Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/357,623

TRACTION BATTERY PACK THERMAL BARRIER AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING TRACTION BATTERY PACK THERMAL BARRIER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 24, 2023
Examiner
LU, ZIHENG NMN
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ford Motor Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
51 granted / 61 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
90
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
95.8%
+55.8% vs TC avg
§102
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 61 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 12-20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 4/20/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fowler (US 20090155543 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Examiner notes that a preamble is generally not accorded any patentable weight where it merely recites the purpose of a process or the intended use of a structure, and where the body of the claim does not depend on the preamble for completeness but, instead, the process steps or structural limitations are able to stand alone. See In re Hirao, 535 F.2d 67, 190 USPQ 15 (CCPA 1976) and Kropa v. Robie, 187 F.2d 150, 152, 88 USPQ 478, 481 (CCPA 1951). In claim 1, the intended use of the “thermal barrier assembly” for a “traction battery pack” is not given patentable weight. Thus, as currently written, any thermal barrier assembly comprising the claimed structural limitations would read on Claim 1. Fowler teaches a thermal barrier assembly, comprising: a first outer shell (first layer 120), a second outer shell (second layer 122) adjacent the first outer shell to define an insulation cavity, an insulative material (insulation 200) sandwiched between the first outer shell and the second outer shell within the insulation cavity, and a plurality of baffles (baffles 130, 132, and 134) that extend into the insulation cavity and restrict movement of the insulative material within the insulation cavity (Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 2, Fowler teaches the thermal barrier assembly of Claim 1. The first outer shell, the second outer shell, and the insulative material provide a thermal barrier assembly that would be capable of separating two groups of battery cells within a cell stack. Regarding Claim 3, Fowler teaches the thermal barrier assembly of Claim 1. The plurality of baffles comprise a plurality of ribs of the first outer shell, a plurality of ribs of the second outer shell, or both (Abstract – the plurality of baffles are between and coupled to the first and second outer shell. Thus, they can be viewed as being part of either or both shells). Regarding Claim 10, Fowler teaches the thermal barrier assembly of Claim 1. The insulative material can be fiberless (0046). Regarding Claim 11, Fowler teaches the thermal barrier assembly of Claim 1. The first outer shell and the second outer shell can be polymer-based materials (0044). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Honda (US 20200290933 A1) in view of Choi (US 20170222283 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Honda teaches a thermal barrier assembly (Title – partition member) comprising a first outer shell and a second outer shell that is adjacent to the first outer shell to define an insulation cavity (0046, Figs. 1 and 2 – the barrier/partition is formed by joining the edges of two outer package bodies; 0047, Fig. 2 – the insulation material 110 is accommodated in an internal space 111 between the two outer package bodies). An insulative material is sandwiched between the first outer shell and the second outer shell within the insulation cavity (0047, Fig. 2 – the insulation material 110 is accommodated in an internal space 111 between the two outer package bodies). Honda does not teach a plurality of baffles that extend into the insulation cavity and restrict movement of the insulative material within the insulation cavity. Choi teaches a cooling plate used to space apart adjacent batteries (Fig. 5). The plate is hollow and comprises opposing reinforcement ribs (Fig. 2 – parts 22b and 22c). The reinforcing ribs help reduce deformation of the plate due to external impact (Abstract; 0035). Honda and Choi are considered analogous to the claimed invention as they relate to the same field of endeavor, namely spacer plates/barriers between battery cells. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the thermal barrier assembly of Honda to include the reinforcement ribs of Choi in order to help reduce deformation from external impacts. The reinforcement ribs can be viewed as a plurality of baffles that extend into the insulation cavity and restrict movement of the insulative material within the insulation cavity. Regarding Claim 2, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The first outer shell, the second outer shell, and the insulative material provide a thermal barrier assembly configured to separate a first group of battery cells within a cell stack from a second group of battery cells witin the cell stack (Fig. 6 – the partition members 1 would be capable of separating a first and second group of battery cells in a cell stack). Regarding Claim 3, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The plurality of baffles comprises a plurality of ribs of both the first and second outer shells (Choi: Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 4, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The plurality of baffles comprises a plurality of first ribs extending from the underside of the first outer shell, and a plurality of second ribs extending from an underside of the second outer shell, the plurality of first ribs contacting the plurality of second ribs to provide a plurality of subcavities (Choi: Fig. 2 – opposing ribs 22c contact each other to form subcavities 21). Regarding Claim 5, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The first outer shell comprises a first outer rim, the second outer shell comprises a second outer rim, and the first outer rim overlaps with the second outer rim (Fig. 2 – the two outer package bodies 120 comprise opposing rims that are sealed together). Regarding Claim 6, modified Honda the assembly of Claim 5. The first outer rim extends at least partially about a circumferential periphery of the first outer shell and the second outer rim extends at least partially about a circumferential periphery of the second outer shell (Honda: Figs. 1 and 2 – the rims of the first and second outer package bodies extend at least partially about a circumferential periphery of the bodies). Regarding Claim 7, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 5. The first outer rim overlaps with the second outer rim along three peripheral sides of the first outer rim (0046, 0047, Figs. 1 and 2 – the partition is formed by sealing two outer package bodies, which are rectangular in shape, together. Thus, the first outer rim would necessarily overlap with the second outer rim along four peripheral sides of the first outer rim). Regarding Claim 8, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The insulative material can be a particulate substance (Honda: 0031 – the thermal insulation material 110 includes a powdered inorganic material; 0036 – the powdered material includes particles). Regarding Claim 9, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The insulative material can be an aerogel (Honda: 0036). Regarding Claim 10, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The insulative material can be fiberless (Honda: 0032). Examiner notes that, although Honda teaches the fiberless insulation material as a non-preferred embodiment (0032 – the partition member requires fixing through a binder or the like), it has been held that "disclosed examples and preferred embodiments do not constitute a teaching away from a broader disclosure or nonpreferred embodiments" and that "a known or obvious composition does not become patentable simply because it has been described as somewhat inferior to some other product for the same use" Merck & Co. v. Biocraft Laboratories, 874 F.2d 804, 10 USPQ2d 1843 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 975 (1989): Furthermore, it has been held that "a reference may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill the art, including nonpreferred embodiments" (see MPEP 2123). Regarding Claim 11, modified Honda teaches the assembly of Claim 1. The first and second outer shells can be polymer-based materials (Honda: 0043, 0044). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZIHENG LU whose telephone number is (703)756-1077. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30 - 5 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Smith can be reached at (571) 272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZIHENG LU/Examiner, Art Unit 1752 /Maria Laios/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2023
Application Filed
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683159
POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL AND BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683157
POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL AND BATTERY
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676341
COMPOSITE SOLID POLYMER ELECTROLYTES AND ORGANIC CATHODE MATERIALS SUITABLE FOR SOLID-STATE LITHIUM BATTERIES
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658448
Electrolyte engineering methods and systems
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658437
COMPOSITE CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, CATHODE AND LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE COMPOSITE CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.2%)
3y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 61 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month