Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/358,441

TAG POSITIONING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Priority
Jan 31, 2021 — CN 202110132083.X +1 more
Examiner
RAYNAL, ASHLEY BROWN
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
37 granted / 47 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
79
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 47 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/25/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 6, 11 and 16 have been amended. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments and remarks filed on 03/25/2026 have been fully considered. Applicant’s amendments overcome the 35 U.S.C. §112(a) rejection of the claims. Applicant’s arguments provided for the 35 U.S.C. §103 rejections of claims 1-20 have been considered but are not persuasive. (A) Applicant argues, “Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest "sending, by the target tag, second signaling to the target reader/writer", wherein "the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number", wherein "the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter", and wherein "the identity of the first transmitter is usable by the target reader/writer to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which the target tag is located" as recited by independent claim 1, as amended. “Yang teaches that "the excitation antenna is installed at the set indoor boundary area." (Yang, 10009.) Yang teaches that "the label device is disposed on a positioning target in the room." (Yang, 10009.) Yang teaches that, "[d]uring the movement of the label device in any setting range of the excitation antenna, the excitation base station reads the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation antenna." (Yang, 10009.) Yang then teaches that "[t]he excitation base station also "reads the ID parameter of the excitation antenna sending the low-frequency signal." (Yang, 10009.) Yang teaches that "[t]he excitation base station "adds the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and reports the positioning signal to the server through the positioning base station." (Yang, 10009.) Yang then teaches that "[t]he "the server can determine the location of the positioning target in the indoor junction area according to the positioning signal carrying the ID parameter." (Yang, 10009.) “Next, Yang teaches that "[t]he labeling apparatus 11 is used to move in the setting range of any one excitation antenna, and base station is excited described in reception 40 low frequency signals sent by the excitation antenna 20." (Yang, 10019.) Yang teaches that "low frequency signal ID (identity) parameter of antenna, is added to positioning signal." (Yang, 10019.) Yang teaches that "the positioning signal is sent to ... base station 12." (Yang, 10019.) Yang teaches that "low frequency signal carries the ID parameters for the excitation antenna for sending the low frequency signal." (Yang, 10019.) “However, Yang fails to teach or suggest "sending, by the target tag, second signaling to the target reader/writer", wherein "the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number", wherein "the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter", and wherein "the identity of the first transmitter is usable by the target reader/writer to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which the target tag is located" as recited by independent claim 1, as amended. “Springer fails to overcome the deficiencies of Yang. Springer teaches that "Reader A generates an RF field. As a result, Tags 1, 2 and 3, which are in the read-zone for Reader A, enter the Ready state." (Springer, 10021.) Springer teaches that "for each of these Tags, the slot counter does not contain any value, no RN16 or handle has been generated yet, the session to be used with Reader A has not been defined yet, and the inventoried flag value is not applicable since the session is undefined." (Springer, 10021.) Springer teaches that "Tags 1, 2 and 3 set their inventoried flag value for session S2 to A." (Springer, 10022.) “Next, Springer teaches that "Reader A issues a Query command, said command comprising a session number Sx, an inventoried flag value IFVX, and a slot-count parameter Q in the range (0, 15)." (Springer, 10023.) Springer teaches that "Tag 1, 2 and 3 enter the Arbitrate state, and generate a Q-bit number and a 16-bit number (RN16) using their random number generator or pseudo-random number generator." (Springer, 10023.) Springer teaches that "the Q-bit number and the RN16 generated by Tag 1 are 1 and 1111; the Q-bit number and the RN16 generated by Tag 2 are 2 and 2222; and the Q-bit number and the RN16 generated by Tag 3 are 3 and 3333." (Springer, 10023.) “Next, Springer teaches that "Reader A issues a QueryRep command, said command comprising the session number of the previous Query command, that is to say S2." (Springer, 10025.) Springer teaches that "Tags 1, 2 and 3, whose slot counters hold nonzero values, decrement their slot counter." (Springer, 10025.) Springer teaches that "since the value in Tag l's slot counter turns zero, Tag 1 transitions to the Reply state." (Springer, 10025.) Springer teaches that "Tag 1 backscatters its RN16, said RN16 being received by Reader A." (Springer, 10026.) “Next, Springer teaches that "all ACK commands issued by a reader and intended for a tag shall include a 16-bit random number previously generated and backscattered by the tag, said number being either the RN16 or the handle." (Springer, 10057.) Springer teaches that "[i]f a reader issues an ACK command to a tag in the Reply or Acknowledged state, then the echoed number shall be the RN16 that the tag previously backscattered as it transitioned from the Arbitrate state to the Reply state." (Springer, 10057.) Springer teaches that "[i]f the reader issues an ACK command to a tag in the Open or Secured state, then the echoed number shall be the tag's handle." (Springer, 10057.) Springer teaches that "the echoed 16-bit random number (either the RN16 or the handle) included in an ACK command is referred to as 'session handle'." (Springer, 10057.) Springer teaches that "'session handle' may refer indifferently to a tag's RN16 or handle." (Springer, 10057.) Springer teaches that "[u]pon receiving an ACK command, a tag shall verify that the session handle is correct prior to executing said command." (Springer, 10057.) “Next, Springer teaches that "[r]eceiving an ACK command with an incorrect session handle may happen in a RFID system having multiple RFID readers operating in parallel, because some tags might be simultaneously within the effective read zone for more than one reader." (Springer, 10058.) Springer teaches that "in the example illustrated in FIG. 1, Tag 3 is in the effective read zone for both Readers A and B." (Springer, 10058.) Springer teaches that "Tag 3 may hear an ACK command issued by Reader B while being in communication with Reader A." (Springer,10058.) Springer teaches that "[s]aid ACK command may for