Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/357,519

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 24, 2023
Priority
Mar 27, 2023 — JP 2023-050272
Examiner
WONG, JOSEPH S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
499 granted / 578 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
585
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§102
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 578 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-9 and 11-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akema et al. (US 2002/0021921) in view of Noguchi et al. (US 2009/0026689) With respect to claim 1, Akema et al. disclose an image forming apparatus (as shown at least by fig. 2) comprising: a transfer unit (e.g., item(s) 6 and/or 7) configured to transfer an image to an object (e.g., “disk D”) by coming into contact with the object (D); a mounting table (e.g., “table 25”) on which the object (D) is to be mounted; a transporting unit (e.g., “disc conveyor 20”) configured to transport the mounting table (25) along a transport path; and a lift (e.g., spring(s) 87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) capable of changing a height of the mounting table (25) and configured to adjust the height of the mounting table (25) in a process of image transfer to the object (D) by the transfer unit (6 and/or 7), the lift (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) adjusting the height of the mounting table (25) such that a leading part, in a direction of transport, of the object (D) mounted on the mounting table (25) transported by the transporting unit (20) comes into contact with the transfer unit (6 and/or 7) at a position of the transport path, the position being on an upstream side in the direction of transport relative to a position where any other part of the object (D) comes into contact with the transfer unit (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claim 14, Akema et al. disclose an image forming apparatus (as shown at least by fig. 2) comprising: transferring means (e.g., item(s) 6 and/or 7) for transferring an image to an object (e.g., “disk D”) by coming into contact with the object (D); a mounting table (e.g., “table 25”) on which the object (D) is to be mounted; transporting means (e.g., “disc conveyor 20”) for transporting the mounting table (25) along a transport path; and lifting means (e.g., item(s) 87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) capable of changing a height of the mounting table (25) for adjusting the height of the mounting table (25) in a process of image transfer to the object (D) by the transferring means (6 and/or 7), the lifting means (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) adjusting the height of the mounting table (25) such that a leading part, in a direction of transport, of the object (D) mounted on the mounting table (25) transported by the transporting means (20) comes into contact with the transferring means (6 and/or 7) at a position of the transport path, the position being on an upstream side in the direction of transport relative to a position where any other part of the object (D) comes into contact with the transferring means (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With further respect to claims 1 and 11-14, Akema et al. further disclose the transferring means including an intermediate transfer roll being rotated such that a direction of movement of the roll coincides with the direction of transport of the object at a transfer position (as shown at least by fig. 2), wherein the transporting means (“disc conveyor 20”) transports the mounting table (“table 25”) along the transport path (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 3), and the lifting means (item(s) 87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) adjusts the height of the mounting table (25), the transporting means (20) and the lifting means (item(s) 87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) being configured to cooperate such that, at a position upstream of the transfer position in the direction of movement of the intermediate transfer member (6), the leading edge of the image carried by the intermediate transfer member (6) reaches the transfer position (as shown at least by figs. 2-3 and/or 12-19 and/or as discussed at least in the portion(s) of the specification associated with the previously identified figures). With further respect to claims 1 and 11-14, Akema et al. do not disclose the intermediate transfer member being a belt and therefore do not disclose the transferring means being an intermediate transfer belt that is stretched over a plurality of rollers and that is to carry an image composed of charged particles, the belt being rotated such that a direction of movement of the belt coincides with the direction of transport of the object at a transfer position; and a transfer roller servicing as one of the plurality of rollers and stretching the belt at the transfer position where the belt is closest to the object. With further respect to claims 1 and 11-14, Noguchi et al. teach the transferring means can be a roll or a belt (e.g., paragraph 110) and therefore teaches an intermediate transfer belt (e.g., item 13) that is stretched over a plurality of rollers (e.g., rollers 15, 62, 14 and/or 16) and that is to carry an image composed of charged particles, the belt (13) being rotated such that a direction of movement of the belt (13) coincides with the direction of transport of the object (e.g., item 9) at a transfer position (as shown at least by figs. 1, 3 and/or 6); and a transfer roller (e.g., transfer roller 16) servicing as one of the plurality of rollers (rollers 15, 62, 14 and/or 16) and stretching the belt (13) at the transfer position where the belt is closest to the object (as shown at least by figs. 1, 3 and/or 6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement an intermediate transfer belt as taught by Noguchi et al. for the intermediate transfer member of Akema et al. at least because there would have been a reasonable expectation of success in achieving image transfer. With respect to claim 2, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the mounting table (25) includes a seat (e.g., “disk support surface 25h” and/or the surface upon which the disk D is mounted) on which the object (D) is to be mounted and that is configured to change an inclination of the object in accordance with a state of contact between the object (D) and the transfer unit (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claim 3, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the seat (25h) is configured to change the inclination of the object (D) in accordance with a force of contact of the object (D) with the transfer unit (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claim 4, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the seat (25h) is supported by the mounting table (25) with an aid of an elastic member (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) provided on a back face of the seat, the back face being opposite a face on which the object (D) is to be mounted (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claims 5 and 6, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the seat includes: a body (e.g., surface upon which disk D is mounted) on which the object (D) is to be mounted; and a spring (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) provided at each of a plurality of positions on a back face of the body, the back face being opposite a face on which the object (D) is to be mounted (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claim 7, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the seat (25h and/or the surface upon which the disk D is mounted) is configured to change the inclination of the object in such a manner as to reduce a change in a force of contact between the object (D) and the transfer unit in the process of image transfer (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claim 8, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the seat includes: a body (25h and/or the surface upon which the disk D is mounted) on which the object (D) is to be mounted; and a support including a height changing mechanism (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) and provided at each of a plurality of positions on a back face of the body, the back face being opposite a face on which the object (D) is to be mounted (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With respect to claim 9, Akema et al. further disclose wherein, with the object (D) being mounted on the seat (25h and/or the surface upon which the disk D is mounted), if a surface of the object (D) to which the image is to be transferred is inclined relative to a surface of the transfer unit (6 and/or 7) at a transfer position, the seat changes the inclination of the object in such a manner as to reduce an inclination of the surface of the object relative to the surface of the transfer unit (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 78-112). With further respect to claim 11, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the lift (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) is configured to adjust the height of the mounting table (25) such that the leading part of the object (D) comes into contact with the intermediate transfer member in an area where the intermediate transfer member runs along the transfer roller (as shown at least by figs. 2 and/or 2-15; and/or as discussed at least in paragraph(s) 75-112). With respect to claim 12, Akema et al. further disclose wherein the lift (87a, 87b, 89a and/or 89b) is configured to adjust the height of the mounting table (25) such that the leading part of the object (D) comes into contact with the belt (as shown at least by fig. 2 and/or as discussed at least in paragraph 75) With further respect to claim 12, Akema et al. does not specifically disclose wherein the transfer unit includes a stretching roller at a position upstream of the transfer roller in the direction of movement of the belt, the stretching roller stretching the belt in cooperation with the transfer roller; and the object comes into contact with the belt in an area between the transfer roller and the stretching roller. With further respect to claim 12, Noguchi et al. teach wherein the transfer unit includes a stretching roller (e.g., roller 14) at a position upstream of the transfer roller (e.g., roller 16) in the direction of movement of the belt (13), the stretching roller (14) stretching the belt (13) in cooperation with the transfer roller (16); and the object (9) comes into contact with the belt (13) in an area between the transfer roller (16) and the stretching roller (14, as shown at least by figs. 1, 3 and/or 6 and/or as discussed at least in the portion(s) of the specification associated with the previously identified figures) . With further respect to claim 13, Akema et al. further disclose adjusting height of the mounting table such that the leading part of the object comes into contact with the transfer member at a position higher than the transfer position in the direction of movement of the transfer member (as shown at least by figs. 2-3 and/or 12-19 and/or as discussed at least in the portion(s) of the specification associated with the previously identified figures). Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akema et al. (US 2002/0021921) in view of Noguchi et al. (US 2009/0026689) in further view of Mao (US 2010/0054777) With respect to claim 15, Akema et al. and Noguchi et al. disclose the image forming apparatus of claim 1 as discussed above, and further disclose a fixing unit (e.g., item 8) configured to thermally fix the image to the object with contacting the object, using a heat source (as shown at least by figs. 1-10). With further respect to claim 15, Akema et al. and Noguchi et al. do not disclose the fixing unit being a non-contact fixing unit. With further respect to claim 15, Mao teaches a fixing unit (e.g., item 70) configured to thermally fix the image to the object without contacting the object, using a heat source or an infrared laser light (as discussed at least in paragraph 54). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use the non-contact fixing device of Mao for the fixing device of Akema et al. and Noguchi et al. at least because there would have been a reasonable expectation of success in achieving fixation. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments dated 8/13/26 have been fully considered but are now moot in view of the new grounds of rejection necessitated by amendment. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Remarks Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH S WONG whose telephone number is (571)272-8457. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter L Lindsay Jr. can be reached at (571) 272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH S WONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852 JSW
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 13, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769238
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761584
ENDLESS BELT, INTERMEDIATE TRANSFER BELT, TRANSFER DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754492
IMAGE CARRIER UNIT AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748361
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736909
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 578 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month