Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/363,578

GLOVE WITH LONGITUDINAL STAYS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
PATEL, TAJASH D
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Summit Glove, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1266 granted / 1567 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1567 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The request filed on August 6, 2025 for a request for continued examination (RCE) is acceptable and a RCE has been established. An action on the RCE follows: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 4-15 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over over Ganz (US 4,329,312) in view of Herbruck (US 2,036,413). Ganz discloses, as shown for example in FIG. 1, a glove (11) including a wrist region from region generally extending from 11c to palm region 27; reference annotated copy of FIG. 1 below); a palm region from palm zone/region (27); ref. annot. FIG. 1 below) extending outwardly from the wrist region extending outwardly generally in the direction from 11c towards fingers (23); a plurality of digit regions/fingers (23) and frontal thumb (25); ref. annot. FIG. 1 below) extending outwardly from the palm region extending outwardly generally in the direction from the palm zone/region (27) to the distal end ( 23 & 25) defining at least one griping zone oriented substantially parallel to an imaginary axis thereof and at least one crotch area/zone between thumb (25) and finger (23) and/or between adjacent fingers (23); ref. annot. Figs’ 1 & 3 below) defined between two adjacent digit regions of the plurality of digit regions (e.g., ref. annot. Figs’ 1 & 3 below). Further, a texture pattern provided on the at least one crotch area defines first, second, third and fourth crotch areas between each of the plurality of digit regions/fingers (23) as shown in figure 1 (e.g., exterior textured surface 11b; see at least Col. 3 lines 16-28 "The glove film on the now inverted form is thereupon sprayed with an aqueous mix of uncured rubber latex...an important feature that the latex droplets are impacted onto the surface from two sources, angularly differently directed, and preferably intersecting spray relation, to afford effective coverage of the glove gripping surfaces including the palm, fingers, and thumb", Col. 2 lines 41-43 "The exterior textured surface 11b of the glove 11 is formed by impacting the gripping surfaces with fine droplets of an aqueous rubber latex solution", Col. 3 lines 45-49 "the spatial intersection of the paths of the droplets from the two spray sources in front of the glove form aids in providing coverage on the inner or crotch-facing surface of the thumb film which faces toward the palm of the form 21", Col. 4 lines 8-11 "The center lines of the nozzles are preferably directed along lines intersecting the central sections of the fingers 23 and thumb 25, thereby affording good coverage of the palm, finger and thumb gripping areas", and Col. 5 lines 7-11 "The net result is a seamless homogeneous rubber latex glove which...has highly desirable textured surfaces on both its inner and outer surfaces"; see FIG. 3 showing spray pattern providing the texture on at least one crotch area; see stippling in FIG. 1 and Figs’ 4 & 5 showing the texture; note that the preamble of the claim uses the open- ended transitional phrase "comprising", as such, the prior art may include more than that set forth in the claim. However, Ganz does no disclose at least one stay provided on a digit region of the plurality of digit regions of the glove and wherein digit region which reduces a circumference of the digit region. Herbruck teaches, as shown for example in FIG. 3, a glove having at least one stay (e.g., transvers grooves only on the palm sides of the fingers and thumb; see at least pg. 2 col. 1 lines 22-26 "Fig. 3, a view similar to Fig. 1, illustrating another embodiment of the improved glove with curved fingers and thumb, and with transverse grooves only on the palm sides of the fingers and thumb, and without bulges"; ref. annot. copy of FIG. 3 of Herbruck below) provided on a digit region of the plurality of digit regions of the glove and wherein the at least one stay comprises a concave/arcuate indentation formed in the digit region and projects into an interior cavity thereof that frictionally engages the finger which reduces a circumference of the digit region (e.g., see at least pg. 2 col. 1 lines 22-26 "Fig. 3, a view similar to Fig. 1, illustrating another embodiment of the improved glove with curved fingers and thumb, and with transverse grooves only on the palm sides of the fingers and thumb, and without bulges"; ref. enlarged portion of annot. FIG. 3 of Herbruck below) that defines a second circumference without the bulges forming at least one gripping zone on both first and second sides, in order to minimize strains in the material of the formed glove itself and upon the hand of the user without impairing the sensitiveness of the fingers in a glove of any particular wall thickness and to provide the advantage of facilitating manipulation of the gloves and increasing the life thereof (e.g., see at least pg. 1 col. 2 lines 1-7 and pg. 2 col. 2 lines 37-39). Further, the at least one stay defines first and second stay located on each of the index, middle, ring and little finger are located opposed to and laterally aligned with respect to one another as shown in figure 2. The at least one gripping zone having the at least first and second stay being spaced apart on first and second sides and extends for less than a quarter of the circumference of the at least one digit region as shown in figure 3. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the glove of Ganz to include a digit region of the plurality of digit regions of the glove and including a concave/arcuate indentation defining the opposed, spaced apart first and second stays being formed in the digit region of respective index, middle, ring and little finger which reduces a circumference of the digit region defining a first circumference smaller than that second circumference having no bulges, in order to minimize strains upon the hand of the user without impairing the sensitiveness of the fingers in a glove of any particular wall thickness and to provide the advantage of facilitating manipulation of the gloves and increasing the life thereof, as taught by Herbruck. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made each of the first and second stays of Ganz when viewed with Herbruck can be provided on either back and front thereof to provide proper frictionally support to prevent the glove from slipping about contact between the at least one gripping zone and the fingers when worn or depending on end use thereof. With regard to claim 14, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the textured glove of Ganz when viewed with Herbruck ‘413 includes but not limited to the texture provided on an exterior surface between opposed side surfaces of first and second digit regions, partially onto an exterior of a front of the palm region, back of the palm region, etc. as shown in figure 1 so that the glove provides increased gipping area with minimized strain on the fingers when the device is worn. With regard to claim 15, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the glove of Ganz formed by impacting the gripping surfaces with fine droplets of an aqueous rubber latex solution col. 3 lines 45-49 when viewed with Herbruck can include but not limited to a micro-etching process, etc. as an alternative but equivalent means for gripping in order to make the device cost effective or depending on particular end use thereof. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 16-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art cited on PTO-892 discloses a digit sheath having an indentation with a circumference smaller than a second circumference defined about a tip portion thereof. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEJASH PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-4993. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton Ostrup can be reached at (571) 272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. October 29, 2025 /TAJASH D PATEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 16, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593885
SHOCK-ABSORBING ASSEMBLY AND BODY PROTECTION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593881
MOLLE RETENTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595606
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595607
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594894
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STITCHING A THREE DIMENSIONAL FORMED COMPONENT AND COMPONENTS FORMED FROM THE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month