instance be intended for Tag 4." (Springer, 10058.) Springer teaches that "[t]he probability of two readers simultaneously communicating with two tags which have the same session handle being 1 in 216, the session handle included in said ACK command is likely to be different from Tag 3's session handle." (Springer, 10058.) “Next, Springer teaches that "[a] tag hearing an ACK command with an incorrect session handle shall not execute said command." (Springer, 0059.) Springer teaches that "if said tag state is Open or Secured, then the tag shall transition to the Arbitrate state." (Springer, 0059.) Springer teaches that "if Tag 3 is in the Open or the Secured state and hears Reader B sending an ACK command intended to Tag 4, said ACK command comprising Tag 4's session handle, then Tag 3 shall transition to the Arbitrate state, thereby losing connection with Reader A." (Springer, 0059.) “However, Springer also fails to teach or suggest "sending, by the target tag, second signaling to the target reader/writer", wherein "the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number", wherein "the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter", and wherein "the identity of the first transmitter is usable by the target reader/writer to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which the target tag is located" as recited by independent claim 1, as amended. “For at least these reasons, Applicant submits that independent claim 1, as amended, is not taught or suggest by Yang and Springer. “Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the § 103 rejections of independent claim 1,” (from remarks pages 9-12). As to point (A), Examiner respectfully disagrees. Applicant asserts that the combination of Yang and Springer do not teach all the limitations of amended claim 1. The new limitation that has been added in amended claim 1 is “wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number”. This limitation is taught by Springer in [0078], which is later in the reference than the portions of Springer quoted by the Applicant above. See Springer [0078]: “The invention offers a new command, called inventory initiating command, which may be integrated within the Gen2v2 protocol. Preferentially, the inventory initiating command provides similar functionality to the command sequence Select/Query as defined in the Gen2V2 protocol. The inventory initiating command enables the reader to start an inventory round, and instructs the tag to participate in said inventory round. Upon receiving the inventory initiating command, the tag shall generate a first binding handle, as it would have generated a RN16 if it had been in response to a Query, QueryAjust or QueryRep command. However, the first binding handle differs from a classic RN16 in that it is not completely a random number: a portion of the first binding handle is made of the reader identifier included in the inventory initiating command. The identifier for the reader may be a unique value that is different from the values for all other readers, or at least for readers that have some portion of their reading zone in common. Then, the tag shall backscatter the first binding handle, as it would have done with a classic RN16.” (B) Applicant argues, “Independent claim 6 was rejected for reasons similar to those described above with regard to independent claim 1. However, similar to those reasons given above with regard to independent claim 1, as amended, Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest all of the elements in independent claim 6, as amended. For example, Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest at least "receiving, by the target reader/writer, second signaling from the target tag, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter", and "predicting, by the target reader/writer, a location of the target tag based on the identity of the first transmitter and determining a coverage area of the first transmitter using the identity of the first transmitter" as recited in independent claim 6, as amended. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the rejection of independent claim 6. “Claims 7-10 each ultimately depend from independent claim 6. Accordingly, each of the dependent claims are allowable as depending from an allowable base claim, as well as for the additional features that each recites. “Independent claim 11, as amended herein, recites: “a communication interface; “a memory storing computer-readable instructions; and “a processor connected to the memory and the communication interface wherein the processor is configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to perform operations of: “receiving first signaling sent by a target reader/writer, wherein the target reader/writer includes a first transmitter and a first receiver, and the first signaling includes an identity of the first transmitter; and “sending second signaling to the target reader/writer, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter, and wherein the identity of the first transmitter is usable to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which a target tag is located. “Independent claim 11 was rejected for reasons similar to those described above with regard to independent claim 1. However, similar to those reasons given above with regard to independent claim 1, as amended, Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest all of the elements in independent claim 11, as amended. For example, Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest at least "sending second signaling to the target reader/writer", wherein "the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number", wherein "the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter", and wherein "the identity of the first transmitter is usable to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which a target tag is located" as recited in independent claim 11, as amended. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the rejection of independent claim 11. “Claims 12-15 each ultimately depend from independent claim 11. Accordingly, each of the dependent claims are allowable as depending from an allowable base claim, as well as for the additional features that each recites. “Independent claim 16, as amended herein, recites: “a communication interface; “a memory storing computer-readable instructions; and “a processor connected to the memory and the communication interface wherein the processor is configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to perform operations of: “sending first signaling to a target tag, wherein the apparatus includes a first “transmitter and a first receiver, and the first signaling includes an identity of the first transmitter; “receiving second signaling sent by the target tag, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter; and “predicting a location of the target tag based on the identity of the first transmitter and determining a coverage area of the first transmitter using the identity of the first transmitter. “Independent claim 16 was rejected for reasons similar to those described above with regard to independent claim 1. However, similar to those reasons given above with regard to independent claim 1, as amended, Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest all of the elements in independent claim 16, as amended. For example, Yang and Springer, alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest at least "receiving second signaling sent by the target tag, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter", and "predicting a location of the target tag based on the identity of the first transmitter and determining a coverage area of the first transmitter using the identity of the first transmitter" as recited in independent claim 16, as amended. