Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/354,952

RESONANCE DEVICE, COLLECTIVE BOARD, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR RESONANCE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Priority
Feb 05, 2021 — JP 2021-017624 +1 more
Examiner
ROSENAU, DEREK JOHN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
982 granted / 1264 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1281
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1264 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 14-30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 5 August 2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of the invention of group I in the reply filed on 5 August 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 7-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takahashi et al. (US 2013/0328450) in view of Morita (US 2012/0025672). With respect to claim 1, Takahashi et al. discloses a resonance device (Figs 1-2) comprising: a first substrate (item 130) including a resonator (item 131) including an upper electrode and a lower electrode (items 134); and a second substrate (item 120) bonded on a side of the first substrate (Figs 1-2), the second substrate including: a plate-shaped base member (item 120), a first power supply terminal (items 124) on a side of the base member opposite to the first substrate and electrically connected to the upper electrode (Fig 1-2), wherein the first substrate includes: a first inner wire (items 133) that electrically connects the upper electrode to the first power supply terminal, and a first coupling wire (items 135) connected to the first inner wire and having an end portion located at an outer edge of the first substrate (Figs 1-2). Takahashi et al. does not disclose a ground terminal on the side of the base member opposite to the first substrate and electrically connected to the lower electrode. While Takahashi et al. discusses the use of a ground terminal (paragraph 75), it is silent with respect to location and arrangement of the ground terminal. Morita teaches a piezoelectric resonator device that includes a ground terminal on the side of the base member opposite to the first substrate and electrically connected to the lower electrode (Paragraph 37). Before the effective filing, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the ground terminal arrangement of Morita with the resonator device of Takahashi et al. for the benefit of providing improved protection from electrical damage by providing a ground for the resonator device (Fig 1 an paragraph 37 of Morita) and as Takahashi et al. itself recognizes the desirability for a ground terminal (paragraph 76 of Takahashi et al.). With respect to claim 2, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 1. Takahashi et al. discloses that the first substrate further includes a piezoelectric thin film (item 131) between the upper electrode and the lower electrode. With respect to claim 3, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 2. Takahashi et al. discloses that the upper electrode and the first coupling wire are integrally provided on the piezoelectric thin film Figs 1-2). With respect to claim 4, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 1. Takahashi et al. discloses that the first coupling wire is continuous from one end to the other end (Figs 1-2) With respect to claim 7, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 1. Takahashi et al. discloses that the second substrate further includes a second power supply terminal on the side of the base member opposite to the first substrate (Figs 1-2), electrically connected to the upper electrode, and insulated from the first power supply terminal (Figs 1-2) With respect to claim 8, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 7. Takahashi et al. discloses that the first substrate includes: a second inner wire that electrically connects the upper electrode to the second power supply terminal, and a second coupling wire connected to the second inner wire and having an end portion located at the outer edge of the first substrate (Figs 1-2). With respect to claim 9, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 1. Takahashi et al. discloses a frame-shaped bonding portion (item 132) that bonds the first substrate to the second substrate to each other, wherein the first substrate further includes a protective film (item 140) covering the upper electrode and the first coupling wire (Figs 1-2). With respect to claim 10, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 9. Takahashi et al. discloses that the first coupling wire intersects the bonding portion with the protective film interposed therebetween (Figs 1-2). With respect to claim 11, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 10. Takahashi et al. discloses that the bonding portion includes a coupling member (item 133) extending to an outer edge of the resonance device, and wherein the lower electrode is electrically connected to the coupling member (Figs 1-2). With respect to claim 12, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 1. Takahashi et al. discloses a bonding portion (item 132) that comprises a rectangular ring shape and bonds the first substrate to the second substrate (Figs 1-2). With respect to claim 13, the combination of Takahashi et al. and Morita discloses the resonance device according to claim 12. Takahashi et al. discloses that the bonding portion includes a coupling member (item 140) disposed at a corner portion of the bonding portion and that extends to the outer edge of the first substrate (Figs 1-2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art does not disclose or suggest “wherein the first coupling wire is discontinuous” in combination with the remaining elements of claim 5. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Derek John Rosenau whose telephone number is (571)272-8932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7 am to 5:30 pm Central Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at (571) 270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEREK J ROSENAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750030
BOUNDARY ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE WITH MULTI-LAYER PIEZOELECTRIC SUBSTRATE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750029
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744509
MULTILAYER PIEZOELECTRIC SUBSTRATE DEVICE WITH POLYCRYSTALLINE SUBSTRATE
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744021
APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745567
PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+8.0%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1264 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month