DETAILED ACTION
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the submission filed 2026-03-03 (herein referred to as the Reply) where claim(s) 1-15 are pending for consideration.
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on identified above has been entered.
35 USC §103 - Claim Rejections
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or non-obviousness.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), and further view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322)
Claim(s) 1, 15
ADJAKPLE_753 teaches
establishing a
Packets are communicated in accordance with the QoS profile/mark. <FIG(s). 10, 26, 27, 34, 35; para. 0075-0086, 0091, 0134, 0154-0158, 0168, 0177-0178, 0190>.
transmitting via the
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
nodes in a network are particularly a server and a base station
a single data radio bearer for transmitting data packets;
However in a similar endeavor, LIU_174 teaches
nodes in a network are particularly a server and a base station Source/Target base station receives a multicast QoS flow from a service server forwarded by the source base station, where the multicast QoS flow includes data of the first service. <para. 0089-0090, 0092>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by LIU_174. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide improved continuity of service when handover occurs <Background, Summary>
However in a similar endeavor, WANG_322 teaches
transmitting via the single data radio bearer the first and second data packets, according to the assigned first and second transmission quality parameters, respectively. A single DRB can be configured to include a plurality of packets with respectively different service priorities. <FIG(s). 5; para. 0008-0012, 0045, 0107>.
Accordingly, WANG_322 demonstrates that using a single data radio bearer that contains packets of different priority/service levels was well known in the art.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753 and LIU_174 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by WANG_322. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide a method and a communication device for sending uplink data packets, which can improve service quality. <para. 0004>.
Claim(s) 2
ADJAKPLE_753 teaches
wherein the information included within each downlink data packets is data added to a header of the downlink data packet. Each QoS profile may be associated and identified by a mark. QoS mark included in the received packet header. <FIG(s). 10, 26, 27, 34, 35; para. 0075-0086, 0091, 0134, 0154-0158, 0168, 0177-0178, 0190>.
Claim(s) 5
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
establishing one or more Quality of Service flows between the base station and the server according to requirements of the first and second transmission quality parameters.
However in a similar endeavor, LIU_174 teaches
establishing one or more Quality of Service flows between the base station and the server according to requirements of the first and second transmission quality parameters. Source/Target base station receives a multicast QoS flow from a service server forwarded by the source base station in accordance with the QoS parameter/profile. <para. 0089-0092>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by LIU_174. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide improved continuity of service when handover occurs <Background, Summary>
Claim(s) 12
ADJAKPLE_753 teaches
A non-transitory computer program product comprising computer executable instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, causes the computer to carry out the method of claim 1. Disclosed embodiments can be carried out by executable instructions <para. 0133>.
Claim(s) 13
ADJAKPLE_753 teaches
one or more base stations; and a data processing apparatus comprising a processor and a non-transitory computer storage device having stored thereon computer executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data processing apparatus to carry out the method of claim 1. Packets of a flow may be assigned one or more QoS parameters. In one embodiment, a packet mark (or marker) is used to uniquely associate data packets characterized by a given Traffic Flow Filter (TFF) or Traffic Flow filter Template (TFT) with predefined matching QoS profile(s). Each QoS profile may be associated and identified by a mark. QoS mark included in the received packet header (FEP header) to identify the upper layer Service Access Point (SAP) for the delivery of the received packet. In another embodiment the packet is marked with a packet flow identifier. Embodiments are applicable to downlink, uplink or both <FIG(s). 10, 26, 27, 34, 35; para. 0075-0086, 0091, 0134, 0154-0158, 0168, 0177-0178, 0190>.
Claim(s) 14
ADJAKPLE_753 teaches
further comprising a plurality of UEs. For example 102a-d. <FIG(s). 10, 26, 27, 34, 35, 52A, 52B; para. 0075-0086, 0091, 0134, 0154-0158, 0168, 0177-0178, 0190, 0361-0368>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of NAM_147 (US20100329147)
Claim(s) 3
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the information included within each downlink data packets is a packet type of each downlink data packet.
However in a similar endeavor, NAM_147 teaches
wherein the information included within each downlink data packets is a packet type of each downlink data packet. Each packet header information include packet type <para. 0051>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by NAM_147. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide link aggregation that provides redundant communication paths while at the same time increasing transmission bandwidth <para. 0001>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), in view of NAM_147 (US20100329147), and further view of PUENTE PESTAÑA_984 (US20220393984)
Claim(s) 4
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the packet type is included within a GTP-U header.
However in a similar endeavor, PUENTE PESTAÑA_984 teaches
wherein the packet type is included within a GTP-U header. GTP-U header includes information indicating a type, such as class indicator <para. 0126>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174, WANG_322 and NAM_147 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by PUENTE PESTAÑA_984. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide improved user plane traffic classification in a communications system. <para. 0029>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of WANG_297 (US20210127297)
Claim(s) 6
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the first and second transmission quality parameters for the first and second downlink data packets are determined by the base station.
However in a similar endeavor, WANG_297 teaches
wherein the first and second transmission quality parameters for the first and second downlink data packets are determined by the base station. QoS parameter is determined by primary base station. <para. 0165-0169>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by WANG_297. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to support the network evolution from 4G to 5G <para. 0007, Solution to Problem>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of ZHANG_420 (US20240155420)
Claim(s) 6
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the first and second transmission quality parameters for the first and second downlink data packets are determined by the base station.
