Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/364,379

GENERATING FAST AND GUARANTEED REPORTS FOR RETENTION LOCKED FILES IN A BACKUP SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Examiner
BLACK, LINH
Art Unit
2163
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Dell Products L.P.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 10m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
222 granted / 437 resolved
-4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 10m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
477
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 437 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/31/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-5, 7-13, 15-20 are pending in the application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/31/2025 have been fully considered. Regarding the arguments in relating to the amended limitations in claims 1-5, 7-13, and 15-10, please see below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 11 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: The claims state in the renaming step, “copying the RLA log file”. The claim does not specify where “the RLA log file” is being copied and the specification did not provide a good answer and/or whether the system copies said RLA log file to the hidden directory structure or not. Therefore, the claims are vague. Claims 2-5, 7-10, 12-13, 15-17, and 19-20 are rejected for incorporating the errors of claims 1, 11, and 18 by dependency. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Regen et al. (US 20240281338) teaches at para. 32, 36: the backup file attribution system may further generate an immutability feature for each of the files comprising the generated or determined backup file attribution, such that each of these files will remain immutable (e.g., will not be deleted, modified, overwritten, moved, removed, and/or the like). Further, and in some embodiments, the backup file attribution system may generate a report (e.g., a backup file report) comprising each of the file identifiers for each of the files determined to be a backup (e.g., comprising a backup file attribution), such that the file may be quickly recalled, such as when an attack on the original file is detected. Shaik (US 20230045034) teaches at para. 25: data retention settings; para. 28: an object lock enabled. Potyraj et al. (US 20220334929) teaches at para. 132: data protection techniques can include, for example, data archiving techniques that cause data that is no longer actively used to be moved to a separate storage device or separate storage system for long-term retention; para. 232: generating reports. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LINH BLACK whose telephone number is (571)272-4106. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tony Mahmoudi can be reached on 571-272-4078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LINH BLACK/Examiner, Art Unit 2163 9/26/2025 /TONY MAHMOUDI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2163
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 21, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jul 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602376
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA CURATION IN A DOCUMENT PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12530339
DISTRIBUTED PLATFORM FOR COMPUTATION AND TRUSTED VALIDATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12468835
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SESSION-AWARE DATASTORE FOR THE EDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12461923
SUITABILITY METRICS BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL SENSOR DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Patent 12450239
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING SEARCH RETRIEVAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+27.3%)
4y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month