Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/358,739

PRINTING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Examiner
AMEH, YAOVI M
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
825 granted / 905 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
933
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 905 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/22/2025 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement 3. Acknowledgment is made of Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) form PTO-1449. These IDS have been considered. Priority 4. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Drawings 5. The examiner contends that the drawings submitted on 07/25/2023 are acceptable for examination proceedings. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 6. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 7. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 8. Claims 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Kawamoto (US Pub. Nº 2015/0109396). 9. Regarding independent claim 7: Kawamoto disclosed a printing apparatus ([0040], line 1; also see Fig. 6, reference 11) comprising: a rolled paper holder ([0070], line 1; also see Fig. 6, reference 16) configured to accommodate rolled paper ([0070], line 1; also see Fig. 6, reference R); a feeding roller that feeds recording paper drawn from the rolled paper accommodated in the rolled paper holder ([0064], lines 1-3; also see Fig. 6, the series of roller pairs disposed in a straight line upstream and downstream of the recording unit 31) toward an outlet ([0064], line 2; also see Fig. 6, reference 14); and a recess that extends in a second direction intersecting a first direction from the feeding roller toward the outlet and provided between the feeding roller and the outlet (see the annotated Fig. 6 below for the recess), wherein a dimension of the recess in a third direction that is a depth direction of the recess is larger than an opening width of the recess in the first direction (see the annotated exploded view of Fig. 6 below; the depth of the recess (vertical direction) is larger than the opening width in the first direction (horizontal direction). Note that in Fig. 6 the printer is not disposed with the right side up, which prevents the medium CP from exiting), and the recess is above both the feeding roller and the outlet in the third direction (the annotated exploded view of Fig. 6 below shows the recess disposed above both the feeding roller and the outlet in the third direction). [AltContent: textbox (Third inner surface)][AltContent: textbox (Feeding rollers)][AltContent: textbox (Recess)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (First inner surface)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (Edge inner surface)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Outlet)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 246 876 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (Exploded view of Fig. 6)] 10. Regarding claim 8: Kawamoto disclosed the printing apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the recess includes a third inner surface positioned in the third direction of the recess (see the annotated exploded view of Fig. 6 above for the third inner surface), a first inner surface that is continuous with the third inner surface and that is positioned in the first direction of the recess (see the annotated exploded view of Fig. 6 above for the first inner surface), and an edge inner surface that is continuous with the first inner surface and that is positioned at an opening edge of the recess (see the annotated exploded view of Fig. 6 above for the edge inner surface), and the edge inner surface is inclined with respect to the first direction such that a front-side edge inner surface end that is an end of the edge inner surface in a fourth direction opposite to the third direction is positioned further in the first direction than a rear-side edge inner surface end that is an end of the edge inner surface in the third direction (see the annotated exploded view of Fig. 6 above). Allowable Subject Matter 11. Claims 1 and 5-6 are allowed. Conclusion 12. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 13. Japanese Patent application publication number 2019-204144 to Oikawa et al. also disclosed a similar invention in Fig. 5. 14. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAOVI M. AMEH whose telephone number is (571)272-4578. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM. 15. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. 16. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RICARDO MAGALLANES can be reached at (571)272-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 17. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAOVI M AMEH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jun 16, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584271
REACTIVE DIGITAL PRINTING METHODS AND SYSTEMS, PRINTED FABRIC OBTAINED THEREBY AND RELATED CLOTHING ITEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583239
RECORDING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583233
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577422
INKJET INK SET, INKJET RECORDING APPARATUS, AND INKJET RECORDING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570086
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRINTING A TACTILE TEXTURED SURFACE ON A SURFACE OF A COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.4%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 905 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month