Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/362,519

COCKPIT MODULE ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 31, 2023
Priority
Oct 27, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0140252
Examiner
PARK, SUNGHYOUN
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Hyundai Motor Group
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
467 granted / 624 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
671
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
72.0%
+32.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 624 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendments, filed 2/10/2026, have been entered and made of record. Claims 1 and 2 have been amended. Claims 1-11 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/10/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In re pages 6 and 7, the applicant states “Claim 1, as amended, recites features that are not disclosed by Monroe. Applicant respectfully submits that Monroe fails to disclose specific mechanical and electrical connections that simultaneously couple the multifunction module to the cover panel and electrically connect the multifunction module to the vehicle via the cover panel, as claimed. In contrast, Monroe does not provide any detailed locking mechanism other than describing general ports (e.g., USB) and magnets for secure docking. For at least the reasons above, the applied reference fail to teach all of the features recited in independent claim 1.”. In response, the examiner respectfully disagrees. Monroe teaches vehicle includes an interior cabin having a plurality of seats, a center stack or instrument panel, a high mount display (HMD), and a community screen or display. As illustrated in Fig. 2 and 3, instrument panel includes a center stack or instrument panel screen or display. HMD extends upwardly from the instrument panel toward the vehicle windshield and is configured to display various information such as vehicle speed, vehicle direction, and navigation information. The upgradable modular system comprises a plurality of docking stations each configured to receive one or more upgradable modular components. In the example implementation, the modular components are configured to connect to and interface with a central computer or controller via the docking stations located throughout the vehicle. The modular docking stations are electrically and/or operably coupled to the vehicle (e.g., vehicle control systems, vehicle power source) and are configured to quickly and easily receive the upgradable modular components. Docking stations are located throughout the vehicle in convenient and accessible locations. For example, with particular reference to FIG. 5, docking stations are configured to be located in/on: the vehicle dashboard in front of the driver seat, the top of vehicle dashboard, the instrument panel, the vehicle dashboard in front of the passenger seat, a forward location proximate the vehicle headliner, an intermediate location proximate vehicle headliner, a rearward location proximate vehicle headliner, in the rear of one or more vehicle seats, and in the interior surface of vehicle doors and/or armrests. (e.g. See, Para.[0044], [0046], [0051], Fig. 2-5) The top portion of instrument panel can be interpreted as a cover panel because it face toward a ceiling surface of a vehicle and positioned above the side portion of instrument panel of the vehicle. The docking stations can be interpreted as coupling parts and electrical connections because it can be respectively configured to simultaneously couple the upgradable modular components to the top portion of instrument panel and electrically connect the upgradable modular components to the vehicle via the top portion of instrument panel. Therefore, Monre discloses a cover panel disposed to face toward a ceiling surface of a vehicle and positioned above an instrument panel of the vehicle; a multifunction module detachably coupled to the cover panel and provided to at least one of display instrument information of the vehicle, hold one or more portable devices or any combination thereof, wherein the cover panel and the multifunction module include coupling parts and electrical connections, and wherein the coupling parts and the electrical connections are respectively configured to simultaneously couple the multifunction module to the cover panel and electrically connect the multifunction module to the vehicle via the cover panel as amended independent claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Monroe Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Monroe et al.(USPubN 2018/0178652; hereinafter Monroe). As per claim 1, Monroe teaches a cockpit module assembly for a vehicle, comprising: a cover panel disposed to face toward a ceiling surface of a vehicle and positioned above an instrument panel of the vehicle (“As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, vehicle 10 includes an interior cabin 26 having a plurality of seats 28, a center stack or instrument panel 30, a high mount display (HMD) 32, and a community screen or display 34. As illustrated, instrument panel 30 includes a center stack or instrument panel screen or display 36. HMD 32 extends upwardly from the instrument panel 30 toward the vehicle windshield and is configured to display various information such as vehicle speed, vehicle direction, and navigation information.” in Para.