Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/364,117

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Examiner
PHAN, STEVE QUOC
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-68.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
13
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
88.9%
+48.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Goup I (claims 1-6) in the reply filed on 12/24/2025 is acknowledged. Claim 7 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoshida (US 20190165130 A1). Regarding claim 1, Yoshida discloses a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device, comprising: forming a first insulating layer (21) on a first nitride semiconductor layer (14) having a first principal surface (Fig. 3C); forming, on the first insulating layer, a mask (22) including a first mask opening (22a) through which a portion of the first insulating layer is exposed (Fig. 3C); forming a first opening (21a) in the first insulating layer through the first mask opening, to expose a portion of the first nitride semiconductor layer (Fig. 3A); forming a second nitride semiconductor layer (15) on the first nitride semiconductor layer inside the first opening, through the first mask opening (Fig. 4B); forming a first electrode (15) on the second nitride semiconductor layer, so as to cover a boundary line between the second nitride semiconductor layer and the first insulating layer, through the first mask opening (Fig. 4B); and removing the mask after the forming the first electrode (Fig. 4C, HF acid is used to remove the mask, paragraph 30). Regarding claim 2, Yoshida discloses the method for manufacturing the semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the mask includes a second mask opening (22b) through which another portion of the first insulating layer is exposed (21b, Fig 3A-3C), the method further comprising: forming a second opening in the first insulating layer (21b) through the second mask opening (22b), to expose another portion of the first nitride semiconductor layer, simultaneously as the forming of the first opening (Fig. 3A-C); forming a third nitride semiconductor layer (16) on the first nitride semiconductor layer inside the second opening through the second mask opening (Fig. 4B), simultaneously as the forming the second nitride semiconductor layer; and forming a second electrode (32) on the third nitride semiconductor layer (16) through the second mask opening, so as to cover a boundary line between the third nitride semiconductor layer and the first insulating layer, simultaneously as the forming of the first electrode (Fig. 4A-4C). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshida in view of Matsuda (US 20180197978 A1). Regarding claim 3, Yoshida does not disclose the method for manufacturing the semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, further comprising, after the forming the first electrode, forming a second insulating layer on the first insulating layer, so as to cover the first electrode; and forming a gate electrode on the second insulating layer. However, Matsuda discloses the method for manufacturing the semiconductor device as claimed in claim 1, further comprising, after the forming the first electrode (20), forming a second insulating layer (32A) on the first insulating layer (30), so as to cover the first electrode (22); and forming a gate electrode (24A) on the second insulating layer (Fig. 8B). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Yoshida in view of Matsuda to have a second insulating layer on the first insulating layer covering the electrode of a high electron mobility transistor. Doing so would suppress gate leakage current, and passivate the surface states and control the electric field distribution. Regarding claim 5, Yoshida discloses the method for manufacturing the semiconductor device as claimed in claim 3, further comprising: forming a third opening (21c) in the second insulating layer and the first insulating layer (21), the forming the gate electrode (33), wherein the gate electrode is formed to make contact with the first nitride semiconductor layer (14) through the third opening (Fig. 5B). Yoshida does not disclose the second insulating layer. Matsuda discloses a second insulating layer (32A) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Yoshida in view of Matsuda to have a second insulating layer on the first insulating layer of a high electron mobility transistor. Doing so would suppress gate leakage current and enhance breakdown voltage. Claims 4, 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshida in view of Matsuda (US 20180197978 A1) as applied to claim 3 and 5 above, in further view of Makabe (US 20190027577 A1). Regarding claim 4, none of the prior references disclose the method for manufacturing the semiconductor device as claimed in claim 3, wherein an upper surface of the second nitride semiconductor layer is an N-polar surface. However, Makabe discloses the channel layer (13) has an N-polar surface (paragraph 40). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination as discussed above with Makabe such that the upper surface of the second nitride semiconductor layer is an N-polar surface. Doing so would enable superior electron confinement and enable high density two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG). Regarding claim 6, none of the prior references disclose the method for manufacturing the semiconductor device as claimed in claim 5, wherein an upper surface of the second nitride semiconductor layer is a Ga-polar surface. However, Makabe discloses the barrier layer (12) is a Ga-polar surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination as discussed above with Makabe such that the upper surface of the second nitride semiconductor layer is an Ga-polar surface. Doing so would enable superior electron confinement and enable high density two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVE Q PHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1227. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at (571) 272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE PHAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /MARLON T FLETCHER/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month