Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/359,883

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACK AND TRACE USER AND ENTITY BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Examiner
HUANG, KAYLEE J
Art Unit
2447
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qomplx LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
262 granted / 349 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +51% interview lift
Without
With
+51.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
381
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 349 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant amended claims 1, 7, 9, 15, 18, and 20 in the Request for Continued Examination filed on 02/19/2026. Claims 1-20 remain pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/19/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that with respect to claims 17 and 19, support for “the user comprises an automated process” can be found at least in paragraphs [181] and [198] of the specification. In response to applicant’s argument, the cited paragraph [181] of the specification discloses “the results of the analysis of such data may be used to enrich a dataset of track and trace data which can be used to create one or more graph representations of a network and its users and processes”. The paragraph [181] simply discloses users and processes, the paragraph does not disclose “the user comprises an automated process”. The paragraph [198] discloses “other network-related activities initiated by a user/application/process”, the paragraph does not disclose “the user comprises an automated process”. Applicant argued that with respect to claims 18 and 20, support for “the record of events includes device-specific events or task specific events” can be found at least in paragraph [198] of the specification. In response to applicant’s argument, the cited paragraph [198] of the specification discloses “This may result in a trace and track dataset comprising various user-level trace information including, but not limited to: tagged network packets or events generated by an application during its execution (e.g., source/destination IP addresses, port numbers, protocols used, packet timestamps, and payload data); data related to application interactions with a network such as communication flows, requests and responses, and other network-related activities initiated by a user/application/process; protocol analysis information; and performance of network interactions from an application perspective”. The cited paragraph discloses trace and track dataset comprising various user-level trace information, such as events generated by an application and data related to application interactions with a network. The cited paragraph does not disclose “the record of events includes device-specific events or task specific events”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. For claims 17 and 19, the examiner is unable to find support for “the user comprises an automated process” in the specification. For claims 18 and 20, the examiner is unable to find support for “the record of events includes device-specific events or task specific events” in the specification. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Scheib et al. (US 11,637,762 B2). Creates a visual representation of the application dependency graph via the user interface. Madani et al. (US 2016/0359678 A1). Generate an application dependency map, which depicts the physical and logical dependencies of the application components, as well as the dependencies of the components on the underlying infrastructure resources. Chari et al. (US 2017/0308712 A1). Generate a data flow graph and a control flow graph for the application based on the input and output sensitive data flow points for the components of the application. Raanan (US 7,590,715 B1). A packet is captured by sampling traffic on a network; the information extracted from the packet is used to dynamically generate a dependency map of applications, components, services, and business processes. Merten et al. (US 2023/0315470 A1). Captures trace data generated as a result of processor executing software instructions on hardware threads of the core while tracing is enabled; the tracer also formats the trace data into individual trace data packets for routing as a packet stream ([0046]). Partridge (US 2006/0165003 A1). Generating a graph representative of the route through the network taken by the data packet of interest. Pauw et al. (US 2004/0015879 A1). Insert debugging code into specific portion ([0004]). Hawe et al. (US 5,594,869). Analyzing each incoming packet to identify packets of the particular protocol type requiring decryption. Ree et al. (US 2003/0182440 A1). Analyzing the packet protocols to determine the protocols being used, protocol checksum values, and which socket the packet is going to ([0074]). Pierson (US 2003/0048781 A1). Determine what protocol that data packet is in; inserting data packet framing bit(s) as determined by the particular transmission protocol being used. Chang et al. (US 2013/0152050 A1). Storing the crash data on the end user device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAYLEE J HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-0080. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joon H Hwang can be reached on 571-272-4036. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Kaylee Huang 03/21/2025 /KAYLEE J HUANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2447
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 04, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Feb 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603902
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM APPLIED TO CAN COMMUNICATION USING DETECTION POLICY RULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12568038
DYNAMIC ANYCAST CLIENT ROUTING AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562933
Limited Communications Threads Associated with Construction Based Data Objects
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556574
USING CROSS WORKLOADS SIGNALS TO REMEDIATE PASSWORD SPRAYING ATTACKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12554878
PHONE NUMBER OBFUSCATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+51.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 349 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month