[0044], Fig. 2, The top portion of instrument panel can be interpreted as a cover panel because it face toward a ceiling surface of a vehicle and positioned above the side portion of instrument panel of the vehicle.); and a multifunction module detachably coupled to the cover panel and provided to at least one of display instrument information of the vehicle, hold one or more portable devices or any combination thereof(“The upgradable modular system 50 comprises a plurality of docking stations 52 each configured to receive one or more upgradable modular components 54. In the example implementation, the modular components 54 are configured to connect to and interface with a central computer or controller 56 via the docking stations 52 located throughout the vehicle 10. The modular docking stations 52 are electrically and/or operably coupled to the vehicle (e.g., vehicle control systems, vehicle power source) and are configured to quickly and easily receive the upgradable modular components 54.” in Para.[0046], “a list of upgradable modular components 54 includes central controller 56, displays/touch screens 60, smart climate controls 62, smart lighting 64, smart buttons 66, slide controls 68, cameras/sensors 70, smart buttons with displays 72, a customizable rotate button 74, and a device holder or support 76” in Para.[0047], “Docking stations 52 are located throughout the vehicle 10 in convenient and accessible locations. For example, with particular reference to FIG. 5, docking stations 52 are configured to be located in/on: the vehicle dashboard 42 in front of the driver seat 28a (52a), the top of vehicle dashboard 42 (52b), the instrument panel 30 (52c), the vehicle dashboard 42 in front of the passenger seat 28b (52d), a forward location proximate the vehicle headliner 38 (52e), an intermediate location proximate vehicle headliner 38 (52f), a rearward location proximate vehicle headliner 38 (52g), in the rear of one or more vehicle seats 28 (52h), and in the interior surface of vehicle doors 22, 24 and/or armrests 40 (52i). However, it will be appreciated that docking stations 52 may be included in other locations throughout the vehicle such as in vehicle headliner 38 above passengers or under the vehicle hood (not shown)” in Para.[0051]). wherein the cover panel and the multifunction module include coupling parts and electrical connections, and wherein the coupling parts and the electrical connections are respectively configured to simultaneously couple the multifunction module to the cover panel and electrically connect the multifunction module to the vehicle via the cover panel(Para.[0046], [0051], The docking stations can be interpreted as coupling parts and electrical connections because it can be respectively configured to simultaneously couple the upgradable modular components to the top portion of instrument panel and electrically connect the upgradable modular components to the vehicle via the top portion of instrument panel.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 are allowed. Reasons for Allowance The prior art of record (in particular, Monroe et al.(USPubN 2018/0178652; hereinafter Monroe)) does not disclose, with respect to claim 9, A multifunction module for a vehicle, the vehicle including a cover panel disposed to face toward a ceiling surface of the vehicle and covering a side of an instrument panel, the multifunction module comprising: a main body detachably attachable to the cover panel, wherein the multifunction module is configured to at least one of display instrument information of the vehicle, hold one or more portable devices or any combination thereof; one or more holding parts disposed on an outer surface of the main body and configured to hold the portable device, the instrument or the combination thereof; one or more coupling parts disposed on one or more sides of the main body for attachment to the cover; and one or more conductors disposed on a surface of the main body such that upon attachment of the multifunction module to the cover, the one or more conductors of the multifunction module are connected to one or more conductors of the cover panel, wherein the cover panel is electrically connected to the vehicle and the one or more portable devices are able to receive power via the cover panel as claimed. Rather, Monroe et al. discloses a vehicle includes an interior cabin and a plurality of modular docking stations fixedly disposed in the interior cabin. Each modular docking station is configured to removably receive one or more modular components. The one or more modular components interchangeably connect to the plurality of modular docking stations to enable relocation of each modular component of the one or more modular components in a desired modular docking station of the plurality of docking stations. Accordingly, claims 2-11 are allowed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUNGHYOUN PARK whose telephone number is (571)270-1333. The examiner can normally be reached M - Thur 6:00 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THAI Q TRAN can be reached at (571)272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUNGHYOUN PARK/Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684227
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR EDITING VIDEO USING OBJECTS OF INTEREST AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670935
SCRATCHPAD CREATION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666110
MEDIA PLAYBACK METHOD FOR IMPROVING PLAYBACK RESPONSE TIME AND RELATED MEDIA PLAYBACK DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12641190
REAL TIME VIDEO EDITING
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641741
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 624 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month