Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/355,923

LENS MODULE AND CAMERA MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Priority
Aug 11, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0100808 +1 more
Examiner
HALL, ELIZABETH MARY CAMPBEL
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
24 granted / 36 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/2/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-19 as they pertain to the prior art have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection, as necessitated by amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-11, 14-15, 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hsu US 20110164326 (hereinafter “Hsu”). Regarding claim 1, Hsu teaches a lens module comprising: a lens barrel (Hsu fig. 4 – 12 which includes 14); a plurality of lenses comprising at least one internal lens disposed inside the lens barrel (Hsu fig. 4 – 15 which includes 151 and 152 within 14 and 12, see also para. 0037), and an external lens fixed to a first end of the lens barrel (Hsu fig. 4 – 158 within 13, 13 is fixed to 12, see also para. 0034 and 0036); and a lens holder (Hsu fig. 4 - 13) comprising: a holder body (Hsu fig. 4 – 13, 134, 1341) surrounding the first end of the lens barrel (Hsu fig. 4 – 134 and 1341 surround the first end of 12 facing 13) in a direction perpendicular to a direction of an optical axis (Hsu fig. 4-5) and contacting a surface of the first end of the lens barrel (12) facing in the direction of the optical axis of the lens barrel (12) to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below); and a lens support extending from an inner circumferential surface of the holder body (13, 134, 1341) in a direction intersecting the optical axis and contacting an edge of the external lens to support the external lens (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below, showing a lens support extending from an inner circumferential surface of the holder body), PNG media_image1.png 474 661 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the lens barrel (12) protrudes out of the holder body (13, 134, 1341) in the direction of the optical axis (Hsu fig. 4). Regarding claim 2, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 1, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens barrel (12) is disposed so that light passing through the plurality of lenses (15) is incident on an image sensor unit (Hsu fig. 5 - 21), and the external lens (158) is disposed closer to the image sensor unit (21) than the at least one internal lens (Hsu fig. 5 – 158 is disposed closer to 21 than 15). Regarding claim 3, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 2, and Hsu further teaches wherein the edge of the external lens (158) is bonded to the lens support and fixed to the lens support (Hsu para. 0038 – 158 is mounted on and fixed to 13). Regarding claim 4, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 2, and Hsu further teaches wherein the inner circumferential surface of the holder body (13, 134, 1341) is parallel to the optical axis (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below showing the inner circumferential surface), and PNG media_image2.png 474 701 media_image2.png Greyscale the lens support has a ring shape (Hsu fig. 4 shows 158 being supported in 13 in a ring shape, and annotated fig. 5 below shows the labeled lens support) and extends perpendicular to the inner circumferential surface of the holder body (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below). PNG media_image3.png 525 661 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 4, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens holder (13) further comprises a barrel support into which the first end of the lens barrel is inserted (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below, 12 would be inserted to 134 as shown by 123 and 1231 on 12), and PNG media_image4.png 452 565 media_image4.png Greyscale the barrel support is adjacent to the inner circumferential surface of the holder body (13, 134, 1341) and contacts the surface of the first end of the lens barrel (12) facing in the direction of the optical axis to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below, showing the barrel support adjacent to the inner circumferential surface of 13, 134, 1341 and contacting the first end of 12). PNG media_image5.png 558 596 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 5, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens support is disposed closer to the image sensor unit (21) than the barrel support (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below, the labeled lens support is disposed closer to 21 than the labeled barrel support), and PNG media_image6.png 503 701 media_image6.png Greyscale the lens support protrudes closer to the optical axis than the barrel support (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 above). Regarding claim 7, Hsu teaches an electronic device (Hsu para. 0005) comprising the lens module of claim 1 (see above claim 1 rejection over Hsu). Regarding claim 8, Hsu teaches a camera module comprising: a lens module (Hsu fig. 3 – 12, 14, 15) comprising a lens barrel (Hsu fig. 4 – 12, 14), a plurality of lenses (Hsu fig. 4 – 15 within 14 and 12) fixed to the lens barrel (Hsu para. 0037), and a lens holder (Hsu fig. 4 – 13, 134, 1341) surrounding a first end of the lens barrel (Hsu fig. 4 – 134 and 1341 surround the first end of 12 and 14 which faces and contacts 13) in a direction perpendicular to a direction of an optical axis (Hsu fig. 4) and contacting a surface of the first end of the lens barrel (12) facing in the direction of the optical axis of the lens barrel to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below, showing 13, 134, 1341 which surrounds and contacts the first end of 12); and PNG media_image7.png 452 565 media_image7.png Greyscale