Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/361,524

GRABBING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 28, 2023
Examiner
MCCONNELL, AARON R
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Infection Control Products LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
85 granted / 191 resolved
-25.5% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+54.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
224
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 191 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Medicine Status of Claims This action is in reply to the communications filed on 7/28/2023. The Examiner notes claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. And/or (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-11, & 14-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tacoma (US 20090159487), hereinafter Tacoma. Regarding claim 1. (Each claim status is listed above in the Status of Claims section) Tacoma discloses a grabbing device [10] comprising: a grabbing claw [26] configured to expand from a collapsed state [Fig 1] to an expanded state [Fig 2], wherein the grabbing claw is attached at one end to a wire [Fig 6 & 12-13; 22]; and a switch [24] in mechanical connection with the wire [Fig 6 & 11], wherein the switch is configured to move the grabbing claw from a first position to a second position [¶37]; wherein when the switch is in the first position, the grabbing claw is in the collapsed state [Fig 1 & 12; ¶37], and wherein when the switch is in the second position, the grabbing claw is in the expanded state [Fig 1 & 13; ¶37]. Regarding claim 2.Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 1, wherein when the grabbing claw is in the expanded state, the grabbing claw is configured to hold a cleaning product [Fig 14 & 20; ¶44; 26 can hold a wipe, wash cloth, or sponge which are cleaning products and the figures show 26 holding cleaning products]. Regarding claim 3. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 2, further comprising: a first stop portion projecting inwardly from the grabbing device; and a second stop portion projecting inwardly from the grabbing device; wherein when the switch abuts the first stop portion, the switch is in the first position, and wherein when the switch abuts the second stop portion, the switch is in the second position [Fig 6 & 11; 24 extends through a hole in 21; this hole has a stop at first end of the hole away from the claw and another stop at a second end of the hole closest to the claw; the switch abuts these in its first and second positions, respectively; additionally the stops project from an outer surface of the stop inwardly towards the center of the elongated member that houses the wire]. Regarding claim 6. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 1, further comprising a spring connected to the switch at a rear end of the grabbing device [¶38; the grabbing device can have a spring connected to 24 (via 26B) which is located at a rear end of the grabbing device, per ¶9 the button is located at a second end of the grabbing device opposite the first end which has the claws (i.e. the button is locate at a rear end)]. Regarding claim 7. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 1, wherein when the grabbing claw is in the collapsed state, the grabbing claw is contained within the grabbing device [Fig 1 & 6]. Regarding claim 8. A grabbing device comprising: a grabbing claw configured to hold a cleaning wipe; and a switch configured to move the grabbing claw from a first position to a second position; wherein when the switch is in the first position, the grabbing claw is in a collapsed and retracted state, and wherein when the switch is in the second position, the grabbing claw is in an expanded and protruded state [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 1-2]. Regarding claim 9. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 8, wherein the grabbing claw and the switch are connected via a wire. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 1] Regarding claim 10. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 8, wherein when the grabbing claw is in the expanded and protruded state, the grabbing claw is configured to hold a cleaning product [Fig 1-2 & 14]. Regarding claim 11. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 9, further comprising: a first stop portion projecting inwardly from the grabbing device; and a second stop portion projecting inwardly from the grabbing device; wherein when the switch abuts the first stop portion, the switch is in the first position, and wherein when the switch abuts the second stop portion, the switch is in the second position. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 3] Regarding claim 14. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 8, further comprising a spring connected to the switch at a rear end of the grabbing device. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 6] Regarding claim 15. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 8, wherein when the grabbing claw is in the collapsed and retracted state, the grabbing claw is contained within the grabbing device. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 7] Regarding claim 16. Tacoma discloses a method for using a grabbing device comprising: moving a switch from a first position to a second position such that a grabbing claw may protrude from the grabbing device such that a cleaning wipe may be placed into the grabbing claw; and moving the switch from the second position to the first position, causing the grabbing claw to retract into the grabbing device [Fig 1-2 & 14; ¶10 & ¶37; the grabbing device operates by moving the switch (24) from a first position [Fig 1] to a second position [Fig 2] with the claws (26) protruding which can grab a cleaning wipe then retracting the claws by moving the switch back to the first position]. Regarding claim 17. Tacoma discloses the method of claim 16, further comprising the step of moving the switch from the first position to the second position, causing the grabbing claw to protrude from the grabbing device [Fig 1-2]. Regarding claim 18. Tacoma discloses the method of claim 16, wherein the grabbing device comprises: a first stop portion projecting inwardly from the grabbing device; and a second stop portion projecting inwardly from the grabbing device; wherein when the switch abuts the first stop portion, the switch is in the first position, and wherein when the switch abuts the second stop portion, the switch is in the second position. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 3] Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-5, 12-13, & 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tacoma in view of Federico et al. (US 5630243), hereinafter Federico. Regarding claim 4. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 1, wherein the switch further comprises an internal body that translates with the switch inside the grabbing device [Fig 11; 24 has an internal body within 21 that translates with outer portion of 24 inside of the grabbing device], and wherein the wire further comprises a wire attachment … in the internal body of the switch [Fig 11; ¶37; 22 is attached to the internal body of 24]. Tacoma may not explicitly disclose a wire attachment looped through a pin hole in the internal body of the switch. Federico teaches a grabbing device with a wire attachment looped through a pin hole in the internal body of the switch [Fig 1A; the wire (4) has a wire attachment to 2 through a pin hole in the internal body of 2]. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the wire attachment as disclosed by Tacoma to have a wire attachment looped through a pin hole in the internal body of the switch as taught by Federico for the purpose of disclosing a known attachment structure connecting the wire and switch as Tacoma discloses that they are not integral but does not disclose the specific structure [Tacoma: ¶37 & Federico: Fig 1A]. Regarding claim 5. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 4, further comprising a rigid rod [Fig 6 & 12-13; 26A is ridge rod as it is thicker and therefore more ridge than the rest of 22], wherein the wire attachment mechanically connects the internal body to the rigid rod [Fig 6 & 11-13; 22 connects 24 to 26A]. Regarding claim 12. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 9, wherein the switch further comprises an internal body that translates with the switch inside the grabbing device, and wherein the wire further comprises a wire attachment looped through a pin hole in the internal body of the switch. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 4] Regarding claim 13. Tacoma discloses the grabbing device of claim 12, further comprising a rigid rod, wherein the wire attachment mechanically connects the internal body to the rigid rod. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 5] Regarding claim 19. Tacoma discloses the method of claim 16, wherein the switch further comprises an internal body that translates with the switch inside the grabbing device, and wherein a wire that connects the switch to the grabbing claw further comprises a wire attachment looped through a pin hole in the internal body of the switch. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 4] Regarding claim 20. Tacoma discloses the method of claim 19, further comprising a rigid rod, wherein the wire attachment mechanically connects the internal body to the rigid rod. [Rejected for the same reason(s) as the similar limitation(s) in claim 5] Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See Notice of References Cited, PTO form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON R MCCONNELL whose telephone number is (303)297-4608. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 0700-1600 MST [0900-1800 EST] 2nd Friday 0700-1500 MST [0900-1700 EST]. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Keller can be reached at (571) 272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON R MCCONNELL/Examiner, Art Unit 3723 /LAURA C GUIDOTTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 28, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12543846
HAIRBRUSH
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12496202
CRIMPING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12487185
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS USING FRONT-END PROCESSED WAFER EDGE GEOMETRY METRICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12459065
MULTI-AXIS ALIGNMENT TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Patent 12426752
SURFACE CLEANING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+54.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 191 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month