Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/364,086

COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING RODENT INGRESS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Priority
Aug 02, 2022 — provisional 63/394,525
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Delstar Technologies Inc.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
652 granted / 1155 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 12, 2026 has been entered. Withdrawn Rejections Any rejections and or objections, made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn due to Applicant’s amendments and/or arguments in the response dated June 12, 2026. However, new rejections may have been made using the same prior art if still applicable to the newly presented amendments and/or arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 7, 8, 10, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yaeger (USPGPub 2018/0245730A1) in view of Casagrande (WO 2009/0144442 A1) and Short (USPN 5,271,999). Yaeger discloses a rodent barrier (Figures; Abstract) comprising: a wire mesh layer comprising stainless steel (Paragraph 0019) and having a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface (Paragraph 0019; Figure 4); an adhesive extending through the wire mesh layer from the first surface to the second surface, wherein the adhesive layer is configured to bond the first surface of the wire mesh layer to a separate surface as part of a duct tape structure (Paragraph 0019; Figure 4) as in claim 1. In claim 7, the cylindrical wire mesh is cut along a transverse axis to form a planar wire mesh layer (The recitation that “the cylindrical wire mesh is cut along a transverse axis to form a planar wire mesh layer” is a process recitation in a product. Product claims including process recitations are not limited by the manipulation of the recited steps, only the structure implied by the steps. See MPEP 2113. In the present instance, the process steps imply that the wire is in the form of a sheet. The reference discloses such a product. See Figure 1B). However, Yaeger fails to disclose the adhesive secures the first surface of the wire mesh layer to a separate target surface, and secures the wire mesh layer to the protective layer, the adhesive layer comprises a thermoplastic rubber; the protective layer comprises a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film having a thickness of 25 µm to about 150 µm, the adhesive layer comprises a hotmelt adhesive, the hotmelt adhesive comprises an additive, and the additive comprises an antioxidant. Casagrande et al. teach a barrier (Figures; Abstract) comprising a mesh layer (Page 5, line 27 to Page 6, line 2), adhesive extending through the wire mesh layer from the first surface to the second surface, the adhesive secures the first surface of the wire mesh layer to a separate target surface, and secures the wire mesh layer to the protective layer (Figure 2, #2 and 3; Page 5, line 22 to Page 6, line 18; Claim 1; Page 3, line 15 – 32) for the purpose of trapping insects (Page 5, lines 4 – 11). Short teaches a duct tape (Abstract) having an adhesive layer comprises a thermoplastic rubber (Abstract); and a protective layer bonded to the adhesive at the second surface (Column 5, lines 5 – 36), wherein the protective layer comprises a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film (Column 5, lines 32 – 36) having a thickness of 25 µm to about 150 µm (Column 8, lines 48 – 53, wherein 1.6 mils is equal to 40.6 µm), the adhesive layer comprises a hotmelt adhesive (Abstract), the hotmelt adhesive comprises an additive (Abstract), the additive comprises an antioxidant (Abstract), and the protective layer comprises low density polyethylene (LDPE) (Column 5, lines 32 – 36) for the purpose of having a tape that may be removed from a surface without leaving behind adhesive (Abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a duct tape made with a protective layer and hotmelt adhesive and an adhesive that surrounds the mesh in Yaeger in order to trap insects as taught by Casagrande and to have a tape that may be removed from a surface without leaving behind adhesive as taught by Short. Claims 3, 5, and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yaeger (USPGPub 2018/0245730A1) in view of Casagrande (WO 2009/0144442 A1) and Short (USPN 5,271,999) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Ono et al. (USPGPub 2022/0056316 A1). Yaeger, as modified with Short and Casagrande, discloses the claimed invention except for a release layer removably coupled to the adhesive layer, the wire mesh layer is formed from a cylindrical wire mesh, and the cylindrical wire mesh comprises a knitted sleeve. Ono et al. teach a laminate structure (Abstract) with a release layer removably coupled to an adhesive layer (Paragraph 0066), the cylindrical wire mesh comprises a knitted sleeve (Paragraphs 0068 and 0092), the adhesive layer comprises a hotmelt adhesive (Paragraph 0074), the hotmelt adhesive comprises a thermoplastic rubber (Paragraph 0056), and the outer protective layer comprises cotton (Paragraph 0068) or silicone (Paragraph 0056) for the purpose of having a laminate structure with excellent adhesive characteristics (Paragraph 0013). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the specific materials in the modified Yaeger in order to form a laminate structure with excellent adhesive characteristics as taught by Ono et al. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 3, 5 – 8, 10, and 11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. In response to Applicant’s argument that Yaeger fails to disclose “the adhesive secures the first surface of the wire mesh layer to a separate target surface, and secures the wire mesh layer to the protective layer”, please see the newly presented rejection in view of Casagrande. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 June 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 11 earlier events
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673779
LOW EMISSIVITY MATERIAL FOR INFLATABLE SAFETY PRODUCTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662819
ROOF MEMBRANE WITH A FOLDED RELEASE LINER
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661871
WINDSHIELD PROTECTOR AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING AND USING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655324
SEAL MEMBER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655326
CONDUCTIVE PATTERNS AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.1%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month