Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/362,441

ATTACHMENT MECHANISMS AND SYSTEMS FOR USE WITH EDGE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jul 31, 2023
Examiner
MCFARLAND, KATHLEEN MAVOURNEEN
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
92 granted / 153 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
185
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
90.9%
+50.9% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 153 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgment is made of the amendment filed April 13, 2026. The application has been updated accordingly. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites the limitation “wherein the attachment slot is disposed below the attachment slot” which renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear to the examiner how the attachment slot can be disposed below itself. For the purpose of this Office Action the examiner assumes the applicant meant to state that the attachment groove is disposed below the attachment slot. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 7-11 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Parker et al. (2009/0196679) hereinafter Parker. Parker discloses: Claim 1: An attachment mechanism (Fig. 6; 10) comprising: an attachment plate (Fig. 6; 46) comprising an attachment slot (Fig. 6; 48) attachment groove (Fig. 6; 24), and one or more flanges (Fig. 5; 44 left and right) disposed on opposite sides of the attachment plate (Fig. 5; 44 are disposed on opposite sides of 46), wherein one or more of the attachment slot and the attachment groove are configured to receive one or more fastening mechanisms (Fig. 6; 90) to secure the attachment mechanisms to a fixed structure (Fig. 7; 510); a cross plate (Fig. 8B; 30) comprising a cross hole (Fig. 6; 32), wherein the cross plate is fixedly connected to the attachment plate (Fig. 8B; via 28), and wherein the cross plate is disposed parallel to the attachment plate (Fig. 8B; 30 and 46 are parallel) and perpendicular to the one or more flanges (Fig. 8B; 30 is perpendicular to 44 left and right). Claim 2: The attachment mechanism of claim 1, wherein the cross hole (Fig. 6; 32) defines a pivot point of the attachment mechanism (the cross hole is able to allow pivotal movement of 30). Claim 3: The attachment mechanism of claim 1, wherein the cross hole is aligned with one or more of the attachment slot or the attachment groove (Fig. 8B; 32 is aligned with 24). Claim 4: The attachment mechanism of claim 1, wherein the cross plate is fixedly attached to the attachment plate via one or more weldments (Para. [0062]). Claim 7: An attachment system configured to support an edge protection system, wherein the attachment system comprises: an attachment mechanism (Fig. 6; 10) comprising: an attachment plate (Fig. 6; 46) comprising an attachment slot (Fig. 6; 48) an attachment groove (Fig. 6; 24), and one or more flanges (Fig. 5; 44 left and right) disposed on opposite sides of the attachment plate (Fig. 5; 44 are disposed on opposite sides of 46), wherein one or more of the attachment slot and the attachment groove are configured to receive one or more fastening mechanisms (Fig. 6; 27) to secure the attachment mechanisms to a fixed structure (Fig. 7; 510); a cross plate (Fig. 8B; 30) comprising a cross hole (Fig. 6; 32), wherein the cross plate is fixedly connected to the attachment plate (Fig. 8B; via 28), and wherein the cross plate is disposed parallel to the attachment plate (Fig. 8B; 30 and 46 are parallel) and perpendicular to the one or more flanges (Fig. 8B; 30 is perpendicular to 44 left and right); a fixed beam (Fig. 6; 60) fixedly attached to the attachment mechanism (Fig. 6; 10); and a running beam (Fig. 6; 90) operably attached to the fixed beam such that the running beam is configured to move along a length of the fixed beam relative to the attachment mechanism (Fig. 6; 90 moves along a length of 60). Claim 8: The attachment system of claim 7, further comprising a sliding bracket (Fig. 6; 26), wherein the sliding bracket is fixedly attached to the running beam (Fig. 6; via the connection of 60) and operatively engaged with the fixed beam (Fig. 6; 96), such that the sliding bracket is configured to move along the length of the fixed beam relative to the attachment mechanism (Fig. 6; via the movement of 90). Claim 9: The attachment system of claim 7, wherein the cross hole defines a pivot point (the cross hole is able to allow pivotal movement of 30) of the attachment mechanism above the center of gravity of the fixed beam (Fig. 6; 60) such that the fixed beam is prevented from rotating relative to the attachment mechanism (Fig. 6; 60 is prevented from rotating relative to 10). Claim 10: The attachment system of claim 7, wherein the cross hole is aligned with one or more of the attachment slot or the attachment groove (Fig. 8B; 32 is aligned with 24). Claim 11: The attachment system of claim 7, wherein the cross plate is fixedly attached to the attachment plate via one or more weldments (Para. [0062]). Claim 14: The attachment mechanism of claim 1, wherein the one or more flanges includes a first flange (Fig. 5; 44 left) and a second flange (Fig. 5; 44 right), wherein the cross plate is coupled to and extends between the first flange and the second flange (Fig. 8B; 30 extends between 44 left and right). Claim 15: The attachment mechanism of claim 1, wherein the cross plate is positioned outward from the slot of the attachment plate (Fig. 6; 30 is positioned outward from 48) in a direction orthogonal to a surface of the attachment plate (Fig. 6; 30 is orthogonal to a surface of 46). Claims 1, 5-7 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bannan (4,103,853). Bannan discloses: Claim 1: An attachment mechanism (Fig. 3; 12) comprising: an attachment plate (Fig. 3; 34) comprising an attachment slot (Fig. 3; 36) attachment groove (Fig. 3; 52), and one or more flanges (Fig. 3; 40 left and right) disposed on opposite sides of the attachment plate (Fig. 3; 40 are disposed on opposite sides of 34), wherein one or more of the attachment slot and the attachment groove are configured to receive one or more fastening mechanisms (Fig. 2; 38) to secure the attachment mechanisms to a fixed structure (Fig. 2; 14); a cross plate (Fig. 3; 38) comprising a cross hole (Fig. 1; 30), wherein the cross plate is fixedly connected to the attachment plate (Fig. 2; via 50), and wherein the cross plate is disposed parallel to the attachment plate (Fig. 2; 34 and 28 are parallel) and perpendicular to the one or more flanges (Fig. 2; 28 is perpendicular to 40 left and right). Claim 5: The attachment mechanism of claim 1, wherein the attachment slot comprises a keyhole-shaped slot (Fig. 3; 38 is depicted with a keyhole shape). Claim 6: The attachment mechanism of claim 5, wherein the attachment slot (Fig. 3; 36) and the attachment groove (Fig. 3; 52) are disposed on opposite sides of the cross plate (Fig. 3; 36 and 52 are disposed on opposite sides of 28), and wherein the attachment groove is disposed below the attachment slot (Fig. 3; 52 is disposed below 36). Claim 7: An attachment system configured to support an edge protection system, wherein the attachment system comprises: an attachment mechanism (Fig. 3; 12) comprising: an attachment plate (Fig. 3; 34) comprising an attachment slot (Fig. 3; 36) attachment groove (Fig. 3; 52), and one or more flanges (Fig. 3; 40 left and right) disposed on opposite sides of the attachment plate (Fig. 3; 40 are disposed on opposite sides of 34), wherein one or more of the attachment slot and the attachment groove are configured to receive one or more fastening mechanisms (Fig. 2; 38) to secure the attachment mechanisms to a fixed structure (Fig. 2; 14); a cross plate (Fig. 3; 38) comprising a cross hole (Fig. 1; 30), wherein the cross plate is fixedly connected to the attachment plate (Fig. 2; via 50), and wherein the cross plate is disposed parallel to the attachment plate (Fig. 2; 34 and 28 are parallel) and perpendicular to the one or more flanges (Fig. 2; 28 is perpendicular to 40 left and right); a fixed beam (Fig. 4; 70 right) fixedly attached to the attachment mechanism (Fig. 2; 70 is attached 12); and a running beam (Fig. 4; 70 left) operably attached to the fixed beam such that the running beam is configured to move along a length of the fixed beam relative to the attachment mechanism (Fig. 4; 70 left can be moved along a length of 70 right via the positioning of 74). Claim 12: The attachment system of claim 7, wherein the attachment slot comprises a keyhole-shaped slot (Fig. 3; 38 is depicted with a keyhole shape). Claim 13 as best understood by the examiner: The attachment system of claim 12, wherein the attachment slot (Fig. 3; 36) and the attachment groove (Fig. 3; 52) are disposed on opposite sides of the cross plate (Fig. 3; 36 and 52 are disposed on opposite sides of 28), and wherein the attachment slot is disposed below the attachment slot (Fig. 3; 52 is disposed below 36). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kathleen M. McFarland whose telephone number is (571)272-9139. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at (571) 270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kathleen M. McFarland/Examiner, Art Unit 3635 Kathleen M. McFarland Examiner Art Unit 3635 /BRIAN D MATTEI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674358
One piece climbing stick design
5y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674357
LADDER, COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND ACCESSORIES FOR USE THEREWITH
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654043
HARNESS SPACER, HARNESS INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF ATTACHING A HARNESS SPACER
5y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654044
Fall Protection Equipment Connection Status and Control
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12624558
MODULAR DOZER PLATFORM
4y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+12.3%)
3y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month