Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/362,389

TUNABLE TRANSCONDUCTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 31, 2023
Examiner
SHAMIRYAN, NAREH
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
41 granted / 43 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 43 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. IN 202341014366, filed on 03/03/2023. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by US 20230396260 by Dempsey et al. Regarding claim 17, Dempsey teaches a method (Fig. 4a, Fig. 6a), comprising: receiving an input voltage (Fig. 4a, 6a Vin) and a tuning code (Fig. 4a #410, Fig. 6a Rin can receive digital signals, par. 41, 54, 73); modifying an impedance of a programmable impedance circuit (Fig. 4a #410, Fig. 6a Rin) based on the tuning code (Par. 41, 54, 73); and providing an output current (Fig. 4a, 6a Iout) based on a value of the input voltage (Vin) and a value of the tuning code (Par. 54, the variable resistor controls output current level or gain). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20230396260 by Dempsey et al. Regarding claim 18, Dempsey teaches the method of claim 17, and while the linear relationship between output current and the resistance value which changes based on the tuning code is not explicitly stated, the relationship between current and resistance is linear according to Ohm’s law V=IR, and by changing the value of the tuning code (and therefore the value of the variable resistance) the current also varies linearly. Regarding claim 19, Dempsey teaches the method of claim 17, wherein modifying the impedance of the programmable impedance circuit includes switching one or more segments of a resistor ladder into a path of current flow in the programmable impedance circuit (Fig. 6a Iin flows into programmable impedance Rin, Par. 76). Dempsey cites another patent US 9583241 by Dempsey in par. 41 which teaches a programmable impedance device that can be used for the programmable impedance in the primary reference. This secondary reference (Fig. 6) shows a ladder type structure of switches and resistors that can be digitally controlled to vary the resistance of a circuit. Resistor ladders are also very well known in the art as taught in Fig. 8 of another reference US 20180191312 by Mu. It would be easy to incorporate this type of structure as well into the programmable impedance circuit of primary reference Dempsey. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art search failed to teach first and second resistors (a voltage divider) that are coupled to the input voltage and ground respectively, along with a programmable impedance circuit with a first terminal coupled to the first resistor, a tuning input terminal, and a third terminal which is coupled to a non-inverting input of an amplifier, the amplifier having an inverting input coupled to ground, and having an output terminal coupled to a current mirror, with the current mirror being coupled to the programmable impedance circuit and an output current terminal. Therefore, independent claims 1 and 11, along with their dependent claims, are allowable. Claim 20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NAREH SHAMIRYAN whose telephone number is (703)756-4616. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:00AM-4:00PM PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren-Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAREH SHAMIRYAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597887
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS OF AMPLIFIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592672
POWER AMPLIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587140
BARELY DOHERTY ET USING ET VCC MODULATION FOR BIAS CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587141
MEASURING INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587144
POWER AMPLIFIER (PA) SELF-HEATING TRACKING FOR WITH SELF-HEATING TIME CONSTANT ESTIMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 43 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month