a lens driving device (Hsu fig. 3 – 16, 17) configured to move the lens module (Hsu para. 0037), wherein the plurality of lenses (15) comprises at least one internal lens disposed inside the lens barrel (Hsu fig. 5 – 15 which includes 151 and 152), and an external lens (Hsu fig. 5 - 158) fixed to the first end of the lens barrel (Hsu fig. 2), and the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) comprises a lens support (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below) contacting an edge of the external lens (158) to support the external lens (Hsu fig. 4 – 158 within 13, 13 is fixed to 12, see also para. 0034, 0036, and 0038), and PNG media_image1.png 474 661 media_image1.png Greyscale the lens barrel (12) protrudes out of the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) in the direction of the optical axis (Hsu fig. 4). Regarding claim 9, Hsu teaches the camera module of claim 8, and Hsu further teaches further comprising an image sensor unit (Hsu fig. 5 - 21) configured to convert light incident through the plurality of lenses (15) into an electrical signal (Hsu fig. 5), wherein the external lens (158) is disposed closer to the image sensor unit (21) than the at least one internal lens (Hsu fig. 5 – 158 is disposed closer to 21 than 15). Regarding claim 10, Hsu teaches the camera module of claim 9, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) comprises a holder body (Hsu fig. 4-5 – 13, 134, 1341) comprising an inner circumferential surface that is parallel to the optical axis (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below showing the inner circumferential surface), PNG media_image8.png 558 701 media_image8.png Greyscale the lens support has a ring shape (Hsu fig. 4 shows 158 being supported in 13 in a ring shape, and annotated fig. 5 below shows the labeled lens support) extending from the inner circumferential surface of the holder body in a direction intersecting the optical axis (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below), and PNG media_image3.png 525 661 media_image3.png Greyscale the external lens (158) is bonded to the lens support to fix the edge of the external lens (158) to the lens support (Hsu para. 0038 – the edges of 158 are mounted on and fixed to 13, see also annotated Hsu fig. 5 above). Regarding claim 11, Hsu teaches the camera module of claim 10, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) further comprises a barrel support into which the first end of the lens barrel is inserted (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below, 12 would be inserted to 134 as shown by 123 and 1231 on 12), PNG media_image4.png 452 565 media_image4.png Greyscale the barrel support is adjacent to the inner circumferential surface of the holder body (13, 134, 1341) and contacts the surface of the first end of the lens barrel (12) facing in the direction of the optical axis to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below, showing the barrel support adjacent to the inner circumferential surface of 13, 134, 1341 and contacting the first end of 12), and PNG media_image5.png 558 596 media_image5.png Greyscale the lens support protrudes closer to the optical axis than the barrel support (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 above). Regarding claim 14, Hsu teaches an electronic device (Hsu para. 0005) comprising the lens module of claim 8 (see above claim 8 rejection over Hsu). Regarding claim 15, Hsu teaches an electronic device comprising: a lens module (Hsu fig. 3 - 1) comprising: a lens barrel comprising a plurality of lenses (Hsu fig. 4 – 12 including 14, which includes 15 and 158, see also para. 0038); and a lens holder (Hsu fig. 4 – 13, 134, 1341) supporting the lens barrel (12) and surrounding a first end of the lens barrel (12) in a direction perpendicular to a direction of an optical axis (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below, showing 13, 134, 1341 which surrounds and supports the first end of 12); PNG media_image7.png 452 565 media_image7.png Greyscale wherein the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) comprises: a flange protruding from an inner circumferential surface of the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) in a direction intersecting the optical axis of the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below); and PNG media_image9.png 558 661 media_image9.png Greyscale a barrel support contacting a surface of the lens barrel (12) facing in the direction of the optical axis to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 4 below); PNG media_image4.png 452 565 media_image4.png Greyscale the flange contacts an edge of one of the plurality of lenses (15 including 158) to support the one of the plurality of lenses (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below), PNG media_image10.png 474 661 media_image10.png Greyscale a width of the flange in the direction intersecting the optical axis is greater than a width of the barrel support in the direction intersecting the optical axis (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below, the width of the labeled flange is greater than the width of the labeled barrel support), and PNG media_image11.png 503 701 media_image11.png Greyscale the lens barrel (12) protrudes out of the lens holder (13, 134, 1341) in the direction of the optical axis (Hsu fig. 4). Regarding claim 17, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 1, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens support contacts a surface of the edge of the external lens (158) facing in the direction of the optical axis to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below). PNG media_image1.png 474 661 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 8, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens support contacts a surface of the edge of the external lens (158) facing in the direction of the optical axis to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below). PNG media_image1.png 474 661 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, Hsu teaches the lens module of claim 15, and Hsu further teaches wherein the lens support contacts a surface of the edge of the external lens (158) facing in the direction of the optical axis to support the lens barrel (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below). PNG media_image12.png 474 661 media_image12.