Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/352,717

Methods and Devices For Complexing Target Entities

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 14, 2023
Examiner
LIMBAUGH, KATHRYN ELIZABETH
Art Unit
1797
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
STEMCELL Technologies Canada Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
134 granted / 177 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 177 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by United States Patent 10,220,332 B2 to Gjerde. Regarding claim 1, Gjerde discloses a device, including a column, for purifying (i.e., recovering), detecting and using biological cells (i.e., target entities) from a biological sample (see abstract), wherein the sample also comprises contaminants (see Col. 3, lines 25-26), the device comprising: lower frit 56 (i.e., a first porous unit) having a first set of pores (i.e., first pored member) (see claim 1), wherein the lower end of the column, flanking the first pored member, functions as an inlet and the other side flanking the first pored member functions as a first outlet (see Col. 3, lines 53-57; Figs. 14-18; Col. 7, last paragraph – Col. 8, 1st paragraph; Fig. 3A); upper frit 50 (i.e., second porous unit), having a second set of pores (i.e., second pored member) (see claim 1) flanked by a second inlet and wherein the upper end of the column, flanking the second pored member, functions as an outlet, the second porous unit 50 positioned downstream of and in fluid communication with the first porous unit 56 (see Col. 3, lines 53-57; Figs. 14-18; Col. 7, last paragraph – Col. 8, 1st paragraph; Fig. 3A); a chamber between the first porous unit 56 and the second porous unit 50 (see Col. 10, lines 12-15; Figs. 3A-B); and a plurality of beads 48 comprising capture entities (i.e., a plurality of binding compositions) loadable or loaded in the chamber, each binding composition comprising an antibody or antibody fragment (first moiety) and a second antibody (second moiety) attached to a tagged ligand (see Col. 2, last paragraph – Col. 3, 1st paragraph; Fig. 3A-B; Col. 33, line 22 – Col. 34, line 7); the plurality of binding compositions bind the tagged ligand to a cell surface marker (i.e., recognition motif) of target entities to form a complexed population of target entities (see Col. 34, lines 4-7; Figs. 4 & 8); a pore size of the second pored member is impervious to the complexed population of target entities (see Col. 2, lines 39-45; Figs. 3A-B); the first and second moieties are antibodies (see Col. 33, line 22 – Col. 34, line 7). Regarding claim 2, Gjerde discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses wherein a pore size of the first pored member is impervious to large contaminants in the sample (see Col. 3, lines 25-26). Regarding claim 3, Gjerde discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses wherein the pore size of the first pored member is impervious to the complexed population of target entities (see Col. 2, lines 39-45; Figs. 3A-B); Regarding claim 4, Gjerde discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses wherein, based on time, the amount of target entities exiting the column range from none to 100%, when all the target entities entering the column exit the column (see Fig. 9). At the point where 100% of the target entities are exiting the column, the binding compositions would be considered fully saturated. However, any point prior to that the binding compositions would be below saturation levels and thus reads on the limitation of claim 14. Regarding claim 5, Gjerde discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses wherein the moieties of the capture entities of the plurality of binding compositions can interact with the same or different recognition motifs (see Col. 33, line 22 – Col. 34, line 7). Regarding claim 6, Gjerde discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses wherein the linker of the plurality of binding compositions connecting the beads to the tagged ligand is comprised of a plurality of antibodies in series (i.e., including third and fourth moieties holding together the first and second moieties) (see Col. 34, lines 4-14). Regarding claim 7, Gjerde discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses wherein the first outlet and the second inlet are connectable thereby forming the chamber (see Fig. 3A). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHRYN E LIMBAUGH whose telephone number is (571)272-0787. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lyle Alexander can be reached at (571) 272-1254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHRYN ELIZABETH LIMBAUGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601683
SERIAL MULTICHANNEL MICROSCOPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592370
SCREENING WITH MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR MYCOBACTERIA PRIOR TO CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588801
PORT CONNECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590939
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR DETECTING HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584931
DEVICES AND CARTRIDGES FOR EXTRACTING BIO-SAMPLE REGIONS AND MOLECULES OF INTEREST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 177 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month