Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/352,148

NRF DISCOVERY FOR INTER-NETWORK COMMUNICATION

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 13, 2023
Examiner
MURILLO GARCIA, FABRICIO R
Art Unit
2633
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
481 granted / 569 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+56.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
606
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 569 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Following response to arguments is based on Applicant’s arguments filed on 05 December 2025. Regarding Previous Rejection Under 35 USC § 103 Applicant’s arguments [Pages 9-10] with respect to rejection of claims 1 and 11 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. Claim Status Claims 1, 6-7, 9, 11, 16-17, 19 have been amended. Claims 8, 10, 18, 20 have been canceled. Claim 21 has been added. Thus, claims 1-7, 9, 11-17, 19, 21 are presented for examination. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: For claim 1: At line 33, expand acronym “QoS” and enclose the acronym by parenthesis. For claim 11: This claim is objected as applied to claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 – Second Paragraph The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7, 9, 11-17, 19, 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. For claim 1: At line 32, “score of the NF based” lacks of antecedent basis. There are several types of “NF” previously introduced, but none of them are “NF” alone. At lines 32-33, “on the second information” lacks of antecedent basis. At line 33, hence, it is unclear which “NF” they are referring to at “bandwidth of the NF”, “level of the NF”, and “location of the NF”. At line 35, “the priority scores” lacks of antecedent basis, as it was previously introduced “a priority score”, not several of them. For claim 11: This claim is rejected as applied to claim 1. For claims 2-7, 9, 12-17, 19, 21: These claims are also rejected as they depend upon a rejected claim. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FABRICIO R MURILLO GARCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5708. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam K Ahn can be reached at 5712723044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. March 20, 2026 /FABRICIO R MURILLO GARCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 13, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604155
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CONNECTION AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598540
Configuration Method and Apparatus, and Terminal and Network Side Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593263
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC CONTENT HANDLING OF INTER-LAYER MESSAGES IN A POD BASED CLOUD NATIVE ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587452
CONTAINERIZATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK FUNCTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570238
MULTI-MODAL CONTEXT BASED VEHICLE THEFT PREVENTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+56.9%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 569 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month