Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/362,301

OPTOELECTRONIC COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND FOLDED 4F CONVOLUTION LENSES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2023
Priority
Feb 03, 2021 — provisional 63/145,350 +3 more
Examiner
CORRIELUS, JEAN M
Art Unit
2159
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Neurophos Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
863 granted / 1025 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1052
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.7%
+14.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the election of the restriction requirement filed on May 4, 2026, in which claims 24-31 are presented for further examination. Remark Applicant is suggested to cancel the non-elected claims 1-23 from the current application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on November 23, 2025, August 21, 2023 and April 05, 2024 complies with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97, 1.98 and MPEP § 609. It has been placed in the application file. The information referred to therein has been considered as to the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 24-25, 27-29 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu et al., (hereinafter “Wu”) US 20190041610 A1. As to claim 24, Wu discloses an optical system (see Fig. 1A, capturing system includes five lens elements), comprising: a first lens element group comprising at least one lens element that images point objects into collimated beams (see Fig. 1A, a first lens element 110); a second lens element group comprising at least one lens element that has a telecentric entrance pupil in an object space (see Fig. 1A, a second lens element 120); a third lens element group comprising at least one lens element with an a focal field in a collimated space (see Fig. 1A, a third lens element 130); a fourth lens element group comprising at least one lens element for which vignetting occurs in the collimated space (see Fig. 1A, a fourth lens element 140); and a fifth lens element group comprising at least one lens element that does not have a plane of symmetry over which the system of lenses reflected over the plane is unchanged (see Fig. 1A, a fifth lens element 150). As to claim 25, Wu discloses the optical system of claim 24, wherein vignetting of the fourth lens element group occurs only in the collimated space (see [0072] The fourth lens element 140 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 141 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 142 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 141 and the image-side surface 142 being aspheric. The fourth lens element 140 is made of plastic material). As to claim 27, Wu discloses the optical system of claim 26, wherein at least one lens element of the optical system is part of two different lens element groups (see [0069] The first lens element 110 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 111 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 112 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 111 and the image-side surface 112 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the object-side surface 111 thereof. The first lens element 110 is made of plastic material. [0070] The second lens element 120 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 121 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 122 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 121 and the image-side surface 122 being aspheric. The second lens element 120 is made of plastic material. [0071] The third lens element 130 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 131 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 132 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 131 and the image-side surface 132 being aspheric. The third lens element 130 is made of glass material. [0072] The fourth lens element 140 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 141 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 142 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 141 and the image-side surface 142 being aspheric. The fourth lens element 140 is made of plastic material. [0073] The fifth lens element 150 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 151 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 152 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 151 and the image-side surface 152 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the image-side surface 152 thereof. The fifth lens element 150 is made of plastic material). As to claim 28, Wu discloses the optical system of claim 26, wherein at least one of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lens element groups comprises a single lens element that is also the only lens element in another of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lens element groups (see [0069] The first lens element 110 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 111 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 112 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 111 and the image-side surface 112 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the object-side surface 111 thereof. The first lens element 110 is made of plastic material. [0070] The second lens element 120 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 121 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 122 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 121 and the image-side surface 122 being aspheric. The second lens element 120 is made of plastic material. [0071] The third lens element 130 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 131 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 132 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 131 and the image-side surface 132 being aspheric. The third lens element 130 is made of glass material. [0072] The fourth lens element 140 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 141 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 142 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 141 and the image-side surface 142 being aspheric. The fourth lens element 140 is made of plastic material. [0073] The fifth lens element 150 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 151 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 152 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 151 and the image-side surface 152 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the image-side surface 152 thereof. The fifth lens element 150 is made of plastic material). As to claim 29, Wu discloses the optical system of claim 26, wherein seven spherical lens elements of optical glass are used to form the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lens element groups (see [0069] The first lens element 110 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 111 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 112 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 111 and the image-side surface 112 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the object-side surface 111 thereof. The first lens element 110 is made of plastic material. [0070] The second lens element 120 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 121 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 122 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 121 and the image-side surface 122 being aspheric. The second lens element 120 is made of plastic material. [0071] The third lens element 130 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 131 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 132 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 131 and the image-side surface 132 being aspheric. The third lens element 130 is made of glass material. [0072] The fourth lens element 140 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 141 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 142 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 141 and the image-side surface 142 being aspheric. The fourth lens element 140 is made of plastic