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsu as applied to claim 15 above, and further in view of Warashina et. al US 20170104903 (hereinafter “Warashina” of record). Regarding claim 16, Hsu teaches the electronic device of claim 15, and Hsu further teaches wherein the edge of the one of the plurality of lenses (158) is fixed to the flange (see annotated Hsu fig. 5 below). PNG media_image12.png 474 661 media_image12.png Greyscale Hsu does not teach a bonding material. In the same field of endeavor, Warashina teaches a bonding material (Warashina para. 0054) for the purpose of ensuring no foreign matters such as particles enter into a space (Warashina para. 0054). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a bonding material as taught by Warashina in the electronic device of Hsu in order to ensure no foreign matters such as particles enter into a space (Warashina para. 0054). Claims 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsu as applied to claim 8 above, further in view of Rhee et. al US 20200050013 (hereinafter “Rhee” of record). Regarding claim 12, Hsu teaches the camera module of claim 8, and Hsu further teaches further comprising: a housing (Hsu fig. 4 - 12) having an inner space (Hsu fig. 3 - 122); and a carrier (Hsu fig. 4-5 - 14) disposed in the inner space of the housing (Hsu fig. 3); wherein the lens module (12, 14, 15) is disposed in the carrier (Hsu fig. 3-5 – 15 disposed in 14), wherein the lens driving device (16, 17) comprises: an autofocus (AF) driving unit (Hsu fig. 3 – 16, 17) configured to move the lens module (12, 14, 15) and the carrier (14) relative to the housing (12) in the direction of the optical axis (Hsu para. 0037). Hsu does not specifically teach an optical image stabilization (OIS) driving unit configured to drive the lens module within the carrier to move in a first direction or a second direction perpendicular to the optical axis and perpendicular to each other. In the same field of endeavor, Rhee teaches an optical image stabilization (OIS) driving unit (Rhee fig. 2 - 500) configured to move the lens module relative to the carrier (Rhee fig. 2 - 300) either one or both of a first direction perpendicular to the optical axis and a second direction perpendicular to the optical axis and perpendicular to both the first direction and the optical axis (Rhee para. 0059-0061) for the purpose of correcting blurring of an image or a shaking motion of a moving image due to factors such as hand-shake (Rhee para. 0059). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a housing, a carrier within the housing, and an OIS driving unit in order to correct blurring of an image or a shaking motion of a moving image due to factors such as hand-shake (Rhee para. 0059). Regarding claim 13, Hsu and Rhee teach the camera module of claim 12, and Rhee further teaches further comprising: a rolling guide portion (see annotated Rhee fig. 2 below, cropped to show the carrier 300) formed in a surface of the carrier facing the housing and a ball-shaped rolling portion (Rhee fig. 2, see also para. 0056) disposed on the first rolling guide portion to enable the AF driving unit (Rhee fig. 2 - 400) to move the lens module (Rhee fig. 2 - 210) and the carrier (300) relative to the housing in the direction of the optical axis direction (Rhee para. 0072); PNG media_image13.png 259 402 media_image13.png Greyscale a support frame (Rhee fig. 2 - 310) disposed between the carrier (300) and the lens module (Rhee fig. 2 – 310 sits between 210 and 300); a plurality of first guide grooves (Rhee fig. 2 – 301, 302) formed in a surface of the carrier (300) facing the support frame (310) and a first rolling member (Rhee fig. 2 – B2, B4) disposed in the plurality of first guide grooves (Rhee fig. 2) to enable the OIS driving unit to move the lens module relative to the carrier in the second direction (Rhee para. 0070, 0076); and a plurality of second guide grooves (Rhee fig. 2 - 311) formed in a surface of the support frame (310) facing the lens holder (210) and a second rolling member (Rhee fig. 2 - B3) disposed in the plurality of second guide grooves (Rhee fig. 2) to enable the OIS driving unit to move the lens module (210) relative to the carrier (300) in the first direction (Rhee para. 0071-0072). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hsu US Patent 8,213,099, patent of Hsu et. al US 20110164326. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIZABETH M HALL whose telephone number is (703)756-5795. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-5:30 pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at (571)272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIZABETH M HALL/Examiner, Art Unit 2872 /RICKY L MACK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697646
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12631871
CONTROL SYSTEM, OPTICAL DEFLECTION APPARATUS, IMAGE PROJECTION APPARATUS, MOBILE OBJECT, AND HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12578620
OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM
3y 2m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12504609
OPTICAL SYSTEM AND CAMERA MODULE COMPRISING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12505944
OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM
3y 2m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+5.9%)
3y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month