Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/357,395

Foldable Tow Dolly

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 24, 2023
Examiner
SCOTT, JACOB S
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
455 granted / 521 resolved
+35.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
527
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 521 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is the first Office action on the merits. Claims *** are currently pending. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim of priority from Provisional Application No. 63/392,156. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement of July 24, 2023 was received and reviewed. Drawings The drawings are accepted. Claim Objections Claims 1, 12, and 19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, lines 3-4, the recitation “wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform connected to . . .” is awkwardly worded. The following correction is recommended “wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform are connected to . . .”. Claim 12, lines 3-4, the recitation “wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform connected to . . .” is awkwardly worded. The following correction is recommended “wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform are connected to . . .”. Claim 19, line 5, the recitation “wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform connected to . . .” is awkwardly worded. The following correction is recommended “wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform are connected to . . .”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "each said wheel portion" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is unclear if the first and second wheel platforms are being referred to or a different structure of the invention. Clarification is required. Claim 13 recites the limitation "each said wheel portion" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is unclear if the first and second wheel platforms are being referred to or a different structure of the invention. Clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-12, and 14-20 are allowed. Claims 2 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Reasons for Indicating Allowable Subject Matter The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art fails to disclose or render obvious the combination of features recited in each of independent claims 1 and 12. Particularly, the prior art fails to disclose or render obvious “a first wheel platform and a second wheel platform, wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform connected to opposing sides of said center chassis frame; . . . further wherein said first pair of barrel locks selectively locks said first wheel platform at a first distance relative to said center chassis frame and said second pair of barrel locks selectively locks said second wheel platform at a second distance relative to said center chassis frame for securing said vehicle tow dolly in an unfolded position at a selected wheelbase corresponding to a towed vehicle”. The prior art fails to disclose or render obvious the combination of features recited in independent claim 19. Particularly, the prior art fails to disclose or render obvious “providing a vehicle tow dolly having a center chassis frame, an X-brace attachment, a tongue portion, a plurality of locking pins, a first wheel platform and a second wheel platform, wherein said first wheel platform and said second wheel platform connected to opposing sides of said center chassis frame, and further wherein each wheel platform having a pair of casters and a wheel proximal thereto for movement of said vehicle tow dolly over a road surface; removing said X-brace attachment from said center chassis frame; . . . releasing a first pair of locking pins mounted to a first side of said center chassis frame and articulating said first wheel platform to a generally vertical orientation; releasing a second pair of locking pins mounted to a second side of said center chassis frame and articulating said second wheel platform to a generally vertical orientation; and hingedly articulating said center chassis frame from a generally horizontal unfolded orientation to a generally vertical folded orientation.” Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20240083331 A1, Tow Dolly Cross Rail Assembly For Towing Vehicle E.g. Car, Has Two Outer Female Bars Telescopically Sliding Along Free Ends Of Center Male Bar For Selectively Increasing And Decreasing Length Of Cross Rail, Where Arched Configuration Of Center Male Bar Slopes Female Bars Relative To Horizontal Plane; US 20170274945 A1, TOWING SYSTEMS, see Fig. 2 showing square tubing, joints and fasteners holding the trailer together. US 20160368409 A1, Folding Dolly For Towing A Vehicle US 20130038038 A1, A collapsible hitched trailer comprised of a bed member having a center bed section, and two pivotable bed sections pivotally attached to opposite sides of the center bed section. US 20110254249 A1, Collapsible Trailer. US 7770913 B2, Collapsible Trailer And Method For Use Of Same. US 7083182 B2, Two-wheeled Recovery Trailers. US 6428035 B1, Portable Trailer For Motor Cycle, Has Front, Center, Axle And Wheel Frames, Whose Length Is Set Smaller Than The Length Of Portable Container Into Which Frames Are Stored When Disassembled. US 5342162 A, Tow Dolly. US 5326128 A, Variable-width Torsion Spring Axle. US 5016897 A, Vehicle Towing Trailer Has Pair Of Angle Irons Attached To Parallel Members Of H-shaped Frame. US 3979133 A, Foldable Trailer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB S. SCOTT whose telephone number is (571)270-3415. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACOB S. SCOTT/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594995
MOUNTING BEAM FOR VEHICLE, FRONT CABIN ASSEMBLY, VEHICLE AND OPTIMIZATION DESIGN METHOD FOR MOUNTING BEAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12565282
PEDAL WITH ADJUSTMENT DIAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558278
Assembly for translational movement of wheelchair wheels for persons with motor disabilities
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12545231
CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD OF HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539817
BACK MOUNTED MOVABLE STORAGE CHEST
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 521 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month