Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/355,954

BINDER, ELECTROCHEMICAL APPARATUS USING SAID BINDER, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Priority
Jan 21, 2021 — continuation of PCTCN2021073006
Examiner
APICELLA, KARIE O
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ningde Amperex Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
842 granted / 1048 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1095
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
72.4%
+32.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1048 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-20 are pending in this office action. Priority 3. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) or (f), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement 4. Information disclosure statement (IDS), submitted July 20, 2023, has been received and considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 7. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 8. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ryu et al. (US 2012/0330589 A1) in view of Mimura et al. (US 2018/0342765 A1). With regard to Claims 1 and 5, Ryu et al. disclose a binder comprising a polymer, the polymer being obtained by polymerizing a first monomer, a second monomer, a third monomer, and a fourth monomer; wherein the first monomer, the second monomer, and the third monomer are each independently 0.001-40 parts by weight of a vinyl monomer, 1-20 parts by weight of an unsaturated carboxylic acid, and 1-80 parts by weight of a (meth)acrylic acid ester (paragraph 0010), which meets the claimed limitation of a being selected from aromatic alkenyl compounds, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid salts, or ethylenically unsaturated carboxylates; and the first monomer, the second monomer, and the third monomer are different from each other; and the fourth monomer comprises a conjugated diene monomer (paragraph 023). Ryu et al. do not specifically disclose wherein the fourth monomer comprises a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least one double bond, and wherein a mass percentage of the fourth monomer in the polymer is 0.5% to 10%. Mimura et al. disclose a binder in a solid electrolyte composition, a monomer constituting the adhesive polymer comprises a ring structure of two or more rings, the ring contains a structure of any one of an aliphatic hydrocarbon ring, an unsaturated hydrocarbon ring, an aromatic ring, a heterocyclic ring, or a combination thereof, and having a mass of 10% or more and 85% or less with respect to 100% by mass of the polymer constituting the binder (paragraphs 0011-0013, 0172-0177). Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the binder of Ryu et al. to include the fourth monomer comprising a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least one double bond and wherein a mass percentage of the fourth monomer in the polymer is 0.5% to 10%, because Mimura et al. teach that this material allows for improved adsorption properties and further improves the bonding property between solid particles (paragraph 0187). With regard to Claims 2-4, Mimura et al. disclose wherein the fourth monomer comprises a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least two double bonds, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises a cyclic diene; or at least one aromatic ring-containing diene and at least one non-aromatic cyclic diene; or at least one non-aromatic monocyclic diene and at least one non-aromatic polycyclic diene, more specifically, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises the cyclic diene; and the cyclic diene comprises at least one of cyclopentadiene, cyclohexadiene, and cyclooctadiene (paragraphs 0172-0177). Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the binder of Ryu et al. to include the fourth monomer comprising a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least two double bonds, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises a cyclic diene; or at least one aromatic ring-containing diene and at least one non-aromatic cyclic diene; or at least one non-aromatic monocyclic diene and at least one non-aromatic polycyclic diene, more specifically, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises the cyclic diene; and the cyclic diene comprises at least one of cyclopentadiene, cyclohexadiene, and cyclooctadiene, because Mimura et al. teach that this material allows for improved adsorption properties and further improves the bonding property between solid particles (paragraph 0187). With regard to Claim 6, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the first monomer comprises an 6. aromatic alkenyl compound, the second monomer comprises an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid or an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid salt, and the third monomer comprises an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylate (paragraphs 0010, 0016-0023). With regard to Claim 7, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the aromatic alkenyl compound comprises at least one of styrene, α-methylstyrene, and tert-butylstyrene (paragraphs 0021-0022). With regard to Claim 8, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid or ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid salt comprises at least one of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, lithium acrylic acid, potassium acrylic acid, sodium acrylic acid, lithium methacrylic acid, potassium methacrylic acid, or sodium methacrylic acid (paragraph 0020). With regard to Claim 9, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the ethylenically unsaturated carboxylate comprises at least one of methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, isopropyl acrylate, n-butyl acrylate, hexyl acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (paragraph 0017). With regard to Claim 10, Ryu et al. disclose wherein a mass percentage of the first monomer in the polymer is 0.001-40 parts by weight, which meets the claimed limitation of 5% to 45%; a mass percentage of the second monomer in the polymer is 1-20 parts by weight, which meets the claimed limitation of 0.5% to 89.5%; and a mass percentage of the third monomer in the polymer is 1-80 parts by weight, which meets the claimed limitation of 5% to 44.5% (paragraph 0010). With regard to Claims 11 and 15, Ryu et al. disclose an electrochemical apparatus comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode, an electrolyte, and a separator, wherein at least one of the positive electrode, the negative electrode, and the separator comprises a binder (paragraphs 0038-0045); the binder comprising a polymer, the polymer being obtained by polymerizing a first monomer, a second monomer, a third monomer, and a fourth monomer; ; wherein the first monomer, the second monomer, and the third monomer are each independently 0.001-40 parts by weight of a vinyl monomer, 1-20 parts by weight of an unsaturated carboxylic acid, and 1-80 parts by weight of a (meth)acrylic acid ester (paragraph 0010), which meets the claimed limitation of a being selected from aromatic alkenyl compounds, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid salts, or ethylenically unsaturated carboxylates; and the first monomer, the second monomer, and the third monomer are different from each other; and the fourth monomer comprises a conjugated diene monomer (paragraph 023). Ryu et al. do not specifically disclose wherein the fourth monomer comprises a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least one double bond, and wherein a mass percentage of the fourth monomer in the polymer is 0.5% to 10%. Mimura et al. disclose a binder in a solid electrolyte composition, a monomer constituting the adhesive polymer comprises a ring structure of two or more rings, the ring contains a structure of any one of an aliphatic hydrocarbon ring, an unsaturated hydrocarbon ring, an aromatic ring, a heterocyclic ring, or a combination thereof, and having a mass of 10% or more and 85% or less with respect to 100% by mass of the polymer constituting the binder (paragraphs 0011-0013, 0172-0177). Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the binder of Ryu et al. to include the fourth monomer comprising a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least one double bond and wherein a mass percentage of the fourth monomer in the polymer is 0.5% to 10%, because Mimura et al. teach that this material allows for improved adsorption properties and further improves the bonding property between solid particles (paragraph 0187). With regard to Claims 12-14, Mimura et al. disclose wherein the fourth monomer comprises a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least two double bonds, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises a cyclic diene; or at least one aromatic ring-containing diene and at least one non-aromatic cyclic diene; or at least one non-aromatic monocyclic diene and at least one non-aromatic polycyclic diene, more specifically, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises the cyclic diene; and the cyclic diene comprises at least one of cyclopentadiene, cyclohexadiene, and cyclooctadiene (paragraphs 0172-0177). Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the binder of Ryu et al. to include the fourth monomer comprising a substituted or unsubstituted cyclic compound having at least two double bonds, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises a cyclic diene; or at least one aromatic ring-containing diene and at least one non-aromatic cyclic diene; or at least one non-aromatic monocyclic diene and at least one non-aromatic polycyclic diene, more specifically, wherein the cyclic compound having at least two double bonds comprises the cyclic diene; and the cyclic diene comprises at least one of cyclopentadiene, cyclohexadiene, and cyclooctadiene, because Mimura et al. teach that this material allows for improved adsorption properties and further improves the bonding property between solid particles (paragraph 0187). With regard to Claim 16, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the first monomer comprises an 6. aromatic alkenyl compound, the second monomer comprises an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid or an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid salt, and the third monomer comprises an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylate (paragraphs 0010, 0016-0023). With regard to Claim 17, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the aromatic alkenyl compound comprises at least one of styrene, α-methylstyrene, and tert-butylstyrene (paragraphs 0021-0022). With regard to Claim 18, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid or ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid salt comprises at least one of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, lithium acrylic acid, potassium acrylic acid, sodium acrylic acid, lithium methacrylic acid, potassium methacrylic acid, or sodium methacrylic acid (paragraph 0020). With regard to Claim 19, Ryu et al. disclose wherein a mass percentage of the first monomer in the polymer is 0.001-40 parts by weight, which meets the claimed limitation of 5% to 45%; a mass percentage of the second monomer in the polymer is 1-20 parts by weight, which meets the claimed limitation of 0.5% to 89.5%; and a mass percentage of the third monomer in the polymer is 1-80 parts by weight, which meets the claimed limitation of 5% to 44.5% (paragraph 0010). With regard to Claim 20, Ryu et al. disclose wherein the negative electrode comprises a negative electrode current collector and a negative electrode active substance layer, the negative electrode active substance layer comprises a negative electrode active substance, a conductive agent, and the binder (paragraphs 0060-0062). Ryu et al. do not specifically disclose a mass percentage of the binder in the negative electrode active substance layer is 0.5% to 8%. The specific mass percentage of binder in the negative electrode active substance layer is not considered to confer patentability to the claims. In the negative electrode active substance layer, stability and cost of manufacturing are variables that can be modified, among others, by adjusting said mass percentage of binder in the negative electrode active substance layer, with the layer stability and manufacturing cost both increasing as the mass percentage of binder is increased, the precise mass percentage of binder would have been considered a result effective variable by one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made would have optimized, by routine experimentation, the mass percentage of the binder in the negative electrode active substance layer of Ryu et al. to obtain the desired balance between the layer stability and cost of manufacturing (In re Boesch, 617 F.2d. 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980)), since it has been held that where the general conditions of the claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. (In re Aller, 105 USPQ 223). Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KARIE O APICELLA whose telephone number is (571)272-8614. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher can be reached at 571-270-3879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KARIE O'NEILL APICELLA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 15, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633518
FAST CHARGING AND DISCHARGING RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES BY ISOTOPE CONTROL
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633530
POSITIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD OF PREPARING SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING POSITIVE ELECTRODE INCLUDING THE POSITIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633598
ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL WITH ANODE MATERIAL IN PROTRUSION
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626985
BATTERY PACK, ELECTRICAL DEVICE, AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE MAIN BODY
2y 12m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620642
BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.4%)
3y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1048 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month