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the rejection of independent claim 16. “Claims 17-20 each ultimately depend from independent claim 16. Accordingly, each of the dependent claims are allowable as depending from an allowable base claim, as well as for the additional features that each recites,” (from remarks pages 13-15). As to point (B), see point (A). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 6 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Yang et al. (CN-10701592-A, cited in the IDS dated 03/27/2025; hereinafter Yang) in view of Springer et al. (US-20180165482-A1, from the same family as CN-108229230-A, which was cited in the IDS dated 10/18/2024. Hereinafter, Springer). Regarding claim 1, Yang discloses: A tag positioning method (see translation at least Abs), comprising: receiving, by a target tag, first signaling from a target reader/writer (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”), wherein the target reader/writer (Examiner maps reader/writer to the ensemble of the excitation base station and the positioning base station) includes a first transmitter (see translation at least [0009]; excitation base station connected to a plurality of excitation antennas) and a first receiver (see translation at least [0011]; positioning base station receives the positioning signal), and the first signaling includes an identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”); and sending, by the target tag, second signaling to the target reader/writer, wherein the second signaling(see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”), and wherein the identity of the first transmitter is usable by the target reader/writer to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which the target tag is located (see translation at least [0024]; “The tag device 11 is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station 40 through the excitation antenna 20, read the ID (identity identification) parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station 12; the above-mentioned low-frequency signal carries the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal, and the above-mentioned ID parameter is set according to the position characteristics of the indoor boundary area where the corresponding excitation antenna is located; the ID parameter is set in a one-to-one correspondence with the excitation antenna, and according to a certain ID parameter, the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal carrying the ID parameter can be determined, thereby determining the position of the indoor boundary area where the above-mentioned excitation antenna is located”). However, Yang does not explicitly teach wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Springer is directed to methods for providing identification and access with respect to an RFID tag. Springer teaches: receiving, by a target tag, first signaling from a target reader/writer (see at least Springer’s example of Gen2V2 protocol, in particular in [0021] – [0023]; “In a step 1, Reader A generates an RF field. As a result, Tags 1, 2 and 3, which are in the read-zone for Reader A, enter the Ready state… In a step 2, Reader A issues a Select command, said command comprising a session number Sx and an inventoried flag value IFVx…In a step 3, Reader A issues a Query command, said command comprising a session number Sx, an inventoried flag value IFVx, and a slot-count parameter Q in the range (0, 15). ”); and sending, by the target tag, second signaling to the target reader/writer, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number (see at least [0078]; “The invention offers a new command, called inventory initiating command, which may be integrated within the Gen2v2 protocol. Preferentially, the inventory initiating command provides similar functionality to the command sequence Select/Query as defined in the Gen2V2 protocol. The inventory initiating command enables the reader to start an inventory round, and instructs the tag to participate in said inventory round. Upon receiving the inventory initiating command, the tag shall generate a first binding handle, as it would have generated a RN16 if it had been in response to a Query, QueryAjust or QueryRep command. However, the first binding handle differs from a classic RN16 in that it is not completely a random number: a portion of the first binding handle is made of the reader identifier included in the inventory initiating command. The identifier for the reader may be a unique value that is different from the values for all other readers, or at least for readers that have some portion of their reading zone in common. Then, the tag shall backscatter the first binding handle, as it would have done with a classic RN16.”) wherein the random number is usable to identify the target reader/writer (see at least [0057] – [0059]; “As already explained, all ACK commands issued by a reader and intended for a tag shall include a 16-bit random number previously generated and backscattered by the tag, said number being either the RN16 or the handle…Receiving an ACK command with an incorrect session handle may happen in a RFID system having multiple RFID readers operating in parallel, because some tags might be simultaneously within the effective read zone for more than one reader, whether this is intentional or not…A tag hearing an ACK command with an incorrect session handle shall not execute said command.”). Yang teaches an RFID tag programmed to include a transmitter identification in replies to signal from the transmitter. Springer teaches an RFID tag assigning a binding handle comprised of a random number and a reader identifier, where the binding handle is used in a session with a reader/writer, and the tag includes the session handle in a reply to the reader/writer, and subsequently executes only commands including that session handle. The reader/writer of Springer transmits and receives from only one location (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time of the claimed invention to modify the tag signaling of Yang to assign a session handle such as taught by Springer for use in messages with the transmitter of the received signal. Doing so would ensure that the tags respond to commands from only one transmitting entity