Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/353,798

AEROSOL-FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jul 17, 2023
Examiner
KUMAR, SRILAKSHMI K
Art Unit
1700
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen Smoore Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
305 granted / 551 resolved
-9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
415 currently pending
Career history
966
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 551 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the cover body" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The limitation “a cover body” is introduced in claim 2. Therefore, for the purposes of examination, claim 7 will be examined as being dependent on claim 2. Appropriate clarification/correction is requested. Claim 13 recites the limitation “wherein a second recession part is further formed on the surface of one side of the housing”. It is unclear whether or not this “one side of the housing” is the same as the “one side of the housing” introduced in claim 12. For the purposes of examination, the “one side of the housing” is being examined as not having to be the same. Appropriate clarification/correction is requested. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-2 and 7-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over T. Liu (CN 112450487, reference to US 2022/0175024) in view of Reevell (US 2019/0380391) and Q. Liu (US 2016/0192709). Regarding claim 1, T. Liu discloses an aerosol-forming apparatus (Figure 1, entire device shown, [0023]), comprising: a vaporization assembly (Figures 1 and 3, at least assembly of heating cup 2, silicone thermal insulator 8, and magnetic induction coil 13 and Reevell’s susceptor (see below), as well as other parts presented in further claims, [0024]-[0025]), comprising: a storage body having a storage vaporization cavity configured to store aerosol-forming substrate (Figure 3, heating cup 2 holds smoke material, [0025]); and a heating body configured to heat and vaporize the aerosol-forming substrate when power is applied (Figure 3, magnetic induction coil 13 heats up heating cup 2 to atomize smoke material, [0025]). T. Liu fails to explicitly disclose that the storage body is for holding a liquid. Q. Liu teaches a similar electronic hookah device wherein the hookah includes a liquid storage assembly (see Figure 6 and [0066]-[0067]). Q. Liu also teaches that having a hookah with a liquid storage device allows for the liquid to have to be replaced much less frequently than traditional electronic cigarettes and allows for a much larger amount of smoke to be atomized [0003]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified T. Liu to incorporate the teachings of Q. Liu to have the storage body store liquid because doing so would allow for the hookah to have the liquid require to be replaced much less frequently than traditional electronic cigarettes and allows for a much larger amount of smoke to be atomized [0003]. T. Liu further fails to explicitly disclose wherein the heating body is slidably connected to the liquid storage body between a first location and a second location, wherein the heating body is located outside the aerosol-forming substrate when the heating body is located at the first location, and wherein at least a part of the heating body protrudes into the aerosol-forming substrate when the heating body is located at the second location. Reevell teaches a similar aerosol generating device with inductive heating wherein the heating body is slidably connected to the liquid storage body between a first location and a second location, wherein the heating body is located outside the aerosol-forming substrate when the heating body is located at the first location, and wherein at least a part of the heating body protrudes into the aerosol-forming substrate when the heating body is located at the second location (Figures 1 and 2, susceptor 20 (heating body) is shown inserted into aerosol forming substrate 31 in Figure 1 and outside substrate 30 in Figure 2, [0054] and also see [0056] susceptor is displaceable (i.e. slidable) between at least two positions). Reevell also teaches that this helps to make the susceptor reusable and easily accessible for preparation purposes such as cleaning [0004]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified T. Liu to incorporate the teachings of Reevell to replace the air nozzle of T. Liu (Figure 3, air nozzle 1, [0025]) with a removable susceptor that is movable between positions inside and outside the aerosol-generating substrate such as the one taught in Reevell because doing so would allow for the susceptor to be reusable and easily accessible for preparation purposes such as cleaning, as recognized by Reevell [0004]. Regarding claim 2, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vaporization assembly further comprises: a cover body disposed at a port of the liquid storage vaporization cavity so as to seal the liquid storage vaporization cavity (T. Liu, Figure 3, silicone thermal insulator 8, [0024]), and having a through hole in communication with the liquid