Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/363,117

SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Priority
Aug 24, 2017 — provisional 62/549,560 +1 more
Examiner
GIULIANI, THOMAS ANTHONY
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Medtronic Advanced Energy LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
570 granted / 745 resolved
+6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.7%
+39.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 745 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Claims 10-12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election of Species B and Species 4 (which has been interpreted as Species 1 since it is drawn to fig. 4, and since no ‘Species 4’ was ever identified) was made without traverse in the reply filed on April 23, 2026. Claims 1-8 are being examined while claims 9-12 are withdrawn from further consideration. While Applicant argues that claim 9 is drawn to the elected species, this is not found persuasive since the 'plurality of RF returns' limitation is not shown in the elected species. Rather, this limitation is depicted in figs. 1 and 3. Therefore claim 9 is withdrawn from further consideration for being drawn to a nonelected invention. Specification The disclosure is objected to because the first paragraph does not provide the most current status for the related application. That is, the parent application is referenced as a U.S. application even though it has issued as a patent. The paragraph should be amended to include the appropriate patent number. Furthermore, the lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 8 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1 (line 6), the first occurrence of “and the” should be deleted; In claim 8 (line 1), “the determined” should be replaced with -determining the-; In claim 8 (line 3), “dived” should be replaced with -divided-. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Azamian, U.S. 2016/0128767 (hereinafter Azamian). Regarding claim 1, Azamian discloses an electrosurgical unit comprising: an RF output configured to be coupled to an electrosurgical device (note paragraph 219); an RF return capable of being coupled to a surgical retractor (note paragraph 219); and a controller operably coupled to the RF output and the RF return, the controller configured to determine an impedance in tissue at a surgical area electrically disposed between the RF output and the RF return (note paragraphs 371 and 541). Regarding claims 2-3, Azamian discloses (see above) an electrosurgical unit comprising a ‘detection’ circuit ‘operably coupled’ to the RF return and the controller, wherein the detection circuit includes a ‘return electrode monitoring circuit’ (i.e., contact/pressure sensor - note paragraph 304). Regarding claim 4, Azamian discloses (see above) an electrosurgical unit wherein the controller includes a processor and memory device (note paragraph 363). Regarding claim 5, Azamian discloses (see above) an electrosurgical unit necessarily comprising a ‘RF circuit’ operably coupled to the controller and the RF output (since the controller causes RF energy to be delivered via the RF output). Regarding claims 6-7, Azamian discloses (see above) an electrosurgical unit wherein the controller is configured to output the determined impedance, and wherein the output includes a visualization (note paragraph 390). Regarding claim 8, Azamian discloses (see above) an electrosurgical unit wherein determining the impedance includes calculating the difference between a voltage at the RF output and a voltage at the RF return divided by a current received at the RF return (note paragraphs 371 and 541). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: U.S. 2015/0133911 (Batchelor). U.S. 2010/0324548 (Godara). U.S. 6,958,064 (Rioux). U.S. 5,542,916 (Hirsch). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS ANTHONY GIULIANI whose telephone number is (571)270-3202. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Rodden can be reached at 303-297-4276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS A GIULIANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12611245
ELECTRODE DEVICE FOR BLOCKING OR CONTROLLING NERVES IN BODY
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611250
ELECTROSURGICAL SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AND TREATING BIOLOGICAL TISSUE
1y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605150
SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR CORING TISSUE
5y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12594116
METHOD FOR TREATING CHRONIC RHINITIS
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12569339
Aortic Valve Lithotripsy Balloon
4y 10m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.2%)
3y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 745 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month