during a session, as taught by Springer (see [0057] – [0059] above, and [0009]; “Tags participate in one and only one session during an inventory round, and two or more readers can use sessions to independently inventory a common tag population.”). Regarding claim 6, Yang discloses: A tag positioning method (see translation at least Abs), comprising: sending, by a target reader/writer, first signaling to a target tag (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”), wherein the target reader/writer (Examiner maps reader/writer to the ensemble of the excitation base station, the positioning base station and the server) includes a first transmitter (see translation at least [0009]; excitation base station connected to a plurality of excitation antennas) and a first receiver (see translation at least [0011]; positioning base station receives the positioning signal), and the first signaling includes an identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”); receiving, by the target reader/writer, second signaling from the target tag, wherein the second signaling (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”); and predicting, by the target reader/writer, a location of the target tag based on the identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0011]; “The positioning base station receives the positioning signal, records the arrival time of the positioning signal, and reports the arrival time and the positioning signal to the server; wherein the positioning signal is used for the server to identify the ID parameter and determine the position of the positioning target based on the ID parameter and the arrival time.”) and determining a coverage area of the first transmitter using the identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0024]; “The tag device 11 is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station 40 through the excitation antenna 20, read the ID (identity identification) parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station 12; the above-mentioned low-frequency signal carries the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal, and the above-mentioned ID parameter is set according to the position characteristics of the indoor boundary area where the corresponding excitation antenna is located; the ID parameter is set in a one-to-one correspondence with the excitation antenna, and according to a certain ID parameter, the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal carrying the ID parameter can be determined, thereby determining the position of the indoor boundary area where the above-mentioned excitation antenna is located”). However, Yang does not explicitly teach wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Springer is directed to methods for providing identification and access with respect to an RFID tag. Springer teaches: sending, by a target reader/writer, first signaling to a target tag (see at least Springer’s example of Gen2V2 protocol, in particular in [0021] – [0023]; “In a step 1, Reader A generates an RF field. As a result, Tags 1, 2 and 3, which are in the read-zone for Reader A, enter the Ready state… In a step 2, Reader A issues a Select command, said command comprising a session number Sx and an inventoried flag value IFVx…In a step 3, Reader A issues a Query command, said command comprising a session number Sx, an inventoried flag value IFVx, and a slot-count parameter Q in the range (0, 15). ”); and receiving, by the target reader/writer, second signaling from the target tag, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number (see at least [0078]; “The invention offers a new command, called inventory initiating command, which may be integrated within the Gen2v2 protocol. Preferentially, the inventory initiating command provides similar functionality to the command sequence Select/Query as defined in the Gen2V2 protocol. The inventory initiating command enables the reader to start an inventory round, and instructs the tag to participate in said inventory round. Upon receiving the inventory initiating command, the tag shall generate a first binding handle, as it would have generated a RN16 if it had been in response to a Query, QueryAjust or QueryRep command. However, the first binding handle differs from a classic RN16 in that it is not completely a random number: a portion of the first binding handle is made of the reader identifier included in the inventory initiating command. The identifier for the reader may be a unique value that is different from the values for all other readers, or at least for readers that have some portion of their reading zone in common. Then, the tag shall backscatter the first binding handle, as it would have done with a classic RN16.”) wherein the random number is usable to identify the reader/writer (see at least [0057] – [0059]; “As already explained, all ACK commands issued by a reader and intended for a tag shall include a 16-bit random number previously generated and backscattered by the tag, said number being either the RN16 or the handle…Receiving an ACK command with an incorrect session handle may happen in a RFID system having multiple RFID readers operating in parallel, because some tags might be simultaneously within the effective read zone for more than one reader, whether this is intentional or not…A tag hearing an ACK command with an incorrect session handle shall not execute said command.”). Yang teaches an RFID tag programmed to include a transmitter identification in replies to signal from the transmitter. Springer teaches an RFID tag assigning a binding handle comprised of a random number and a reader identifier, where the binding handle is used in a session with a reader/writer, and the tag includes the session handle in a reply to the reader/writer, and subsequently executes only commands including that session handle. The reader/writer of Springer transmits and receives from only one location (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time of the claimed invention to modify the tag signaling of Yang to assign a session handle such as taught by Springer for use in messages with the transmitter of the received signal. Doing so would ensure that the tags respond to commands from only one transmitting entity during a session, as taught by Springer (see [0057] – [0059] above, and [0009]; “Tags participate in one and only one session during an inventory round, and two or more readers can use sessions to independently inventory a common tag population.”). Regarding claim 9, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 6. Yang further teaches: wherein the target reader/writer includes a third transmitter, and the method further comprises: obtaining, by the target reader/writer, first configuration information through the first receiver, wherein the first configuration information indicates a location of the third transmitter or a deployment relationship between a plurality of third transmitters (see translation at least [0037]; “Since the tag device 11 moves with the positioning