Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/354,804

Folding Travel Mirror Device

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Examiner
TALLMAN, ROBERT E
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
613 granted / 753 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
782
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 753 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/19/23 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang (US 2004/0008434 A1) in view of Nuculaj (US 9,375,064 B1). Regarding claim 1 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12 ) a folding travel mirror device comprising: a first mirror comprised of a rear surface, the rear surface comprised of a first fastener; a second mirror (20; para. 0052); a hinge (18) attached to a bottom edge of a first mirror and to a top edge of the second mirror (para. 0052); Yang does not teach a telescopic support member comprised of a locking member. Nuculaj teaches a telescopic support member comprised of a locking member (col. lines 55-65). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the are to have modified the travel mirror as taught by Yang with a telescopic frame as taught by Nuculaj for the benefit of greater stability in the standing mode. Yang as modified by teaches a support arm (50) attached to the telescopic support member via a telescopic member that attaches to a pivot point (para. 0069). Regarding claim 2 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror, where the first mirror is comprised of a handle (24; para. 0052). Regarding claim 3 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror, where the hinge is comprised of a locking hinge (22; para. 0054). Regarding claim 4 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror, where the hinge has a 180-degree range of motion (para. 0055-0056). Regarding claim 5 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror, where the locking member is comprised of a locking button or a twisting lock (para. 0054). Regarding claim 6 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror further comprised of a second fastener that secures the folding travel mirror device in a folded position (para. 0055). Regarding claim 7 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror, where the second fastener is comprised of a hook and loop strap, a snap button strap, or a magnetic strap (para. 0055). Regarding claim 8 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device comprising: a first mirror comprised of a rear surface, the rear surface comprised of a first fastener; a second mirror (20; para. 0052); Yang does not teach a telescopic support member comprised of a locking member. Nuculaj teaches a telescopic support member comprised of a locking member (col. lines 55-65). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the are to have modified the travel mirror as taught by Yang with a telescopic frame as taught by Nuculaj for the benefit of greater stability in the standing mode. Yang as modified by teaches a support arm (50) attached to the telescopic support member via a telescopic member that attaches to a pivot point Regarding claim 9 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, where the first fastener attaches to the rear surface via a second pivot point (para. 0054). Regarding claim 10 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, ecept where the first fastener is comprised of a first clip and a second clip (90; ). Nuculaj teaches where the first fastener is comprised of a first clip and a second clip (col.4, lines 18-26). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the are to have modified the travel mirror as taught by Yang with a telescopic frame as taught by Nuculaji for the benefit of greater stability in the standing mode. Regarding claim 11 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, except where the telescoping support member is comprised of an opening. Nuculaj teaches where the telescoping support member is comprised of an opening (92; col.4, lines 18-26). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the are to have modified the travel mirror as taught by Yang with a telescopic frame as taught by Nuculaj for the benefit of greater stability in the standing mode. Regarding claim 12 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, except where the opening receives the first clip. Nuculaj teaches where the opening receives the first clip (col. 4, lines 18-26). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the are to have modified the travel mirror as taught by Yang with a telescopic frame as taught by Nuculaj for the benefit of greater stability in the standing mode. Regarding claim 13 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, where the first pivot point is comprised of a hinge or a locking dial (22; para. 0054). Regarding claim 14 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, where the first mirror is comprised of a first handle (24; para. 0052). Regarding claim 15 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, where the second mirror is comprised of a second handle. Regarding claim 16 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device further comprised of a second fastener (para. 0055). Regarding claim17 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, where the second fastener is comprised of a hook and loop strap, a snap button strap, or a magnetic strap (para. 0055). Regarding claim 18 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a folding travel mirror device, where the hinge has a 180-degree range of motion (para. 0055-0056). Regarding claim 19 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a method of using a folding travel mirror device, the method comprising the following steps: providing a folding travel mirror device comprised of a first mirror comprised of a fastener, the first mirror attached to a second mirror via a hinge (20; para. 0052), Yang does not teach a support member comprised of a locking mechanism and a support arm; unfolding the first mirror and the second mirror; expanding the support member to a desired height and locking the support member at said height via the locking mechanism Nuculaj teaches a support member comprised of a locking mechanism and a support arm; unfolding the first mirror and the second mirror; expanding the support member to a desired height and locking the support member at said height via the locking mechanism (col. lines 55-65). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the are to have modified the travel mirror as taught by Yang with a telescopic frame as taught by for the benefit of greater stability in the standing mode. Yang as modified by Nuculaj teaches attaching the fastener to a first end of the support member; and positioning a lip of the support arm underneath a bottom edge of the second mirror by moving the support arm about a pivot point (para. 0069). Regarding claim 20 Yang teaches (figs.1, 3, 5, and 7-12) a method of using a folding travel mirror, where the hinge is comprised of a locking hinge (para. 0054). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Further foldable mirror systems related to the current application include Nottage (US 8651676 B2), Miller (US 2,124,146), Isler (US 7,347,573 B1), McKelvey et. al. (US 2020/0093242 A1) and McDonald (US 12,004,632,B1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E TALLMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3958. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 a.m. -6 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Robert E. Tallman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585097
OPTICAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571986
HELIOSTAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566281
MICROLENS ARRAY FOR ACQUIRING MULTI-FOCUS PLENOPTIC IMAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560801
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION MODULE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554145
LIGHT DIFFRACTION ELEMENT UNIT, MULTISTAGE LIGHT DIFFRACTION DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR MULTISTAGE LIGHT DIFFRACTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 753 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month