material. [0073] The fifth lens element 150 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 151 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 152 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 151 and the image-side surface 152 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the image-side surface 152 thereof. The fifth lens element 150 is made of plastic material). As to claim 31, Wu discloses the optical system of claim 26, wherein three aspheric lens elements of silicon are used to form the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lens element groups (see [0071] The third lens element 130 with positive refractive power has an object-side surface 131 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 132 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 131 and the image-side surface 132 being aspheric. The third lens element 130 is made of glass material. [0072] The fourth lens element 140 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 141 being convex in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 142 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, and both the object-side surface 141 and the image-side surface 142 being aspheric. The fourth lens element 140 is made of plastic material. [0073] The fifth lens element 150 with negative refractive power has an object-side surface 151 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, an image-side surface 152 being concave in a paraxial region thereof, both the object-side surface 151 and the image-side surface 152 being aspheric, and at least one convex critical point in an off-axis region of the image-side surface 152 thereof. The fifth lens element 150 is made of plastic material). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 26 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu et al., (hereinafter “Wu”) US 20190041610 A1 in view of , Hudyma et al., (hereinafter “, Hudyma “ US 10386604 B1. As to claim 26, Wu does not explicitly disclose the claimed “the optical system of claim 24, wherein a space-bandwidth product exceeds 1,000,000, a numerical aperture is at least 0.2, and a root-mean-square wavefront error is less than 0.25 wavelengths over the a focal field”. Meanwhile, Hudyma discloses the optical system of claim 24, wherein a space-bandwidth product exceeds 1,000,000, a numerical aperture is at least 0.2, and a root-mean-square wavefront error is less than 0.25 wavelengths over the a focal field (Four thousand (4K) pixels or more are resolvable across the horizontal field of view of the optical assembly in accordance with certain embodiments. An optical assembly in accordance with certain embodiments exhibits a high MTF at the Nyquist frequency (˜200 lp/mm) and/or a high MTF thru focus at ½ Nyquist (˜100 lp/mm). The optical assembly covers a wider field of view than contemporary objectives, e.g., 120 degrees or more. In certain embodiments, a number of resolvable spots within a sensor active area is enhanced in accordance with a larger space bandwidth project, and lateral chromatic aberration (LCA) is less than two pixels or less than 5 microns and color fringing is avoided). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the system of Wu with the teachings of the Hudyma, in order to provide low distortion and low aberrational error. Claim 30 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu et al., (hereinafter “Wu”) US 20190041610 A1 in view of Cook (hereinafter “Cook“ US 20190025555. As to claim 30, Wu does not explicitly disclose the claimed “wherein four aspheric lens elements of zinc selenide (ZnSe) are used to form the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lens element groups”. However, Cook discloses the optical system of claim 26, wherein four aspheric lens elements of zinc selenide (ZnSe) are used to form the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lens element groups (see [0012] In one example of the system the fourth lens is a negative-powered lens arranged to receive the infrared radiation from a viewed scene and to direct the infrared radiation to the third lens, the third lens being arranged to direct the infrared radiation to the second lens, the second lens being arranged to direct the infrared radiation to the first lens, and the first lens being configured to focus the infrared radiation through the aperture stop onto the infrared imaging detector. In one example the first lens is made of arsenic trisulfide (As.sub.2S.sub.3), the second lens is made of barium fluoride (BaF.sub.2), the third lens is made of zinc selenide (ZnSe), and the fourth lens is made of AMTIR-1. In another example the mid-wave infrared spectral band spans at least a wavelength range from 3.0 micrometers to 5.0 micrometers. In another example the long-wave infrared spectral band spans at least a wavelength range from 7.4 micrometers to 10.0 micrometers. [0013] In one example of the system the refractive inverse telephoto lens system further includes a corrector plate positioned between the first lens and the aperture stop. [0014] In another example of the system each of the first, second, third, and fourth lenses is an aspheric lens. In one example the refractive inverse telephoto lens system has a ratio of physical length to effective focal length of 8.0. In another example the refractive inverse telephoto lens system has an optical speed of F/1.95). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the system of Wu to with the teachings of the Hudyma, in order to perform mid-wave infrared and long-wave infrared operations to view and image light energy in an infrared optical spectrum. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20180373003 (involved in having a first lens group (110, 120) including a first lens element including positive refractive power. A second lens element includes positive refractive power. A first lens component and a third lens element include negative refractive power. A fourth lens element includes the positive refractive power. A second lens component includes the negative refractive power. A fifth lens element includes the positive refractive power and a sixth lens element includes the negative refractive power that is affixed to each other, where distance between the lens groups is not fixed.). US 20130308212 (involved in Lens wafer for use in passively aligned optical imaging system (claimed) such as longwave infrared imaging system). US 20090052018 (involved in a two-element objective lens features diffraction-limited performance, wherein each of the two lens elements receives incident radiation and has front and rear surfaces. The lenses form an image on a focal plane. At least three of the surfaces of both lens elements comprise aspheric surfaces. Each lens has an f-number less than about 2, a field-of-view less than about 30 degrees, and an effective focal length less than about 6 inches. The lens elements are made from a material selected to pass radiation in the infrared band of the electromagnetic spectrum). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEAN M CORRIELUS whose telephone number is (571)272-4032. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:30a-10p(Midflex). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ann J Lo can be reached at (571)272-9767. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEAN M CORRIELUS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2159 June 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681938
Methods and Apparatus For Determining A Mood Profile Associated With Media Data
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681927
LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL-BASED QUESTION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12664137
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING DATA LINEAGE AND TRACING DATA CHANGES
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12657021
SCHEMA TRANSFORMATION FOR MANAGING AN APPLICATION BUILD
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651033
UTILIZING A QUERY RESPONSE TO AUTOMATE A TASK ASSOCIATED WITH A WEBPAGE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month