target, during the positioning process of the positioning target, the emission area of the current positioning signal and the emission area of the previous positioning signal may be adjacent areas. If the current boundary area and the previous boundary area are adjacent areas, it indicates that the current boundary area identified by the server 31 is a reasonable identification result.” Multiple excitation antennas are taught in [0008] and are mapped to the transmitters of the claim. Signals backscattered by the tag are taught to be received by the base station in [0010], and the base station is mapped to the first receiver of the claim.). Claims 2-4, 7-8, 11-14 and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang in view of Springer, further in view of Enyedy et al. (US-20080197979-A1; hereinafter Enyedy). Regarding claim 2, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 1. However, Yang does not explicitly teach: wherein the receiving the first signaling includes receiving inventory signaling, and the inventory signaling includes selection signaling Select, query signaling Query, acknowledgment signaling ACK, negative acknowledgment signaling NAK, and/or query signaling Queryrep. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Enyedy is directed to causing RFID tags to reply using changed reply timing. Enyedy teaches: wherein the receiving the first signaling includes receiving inventory signaling, and the inventory signaling includes selection signaling Select (see at least Fig. 8, commands 860, 870 and 880 transmitted to the tag. See also [0117]; “Each one of commands 860, 870, 880 can thus be constructed as an implementation of this Select command or the BlockWrite command.”), query signaling Query, acknowledgment signaling ACK, negative acknowledgment signaling NAK, and/or query signaling Queryrep. Both Yang and Enyedy teach system that transmit to and receive replies from tags. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the indoor positioning system used in Yang to include Select commands, as taught by Enyedy. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to include Select commands in order to send commands to the tags, as taught by Enyedy (see Enyedy at least [0118]; “In addition, the implementation of this Select command can have a custom payload so that it operates as Enable command 860, custom timing command 870, Disable command 880, and/or another custom command.”). Regarding claim 3, Yang in view of Springer Enyedy discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 2. However, Yang does not explicitly teach: wherein the sending the second signaling includes sending the inventory signaling, and the inventory signaling includes reply signaling Reply or an electronic product code EPC. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Enyedy is directed to causing RFID tags to reply using changed reply timing. Enyedy teaches: wherein the sending the second signaling includes sending the inventory signaling, and the inventory signaling includes reply signaling Reply (see at least [0098]; “In one class of examples, the first command can be any of the commands issued in an exchange for commissioning a tag, where data is written in its memory, and an acknowledging reply is backscattered. It is known, therefore, that a tag that has been commissioned has received such a first command, and has replied to it.”) or an electronic product code EPC. Both Yang and Enyedy teach system that transmit to and receive replies from tags. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the indoor positioning system used in Yang to include Reply commands, as taught by Enyedy. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to include Reply commands in order to have confirmation that the tag has been commissioned, as taught by Enyedy (see Enyedy at least [0098]). Regarding claim 4, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 1. However, Yang does not explicitly teach: wherein receiving the first signaling includes receiving a reporting time of the identity of the first transmitter. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Enyedy is directed to causing RFID tags to reply using changed reply timing. Enyedy teaches: wherein receiving the first signaling includes receiving a reporting time (see at least [0102]; “At operation 770, a custom timing command is caused to be transmitted to the tag, after receiving the first reply. In response to receiving the custom timing command, when the tag later backscatters a second reply, that second reply uses a second reply timing that is different from the first reply timing.”). Both Yang and Enyedy teach system that transmit to and receive replies from tags. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the indoor positioning system used in Yang to include control of the timing of the responses from tags, as taught by Enyedy. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to include control over timing of the reply in order to process some tags differentially from others, as recognized by Enyedy (see Enyedy at least [0014]; “The invention offers the advantage that some tags can be processed differentially from others, which can improve the functionality of a whole RFID system that processes RFID-tagged items.”). Regarding claim 7, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 6. The remaining limitations of claim 7 are analogous to those of claim 2 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 8, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 7. The remaining limitations of claim 8 are analogous to those of claim 3 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 11, Yang discloses: An apparatus (see translation at least [0008]; “tag device”), comprising: a communication interface (see translation at least [0010], where tag capabilities to receive excitation signals and send positioning signals are described), receiving first signaling sent by a target reader/writer (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”), wherein the target reader/writer (Examiner maps reader/writer to the ensemble of the excitation base station and the positioning base station) includes a first transmitter (see translation at least [0009]; excitation base station connected to a plurality of excitation antennas) and a first receiver (see translation at least [0011]; positioning base station receives the positioning signal), and the first signaling includes an identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”); and sending second signaling to the target reader/writer, wherein the second signaling (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”) and wherein the identity of the first transmitter is usable to determine a coverage area of the first transmitter and in which the target tag is located (see translation at least [0024]; “The tag device 11 is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station 40 through the excitation antenna 20, read the ID (identity identification) parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station 12; the above-mentioned low-frequency signal carries the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal, and the above-mentioned ID parameter is set according to the position characteristics of the indoor boundary area where the corresponding excitation antenna is located; the ID parameter is set in a one-to-one correspondence with the excitation antenna, and according to a certain ID parameter, the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal carrying the ID parameter can be determined, thereby determining the position of the indoor boundary area where the above-mentioned excitation antenna is located”). However, Yang does not explicitly teach wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter or the device having a memory and a processor. