Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/355,553

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CORRECTING MATERIAL-INDUCED EFFECTS IN CT IMAGES

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Examiner
BARNES, TED W
Art Unit
2682
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Siemens Healthineers AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
381 granted / 467 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
482
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
64.7%
+24.7% vs TC avg
§102
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 467 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Art Unit – Location The Art Unit location of your application in the USPTO may have changed. To aid in correlating any papers for this application, all further correspondence regarding this application should be directed to Art Unit 2682. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-22 are rejected under 35 USC 101 Abstract Idea. The claimed invention is directed to an Abstract Idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s The claim recites a method for correcting material-induced effects in CT images, comprising: providing a CT scan dataset including CT scan data of an object at at least two different energies; calculating a plurality of first material density values for a first substance type from the CT scan data of the CT scan dataset; calculating a plurality of correction factors based on the plurality of first material density values, wherein each correction factor is assigned to a second material density value for a second substance type; and calculating CT images from the plurality of first and second material density values, wherein at least one of the CT images is corrected via the plurality of correction factors. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because The steps of providing a CT scan dataset and calculating is a process that, under its broadest reasonable interpretation, covers performance of the limitation in the mind and using a calculator to calculating density values. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because: Step 1. The Invention is related to a Process, Machine, or an Article of Manufacturing. Step 2A. Prong 1. The Abstract Idea is a Mental Process and a Mathematical Concept. Prong 2. There are no additional claimed elements which integrate into a practical application. The claims appear to merely calculate density values. Step 2B. There are no additional elements that amount to significantly more to improve CT technology. Please refer to MPEP 2016.04(d)(1) that a conclusory statement in the specification cannot be relied upon to establish a significant improvement. Details are necessary to be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art or a technical field. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 24 and 25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 23 is allowed. The following is an Examiner' s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest reference of record is Chen (US 2011/0064292 A1). In the Applicant' s independent claim 23 the reference of Chen does not teach: calculate a plurality of first material density values for a first substance type based on the CT scan data of the CT scan dataset, the plurality of first material density values being spatially resolved material density values; calculate a plurality of correction factors based on the plurality of first material density values, wherein each correction factor is assigned to a second material density value, among a plurality of second material density values, for a second substance type, and calculate CT images based on the plurality of first material density values and the plurality of second material density values, wherein at least one of the CT images is corrected via the plurality of correction factors. Chen fails to directly anticipate or render the above underlined limitations obvious (to be used with other claimed limitations). Any comments considered necessary by the Applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” No prior art rejections are provided at this time. Relevant Prior Art Allmendinger (US 2017/0086769 A1) Abstract A method is for generating X-ray image data of an examination object with reduced calcium blooming. The X-ray image data is based on X-ray projection data acquired with an energy-selective X-ray detector and in respect of at least two energy windows. An embodiment of the method includes determining a calcium content in the X-ray projection data by way of a base material analysis, the calcium content describing the calcium-determined part of the X-ray attenuation caused by the examination object; generating a mixed X-ray projection data record with calcium content suppressed by way of a weighting factor of less than one; and reconstructing the X-ray image data from the mixed projection data record by applying a reconstruction algorithm. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TED W BARNES whose telephone number is (571) 270-1785. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benny Tieu can be reached at 571-272-7490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TED W. BARNES/ Ph.D. Electrical Engineering Primary Examiner Art Unit 2682 /TED W BARNES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2682
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599444
SURGICAL IMAGE PROVIDING METHOD USING SURGICAL ROBOT, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597156
ANALYZING SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AND MEASURING SOLAR PANEL MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586175
Apparatus, system and method for determining a match condition for a printed circuit board to a stencil
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12547356
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12535587
OBJECT TRACKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 467 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month