However in a similar endeavor, ZHANG_420 teaches
wherein the first and second transmission quality parameters for the first and second downlink data packets are determined by the base station. One or more other QoS characteristics for a respective QoS flow may be determined by the base station. <para. 0098>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by ZHANG_420. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to improved methods, systems, devices, and apparatuses that support configuration for asymmetric quality of service (QoS) flows <Summary>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), in view of WANG_297 (US20210127297), and further view of LUO_215 (US20220104215)
Claim(s) 7
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the base station determines the first or second transmission quality parameters for each of the first and second downlink data packets by receiving information from a control plane node.
However in a similar endeavor, LUO_215 teaches
wherein the base station determines the first or second transmission quality parameters for each of the first and second downlink data packets by receiving information from a control plane node. The assistance information may include transmission quality parameters such as periodicity, burst, direction, etc. Assistance information is received by base station by SMF and/or AMF. <para. 0162>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174, WANG_322 and WANG_297 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by LUO_215. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to reduce latency associated with communications in backhaul network, such an IAB network. <para. 0042>.
Claim(s) 8
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the control plane node is an access and mobility management function, AMF.
However in a similar endeavor, LUO_215 teaches
wherein the control plane node is an access and mobility management function, AMF. Assistance information is received by base station by AMF. <para. 0162>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174, WANG_322 and WANG_297 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by LUO_215. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to reduce latency associated with communications in backhaul network, such an IAB network. <para. 0042>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of SUN_848 (US20220150848)
Claim(s) 9
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the first or second transmission quality parameters comprise any one or more of: 5QI value, priority level, packet error rate, maximum data burst volume, averaging window, bit rate, resource type, frame rate, periodicity, compression characteristic, and packet delay budget.
However in a similar endeavor, SUN_848 teaches
wherein the first or second transmission quality parameters comprise any one or more of: priority level, QoS parameter is a priority level value. <FIG(s). 3; para. 0048-0051; Claim(s) 7>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by SUN_848. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide improved method of controlling transmission power o <para. 0001>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of MARGOLIN_258 (US20180139258)
Claim(s) 9
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the first or second transmission quality parameters comprise any one or more of: 5QI value, priority level, packet error rate, maximum data burst volume, averaging window, bit rate, resource type, frame rate, periodicity, compression characteristic, and packet delay budget.
However in a similar endeavor, MARGOLIN_258 teaches
wherein the first or second transmission quality parameters comprise any one or more of: frame rate, quality parameter may include at least one of a bitrate, a resolution, a frame rate, or a compression parameter for the content. <para. 0005>.
compression characteristic, and quality parameter may include at least one of a bitrate, a resolution, a frame rate, or a compression parameter for the content. <para. 0005>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by MARGOLIN_258. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to to leverage aggregated network statistics for enhancing quality and user experience for live video streaming from mobile devices. <para. 0001>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of KWOK_998 (US20210409998)
Claim(s) 10
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the information included within the first and second downlink data packets is attributes of the data packet, and wherein the method further comprises determining, by the base station, transmission quality parameters for each data packet based on the attributes of the data packet.
However in a similar endeavor, KWOK_998 teaches
wherein the information included within the first and second downlink data packets is attributes of the data packet, and wherein the method further comprises determining, by the base station, transmission quality parameters for each data packet based on the attributes of the data packet. QoE goals/requirements can be determined based on packet attributes. <FIG(s). 1, 2, 5; para. 0027-0036, 0039-0041>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by KWOK_998. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to determine whether to route individual data packets to a UE over an LTE connection and/or a 5G connection, based on which connections are most likely to achieve QoE goals associated with the individual data packets. <para. 0018>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of MIJATOVIC_346 (US20070155346)
Claim(s) 11
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the server is a user plane function, UPF.
However in a similar endeavor, MIJATOVIC_346 teaches
wherein the server is a user plane function, UPF. PoC server comprises control-plane functions and user-plane functions providing <FIG(s). 1; para. 0019>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by MIJATOVIC_346. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide enhanced communications services to a user in a mobile communications system<para. 0001-0006>.
Claim(s) is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADJAKPLE_753 (US20200267753) in view of LIU_174 (WO2021179174), in view of WANG_322 (WO2023092322), and further view of PARK_346 (US20200221346)
Claim(s) 11
ADJAKPLE_753 does not explicitly teach
wherein the server is a user plane function, UPF.
However in a similar endeavor, PARK_346 teaches
wherein the server is a user plane function, UPF. PoC server comprises control-plane functions and user-plane functions providing <FIG(s). 1; para. 0019>.
wherein the server is a user plane function, UPF. a server including a user plane function (UPF). <FIG(s). 19C; para. 0221-0223; Claim(s) 6>.
Before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art to have modified the system/techniques disclosed by ADJAKPLE_753, LIU_174 and WANG_322 with the embodiment(s) disclosed by PARK_346. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide a method of configuring a network slice for each radio access technology (RAT) and for setting and operating a policy for each network slice. <para. 0012>.
Response to Arguments
The Reply’s arguments s have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the rejection(s), which was necessitated by the Applicant’s amendments, being used in the current rejection.
English Translations of Non-English Documents
Text herein may rely upon a non-English document. Any citations used herein for said document refers to paragraphs numbers in the (English) translated document, not the original non-English document.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRE TACDIRAN whose telephone number is 571-272-1717. The examiner can normally be reached on M-TH, 10-5PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached on 571-270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ANDRE TACDIRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Prosecution Insights