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Springer is directed to methods for providing identification and access with respect to an RFID tag. Springer teaches: receiving first signaling sent by a target reader/writer (see at least Springer’s example of Gen2V2 protocol, in particular in [0021] – [0023]; “In a step 1, Reader A generates an RF field. As a result, Tags 1, 2 and 3, which are in the read-zone for Reader A, enter the Ready state… In a step 2, Reader A issues a Select command, said command comprising a session number Sx and an inventoried flag value IFVx…In a step 3, Reader A issues a Query command, said command comprising a session number Sx, an inventoried flag value IFVx, and a slot-count parameter Q in the range (0, 15). ”); and sending second signaling to the target reader/writer, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number (see at least [0078]; “The invention offers a new command, called inventory initiating command, which may be integrated within the Gen2v2 protocol. Preferentially, the inventory initiating command provides similar functionality to the command sequence Select/Query as defined in the Gen2V2 protocol. The inventory initiating command enables the reader to start an inventory round, and instructs the tag to participate in said inventory round. Upon receiving the inventory initiating command, the tag shall generate a first binding handle, as it would have generated a RN16 if it had been in response to a Query, QueryAjust or QueryRep command. However, the first binding handle differs from a classic RN16 in that it is not completely a random number: a portion of the first binding handle is made of the reader identifier included in the inventory initiating command. The identifier for the reader may be a unique value that is different from the values for all other readers, or at least for readers that have some portion of their reading zone in common. Then, the tag shall backscatter the first binding handle, as it would have done with a classic RN16.”) wherein the random number is usable to identify the target reader/writer (see at least [0057] – [0059]; “As already explained, all ACK commands issued by a reader and intended for a tag shall include a 16-bit random number previously generated and backscattered by the tag, said number being either the RN16 or the handle…Receiving an ACK command with an incorrect session handle may happen in a RFID system having multiple RFID readers operating in parallel, because some tags might be simultaneously within the effective read zone for more than one reader, whether this is intentional or not…A tag hearing an ACK command with an incorrect session handle shall not execute said command.”). Yang teaches an RFID tag programmed to include a transmitter identification in replies to signal from the transmitter. Springer teaches an RFID tag assigning a binding handle comprised of a random number and a reader identifier, where the binding handle is used in a session with a reader/writer, and the tag includes the session handle in a reply to the reader/writer, and subsequently executes only commands including that session handle. The reader/writer of Springer transmits and receives from only one location (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time of the claimed invention to modify the tag signaling of Yang to assign a session handle such as taught by Springer for use in messages with the transmitter of the received signal. Doing so would ensure that the tags respond to commands from only one transmitting entity during a session, as taught by Springer (see [0057] – [0059] above, and [0009]; “Tags participate in one and only one session during an inventory round, and two or more readers can use sessions to independently inventory a common tag population.”). However, Yang and Springer do not explicitly teach the device having a memory and a processor. Enyedy teaches: An apparatus (see at least Fig. 2, RFID tag 220), comprising (see at least [0130]; “FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an electrical circuit 1024 according to embodiments. Circuit 1024 may be formed in an IC of an RFID tag, such as IC 224 of FIG. 2.”): a memory storing computer-readable instructions (see at least [0137]; “Processing block 1044 may be implemented in any way known in the art. For example, processing block 1044 may include a number of components, such as a processor, memory, a decoder, an encoder, and so on.”); and a processor (see at least [0137]; “processor”) connected to the memory and the communication interface wherein the processor is configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to perform operations (see at least [0136]; “Circuit 1024 further includes a processing block 1044. Processing block 1044 receives the demodulated signal from demodulator 1042, and may perform operations. In addition, it may generate an output signal for transmission.”). Both Yang and Enyedy teach tags that perform communication operations. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use a memory and processor, as taught by Enyedy, in the tags of Yang. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to include a memory and processor in order to perform operations, as taught by Enyedy (see Enyedy at least [0136]). Regarding claim 12, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 11. The remaining limitations of claim 12 are analogous to those of claim 2 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 13, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 11. The remaining limitations of claim 13 are analogous to those of claim 3 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 14, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 11. The remaining limitations of claim 14 are analogous to those of claim 4 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 16, Yang discloses: An apparatus (see translation at least [0008]; “a positioning base station, an excitation base station and multiple excitation antennas”), comprising: a communication interface (see translation at least [0010] – [0011], where communication functions such as sending and receiving signals are described); sending first signaling to a target tag (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”), wherein