opportunity to spell the word after the step of announcing the word (Figs. 3a-3d). Referring to claim 15, Letang discloses further comprising a step of starting another sequence of the method after the step of determining (Fig. 2a). Referring to claim 16, Letang discloses further comprising a step of awarding at least one of the plurality of awards to a player who has correctly spelled the word after the step of determining (Fig. 1a). Referring to claim 17, Letang discloses wherein each card of the at least one set of cards comprises a thickness ranging from about 147 GSM to about 640 GSM and an antimicrobial coating (Figs. 1c, 1d & 1e). Referring to claim 18, Letang discloses comprising: a box (Fig. 1a & Fig. 1e); at least one card set comprised of a plurality of cards, wherein each card in the plurality of cards is comprised of a front face and a rear face, and further wherein a word is positioned on the front face (Fig. 1C & Fig. 1d & Fig. 1e); a holder for the at least one card set (Fig. 1c); a timer (Fig. 1f & 2b); and buzzer, wherein each of the at least one card set, the holder, the timer and the buzzer are contained within the box until needed (a stopwatch has a buzzer/beeper when it goes off & Figs.). Referring to claim 19, Letang discloses wherein the at least one card set comprises a plurality of words having one syllable, two syllables or multiple syllables (Figs. 3a-3d). Referring to claim 20, Letang discloses wherein the at least one card set comprises a plurality of different themes or categories (Fig. 2a & Figs. 3a-3d). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586483
MODULAR CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMBLY FOR ADVANCED TRAINING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573310
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING A VOCATIONAL MASK WITH A HYPER-ENABLED WORKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12555489
Large Language Model-Enabled Artificial Intelligence-Based Virtual Interactive Reading Assistant
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12542066
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING PERSONALIZED INTERFACE CONTENT PLANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12536920
TRANSFORMER TRAINING LAB
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 755 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month