Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/364,208

INK SET AND IMAGE RECORDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Examiner
HALL, DEVE V.
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
676 granted / 902 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
941
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 902 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO 2019/131215 (hereinafter, MATSUMOTO). Regarding claim 1, MATSUMOTO teaches an ink set containing one or more of a first ink and second ink. The first ink is a water-based ink containing a colorant (A), a polymer (B), an organic solvent (C), and water. The first ink contains one or more pigments selected from chromatic organic pigments and black pigments (p. 5). The colorant (A) (chromatic pigment and a black pigment) is at least one selected from (i) self-dispersion pigment and (ii) particles in which the pigment is dispersed as a polymer dispersant (p. 9). The polymer (B) can be used as the polymer dispersant and the polymer of the water-insoluble polymer. Examples of polymer (B) includes styrene butadiene resin, styrene-acrylic resin, vinyl acetate resin, vinyl chloride resin, and etc. (p. 9) (the polymers read on a random polymer). The second ink is a water-based ink containing a colorant (A), a polymer (B), an organic solvent (C), and water. The colorant (A) is a white pigments such as titanium oxide, zinc oxide, silica, alumina, magnesium oxide, and the like (p. 8). The polymer (B) can be used as the polymer dispersant and the polymer of the water-insoluble polymer. An Example of polymer (B) include styrene butadiene resin (p. 9) (styrene butadiene resin reads on a block copolymer). Regarding claim 13, MATSUMOTO teaches the inkjet recording method for recording a first ink and a second ink wherein the first ink and the second ink are water-based inks each containing a colorant (A), a polymer (B), an organic solvent (C), and water. An image is formed with at least one first ink and then superimposing the second ink on at least part of the formed image, a background image is formed (Abstract; pp. 3-4). Double Patenting The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on non-statutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a non-statutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based e-Terminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An e-Terminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about e-Terminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 12, and 13 are rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 2, 7, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 12,516,209. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because of the reasons given below. US ‘209 claims an ink set comprising a colored ink comprising a colored pigment which is at least one chromatic pigment or a black pigment, a pigment dispersant, and water; and a white ink comprising a white pigment, a pigment dispersed, and water, wherein the pigment dispersant in the white ink comprises a polymer having a crosslinked structure or a block polymer, and wherein the pigment dispersant in the colored ink comprises a polymer having structural unites derived from an ethylenically unsaturated compound having an aromatic ring structure or an alicyclic structure, and having a crosslinked structure. The inkset according to claim 1, wherein the pigment dispersant in the white comprises the block copolymer. The inkset according to claim 1, further comprising a pretreatment liquid comprising an aggregating agent. An image recording method that uses the ink set according to claim 11, the method comprising: applying the colored ink onto an impermeable base material; and applying the white ink onto a colored ink film formed by the application of the colored ink. US ‘209 encompasses the scope of the present invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEVE V HALL whose telephone number is (571)270-7738. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9 am-5 pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at (571) 272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DEVE V. HALL Primary Examiner Art Unit 1763 /DEVE V HALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600670
PRECAST CONCRETE MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595360
ROOFING COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING LINEAR LOW-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593848
TRANSPARENT ANTIVIRAL/ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595319
RUBBER COMPOSITION AND PNEUMATIC TIRE USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595354
METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF A POLYCARBONATE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 902 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month