the target reader/writer (Examiner maps reader/writer to the ensemble of the excitation base station, the positioning base station and the server) includes a first transmitter (see translation at least [0009]; excitation base station connected to a plurality of excitation antennas) and a first receiver (see translation at least [0011]; positioning base station receives the positioning signal), and the first signaling includes an identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”); receiving second signaling sent by the target tag, wherein the second signaling (see translation at least [0010]; “The tag device is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station through the excitation antenna, read the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station”); and predicting a location of the target tag based on the identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0011]; “The positioning base station receives the positioning signal, records the arrival time of the positioning signal, and reports the arrival time and the positioning signal to the server; wherein the positioning signal is used for the server to identify the ID parameter and determine the position of the positioning target based on the ID parameter and the arrival time.”) and determining a coverage area of the first transmitter using the identity of the first transmitter (see translation at least [0024]; “The tag device 11 is used to move within the set range of any excitation antenna, receive the low-frequency signal sent by the excitation base station 40 through the excitation antenna 20, read the ID (identity identification) parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal from the received low-frequency signal, add the ID parameter to the positioning signal, and send the positioning signal to the positioning base station 12; the above-mentioned low-frequency signal carries the ID parameter of the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal, and the above-mentioned ID parameter is set according to the position characteristics of the indoor boundary area where the corresponding excitation antenna is located; the ID parameter is set in a one-to-one correspondence with the excitation antenna, and according to a certain ID parameter, the excitation antenna that sends the low-frequency signal carrying the ID parameter can be determined, thereby determining the position of the indoor boundary area where the above-mentioned excitation antenna is located”). However, Yang does not explicitly teach wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number, wherein the random number is usable to identify the first transmitter or the device having a memory and a processor. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Springer is directed to methods for providing identification and access with respect to an RFID tag. Springer teaches: sending first signaling to a target tag (see at least Springer’s example of Gen2V2 protocol, in particular in [0021] – [0023]; “In a step 1, Reader A generates an RF field. As a result, Tags 1, 2 and 3, which are in the read-zone for Reader A, enter the Ready state… In a step 2, Reader A issues a Select command, said command comprising a session number Sx and an inventoried flag value IFVx…In a step 3, Reader A issues a Query command, said command comprising a session number Sx, an inventoried flag value IFVx, and a slot-count parameter Q in the range (0, 15). ”); and receiving second signaling sent by the target tag, wherein the second signaling is encrypted by adding the identity of the first transmitter to a random number (see at least [0078]; “The invention offers a new command, called inventory initiating command, which may be integrated within the Gen2v2 protocol. Preferentially, the inventory initiating command provides similar functionality to the command sequence Select/Query as defined in the Gen2V2 protocol. The inventory initiating command enables the reader to start an inventory round, and instructs the tag to participate in said inventory round. Upon receiving the inventory initiating command, the tag shall generate a first binding handle, as it would have generated a RN16 if it had been in response to a Query, QueryAjust or QueryRep command. However, the first binding handle differs from a classic RN16 in that it is not completely a random number: a portion of the first binding handle is made of the reader identifier included in the inventory initiating command. The identifier for the reader may be a unique value that is different from the values for all other readers, or at least for readers that have some portion of their reading zone in common. Then, the tag shall backscatter the first binding handle, as it would have done with a classic RN16.”) wherein the random number is usable to identify the transmitter (see at least [0057] – [0059]; “As already explained, all ACK commands issued by a reader and intended for a tag shall include a 16-bit random number previously generated and backscattered by the tag, said number being either the RN16 or the handle…Receiving an ACK command with an incorrect session handle may happen in a RFID system having multiple RFID readers operating in parallel, because some tags might be simultaneously within the effective read zone for more than one reader, whether this is intentional or not…A tag hearing an ACK command with an incorrect session handle shall not execute said command.”). Yang teaches an RFID tag programmed to include a transmitter identification in replies to signal from the transmitter. Springer teaches an RFID tag assigning a binding handle comprised of a random number and a reader identifier, where the binding handle is used in a session with a reader/writer, and the tag includes the session handle in a reply to the reader/writer, and subsequently executes only commands including that session handle. The reader/writer of Springer transmits and receives from only one location (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time of the claimed invention to modify the tag signaling of Yang to assign a session handle such as taught by Springer for use in messages with the transmitter of the received signal. Doing so would ensure that the tags respond to commands from only one transmitting entity during a session, as taught by Springer (see [0057] – [0059] above, and [0009]; “Tags participate in one and only one session during an inventory round, and two or more readers can use sessions to independently inventory a common tag population.”). However, Yang and Springer do not explicitly teach the device having a memory and a processor. Enyedy teaches: An apparatus (see at least Fig. 1, reader 110; see also Fig. 5, local block 510 and [0058]; “It will be recognized that reader 110 of FIG. 1 is the same as local block 510, if remote components 570 are not provided.”), comprising: a communication interface (see at least Fig. 5, communication to and from tags); a memory storing computer-readable instructions (see at least [0061]; “Local block 510 additionally includes an optional local memory 557. Memory 557 may be implemented in any number of ways known in the art. Such ways include, by way of examples and not of limitation, nonvolatile memories (NVM), read-only memories (ROM), random access memories (RAM), any combination of one or more of these, and so on.”); and a processor connected to the memory and the communication interface wherein the processor is configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to perform operations (see at least [0061]; “Memory 557, if provided, can include programs for processor 556 to run, if provided.”). Both Yang and Enyedy teach apparatuses that interface with tags to perform communication operations. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use a memory and processor, as taught by Enyedy, in the apparatus of Yang. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to include a memory and processor in order to be able to run programs, as taught by Enyedy (see Enyedy at least [0061]). Regarding claim 17, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 16. The remaining limitations of claim 17 are analogous to those of claim 2 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 18, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 17. The remaining limitations of claim 18 are analogous to those of claim 3 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 19, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 16. The remaining limitations of claim 19 are analogous to those of claim 9 and are rejected for similar reasons. Claims 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang in view of Springer, further in view of Peterson et al. (US-20170059501-A1; hereinafter Peterson). Regarding claim 5, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 1. However, Yang does not explicitly teach: wherein the receiving the first signaling includes receiving a quantity of reporting times of the identity of the first transmitter. Yang teaches an indoor positioning system using tag devices, and Peterson is directed to monitoring hazardous waste using reporting from active RFID tags. Peterson teaches: wherein the receiving the first signaling includes receiving a quantity of reporting times (see at least [0056]; “Computing device 606 using information received from gateway receiver 602 also may identify which drum 104 is having a problem due to the unique identification code provided by RFID circuit 206 within sensor device 100. Computing device 606 also may issue commands to drums 104 to provide additional information or to change their reporting periods. For example, if a problem is detected, computing device may command that sensor devices report every 30 seconds instead of every 5 minutes. Thus, if the condition disappears in a certain amount of time, then a false alarm may be reported.”). Both Yang and Peterson provide monitoring enabled by tag devices. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the indoor positioning system used in Yang to include controlling the frequency of reporting of the tags, as taught by Peterson. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to control the frequency of the responses in order to monitor some tags more or less closely, as taught by Peterson (see Peterson at least [0056]). Regarding claim 10, Yang in view of Springer discloses the tag positioning method according to claim 6. However, Yang does not explicitly teach: wherein the method further comprises: sending, by the target reader/writer, second configuration information to the transmitter through the receiver, wherein the second configuration information indicates a configuration required for communication between the target tag and the target reader/writer. Peterson teaches: wherein the method further comprises: sending, by the target reader/writer, second configuration information via the instructions after having been received through the receiver, wherein the second configuration information indicates a configuration required for communication between the target tag and the target reader/writer (see at least [0056] – [0057]; “Computing device 606 using information received from gateway receiver 602 also may identify which drum 104 is having a problem due to the unique identification code provided by RFID circuit 206 within sensor device 100. Computing device 606 also may issue commands to drums 104 to provide additional information or to change their reporting periods. For example, if a problem is detected, computing device may command that sensor devices report every 30 seconds instead of every 5 minutes… Using the unique code for each RFID circuit 206, computing device 606 may issue commands and instructions using gateway receiver 602 using encrypted signals.” Examiner notes that the identification code is read by the receiver, then the computing device includes the identification code in transmitted instructions in order to communicate with the target tag.). Both Yang and Peterson provide monitoring enabled by tag devices. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to act on information reported by a specific tag by later transmitting instructions to that specific tag by using the unique identification code, as taught by Peterson. One of ordinary skill would be motivated to communicate with a single tag in order to gain additional information from a specific tag, as taught by Peterson (see Peterson at least [0056]). Claims 15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang in view of Springer, Enyedy and Peterson. Regarding claim 15, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 11. The remaining limitations of claim 15 are analogous to those of claim 5 and are rejected for similar reasons. Regarding claim 20, Yang in view of Springer and Enyedy teaches the apparatus according to claim 16. The remaining limitations of claim 20 are analogous to those of claim 10 and are rejected for similar reasons. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ashley B. Raynal whose telephone number is (703)756-4546. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vladimir Magloire can be reached at (571) 270-5144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY BROWN RAYNAL/Examiner, Art Unit 3648 /OLUMIDE AJIBADE AKONAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 12, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704466
SENSOR DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12674698
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12651844
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING EMI ABSORBER
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12651834
QUASI-N-BIT-QUANTIZED RECONFIGURABLE METASURFACE ANTENNA
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644698
THZ MEASUREMENT METHOD AND THZ MEASUREMENT DEVICE FOR SURVEYING A MEASUREMENT OBJECT, IN PARTICULAR A PIPE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.5%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 47 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month