storage vaporization cavity (T. Liu, Figures 1 and 3, hole in silicone thermal insulator 8 communicates with inside of heating cup 2, [0024]-[0025]), and wherein the heating body comprises an extension part that penetrates through the through hole (Reevell, extension part would be support section 22 in the combination of T. Liu and Reevell presented in claim 1 above, Figure 2 and [0058]), wherein a heating part that is connected to the extension part and located in the liquid storage vaporization cavity (Reevell, heating section 21, Figure 2 and [0054]) , and wherein the extension part is slidably connected to the liquid storage body through the through hole for the heating part to disengage from or protrude into the aerosol-forming substrate (Reevell, susceptor 20 removable from substrate 31 of article and would move through silicone thermal insulator of T. Liu in the combination, Figures 1 and 2 and [0054]). Regarding claim 7, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 2, wherein the vaporization assembly further comprises a sealing member sleeved on an outer surface of the liquid storage body for fixing the cover body and sealing a connection location between the cover body and the liquid storage body (T. Liu, Figures 1 and 3, the inside of the silicone thermal insulator 8 performs this function by sealing the outside of heating cup and the outside of silicone thermal insulator 8, [0024]-[0025]). Regarding claim 8, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 1, wherein the vaporization assembly further comprises a cooling body detachably connected to the liquid storage body for cooling an aerosol generated by the heating body through vaporization (T. Liu, right side of Figures 4 and 5 (“second tube body”) including glass mouthpiece 3, [0025]. Also, while T. Liu may not explicitly disclose “cooling” the device of T. Liu and the claimed device appear to be very similar and perform the same function). Regarding claim 9, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 8, wherein the cooling body comprises: a connecting part connected to the liquid storage body and in communication with the liquid storage vaporization cavity (T. Liu, Figure 4, glass tube 21-1 is in communication with heating cup 2, [0025]); and a cooling part in communication with the connecting part and configured to accommodate condensate (T. Liu, right side and below glass mouthpiece 3 of Figures 4 and 5 (“second tube body”) may hold condensate and is therefore “configured to”, [0025]). Regarding claim 10, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a power supply assembly detachably connected to the vaporization assembly to supply power to the vaporization assembly (T. Liu, Figure 1, housing 18, and parts 4-20 and 22-30 (everything not shown in Figure 4) and is detachable as shown in Figure 1, [0024]). Regarding claim 11, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 10, wherein the power supply assembly comprises: a housing having an accommodating cavity (T. Liu, Figure 1, housing 18 with the accommodating cavity being the inside, [0024]); a battery accommodated in the accommodating cavity and configured to provide electric energy (T. Liu, Figure 1, battery 22, [0024]); a circuit board accommodated in the accommodating cavity and connected to the battery (T. Liu, Figure 1, electrode plate 27, [0024]); and a coil formed in a circumferential direction of the heating body and in electric communication with the circuit board (T. Liu, Figure 1, magnetic induction coil 13, [0024]), the coil being configured to generate a magnetic field when power is applied so as to heat up the heating body by electromagnetic induction (T. Liu, see [0025]). Regarding claim 12, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 11, wherein a first recession part is formed on a surface of one side of the housing (T. Liu, Figures 1 and 3, top left of housing 18 is recessed, [0025]), wherein the coil is disposed on an inner surface of the first recession part in a circumferential direction of the first recession part (T. Liu, Figures 1 and 3, top left of housing 18 is recessed and holds magnetic induction coil 13, [0025]), and wherein at least a part of the liquid storage body and at least a part of the heating body are located in the first recession part so as to heat up the heating body by electromagnetic induction when the coil is energized (T. Liu, Figure 1, heating cup 2 of T. Liu and susceptor 20 of Reevell would be inside the “recession part” and therefore the coil in the combination presented in the rejection of claim 1 above). Regarding claim 13, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 12, wherein a second recession part is further formed on the surface of one side of the housing (T. Liu, Figure 1, see indent/recession on right side of housing 18, [0025]), wherein the vaporization assembly further comprises a cooling body comprising a cooling part in communication with the liquid storage vaporization cavity (T. Liu, right side of Figures 4 and 5 (“second tube body”) including glass mouthpiece 3, [0025]. Also, while T. Liu may not explicitly disclose “cooling” the device of T. Liu and the claimed device appear to be very similar and perform the same function), and wherein at least a part of the cooling part is accommodated in the second recession part so as to fix the cooling body (T. Liu, right side of Figures 4 and 5 (“second tube body”) including glass mouthpiece 3 is shown in the “second recession part” as presented above in Figure 2, [0025]). Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over T. T. Liu (CN 112450487, reference to US 2022/0175024) in view of Reevell (US 2019/0380391) and Q. Liu (US 2016/0192709) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Chung (US 2015/0216234). Regarding claim 5, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 2, as set forth above. Modified T. Liu fails to disclose wherein the vaporization assembly further comprises an elastic member configured to provide an acting force toward the first location to the heating body when the heating body is located at the second location. Chung teaches a similar electronic cigarette that further comprises an elastic member configured to provide an acting force toward the first location to the heating body when the heating body is located at the second location (Figures 1-3, air intake opening stem 21 is mounted on a spring (the “elastic member”) which biases the air intake opening stem 1 into a closed position (meaning it forces it toward a “first location” (in this case closed)), [0057]). Chung also teaches that this bias spring can allow for the walls of the retainer to be scaped clean with each depression of the air intake opening stem [0057]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified T. Liu to incorporate the teachings of Chung to provide a biasing spring close to the opening of the device on the “heating body” (susceptor 20 of Reevell) because doing so would allow for the walls of the retainer (where the aerosol generating material is held) to be scaped clean with each depression of the air intake opening stem (or in this case the “heating body” (susceptor 20 of Reevell)), as recognized by Chung [0057]. Regarding claim 6, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 5, wherein the heating body further comprises a stop that circumferentially extends at an end that is of the extension part and that is away from the heating part (Reevell, Figures 2 and 4, mouthpiece 12 acts as a stop and is away from heating section 21 and extends from support section 22 (“extension part”), [0053]-[0054] and [0058]), wherein the elastic member is sleeved on the extension part (Reevell and Chung, when combined as presented above, the spring of Chung would be sleeved on the support section 22 of Reevell, [0058] of Reevell), wherein one end of the elastic member abuts against the stop (Reevell and Chung, when combined as presented above, the spring of Chung would be abut the mouthpiece 12 of Reevell, [0058] of Reevell), and wherein an other end of the elastic member abuts against the cover body (Reevell, Chung, and T. Liu when combined as presented above, the spring of Chung would abut against the silicone thermal insulator 8 of T. Liu when everything is combined as presented above, [0024] of T. Liu). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 3, modified T. Liu discloses the aerosol-forming apparatus of claim 2, as set forth above. However, modified T. Liu fails to disclose wherein the cover body has a protrusion on a surface of the side facing the liquid storage body, the protrusion having a chute in communication with the through hole, wherein a part of the heating body that protrudes into the liquid storage vaporization cavity has a slider, the slider being configured to move along the chute, and the slider being detached from the chute when the heating body is located at the second location. Additionally, there is no reason or other prior art to further modify T. Liu (or Reevell) to reach these limitations without impermissible hindsight. Claim 4 is allowable due to its dependence on claim 3. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Adam Z. Baratz whose telephone number is (703)756-1613. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6:30 - 4:30 CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael H. Wilson can be reached at 571-270-3882. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.Z.B./Examiner, Art Unit 1747 /Michael H. Wilson/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12420336
ANTI-FRETTING COATING COMPOSITION AND COATED COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Patent 12417853
ENGINEERED SIC-SIC COMPOSITE AND MONOLITHIC SIC LAYERED STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Patent 12418039
MEMBRANE ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Patent 12410882
VACUUM ADIABATIC BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 09, 2025
Patent 12397261
METHOD FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL HYDROGEN SEPARATION FROM NATURAL-GAS PIPELINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+15.2%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 551 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month