Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/360,102

RESIN PARTICLE, TONER, DEVELOPING AGENT, TONER ACCOMMODATING UNIT, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Priority
Jul 29, 2022 — JP 2022-121879 +1 more
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
25 granted / 32 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.7%
+49.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 32 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see the Response, filed 3/24/2026, with respect to the rejections of claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration of the amendments, a new ground(s) of rejection is made below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-3, and 5-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saitoh (US PGP 2016-0187795) in view of Kanno (US PGP 2021-0181649). Saitoh teaches a toner comprising a polyester resin and a crystalline polyester resin ([0015]). The exemplary toners contain an amorphous polyester resin, a prepolymer, and a crystalline polyester resin ([0266-278]). The amorphous polyester resins contain a monomer having a carboxyl group, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, and adipic acid (Table 1-1). Similarly to the prepolymer 1 of the instant application, the amorphous polyester resin pA1 contains terephthalic acid, adipic acid, and 3-methyl-1,5-pentanediol as the monomer units for the intermediate product ([0268]). This product is then reacted with isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) to form the prepolymer ([0269]). The amount of the prepolymer used in the exemplary toners is from 7.6% to 14% (Table 3). The toner may be used with a carrier to form a developer ([0242]). Saitoh teaches an image forming apparatus and image forming method according to claims 9-11 ([0245-263]). Saitoh is silent regarding a polyvalent metal ion. Kanno teaches a toner containing a multivalent metal element selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Al, Fe, and Zn (Abstract). The multivalent metal element can form crosslinks that contribute to the toner fixing performance ([0131]). When the metal ion forms crosslinks with the monomer, the low-temperature fixability and hot offset resistance of the toner is improved ([0135]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Saitoh to have included the multivalent metal element of Kanno in order to improve the fixing performance of the toner. The modified toner of Saitoh and Kanno has the same three resin components, the amorphous polyester, the polyester prepolymer, and the crystalline polyester, as the instant application. The production method of emulsification aggregation, with an addition of a metal salt to aggregate and crosslink the particles is also the same. The toner would therefore be expected to have similar viscoelastic properties as the instant application and fulfill the loss tangent and storage elastic modulus limitations of claims 1-3. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 06/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12645164
TONER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631982
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 32 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month