Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/364,518

DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING A MOBILE NETWORK EXPERIENCE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 03, 2023
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
352 granted / 424 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
468
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 424 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed on 1/7/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 5, 17 and 21-29 remain pending in the application. Applicant’s amendments to drawing and Claims have overcome each and every objection and 112(b) rejections previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed on 1/7/2026. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments on pages 6-7 with respect to claims 1, 17 and 26 have been considered but are moot upon a further consideration and a new ground of rejection made under 35 USC 112(b). Claims 5, 21-25, 27-29 are rejected because of the dependency on claims 1, 17 and 26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 17 and 26 recite the limitations " … estimate, based on the network KPI data and using the trained machine learning model, …”. However, there are two trained machine learning models within the claims, such as the first trained machine learning model and the second trained machine learning model, and it is not clear if the limitation ‘the trained machine learning model’ indicates the first trained machine learning model or the second trained machine learning model, thereby renders the scope of the claims unascertainable and indefinite. The Appropriate correction is required. Claims 1, 17 and 26 focuses on estimating a network experience score and a network experience grade for at least one mobile application using trained machine learning models and KPI (Key Performance Indicator). However, Claims 1, 17 and 26 fails to present the limitation of practical application of estimated network experience score and network experience grade so that it is not clear how merely estimating a network experience score and a network experience grade improves the technology of the computer networking environment. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 03, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587409
A2B CABLE LENGTH DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581318
NETWORK TOPOLOGY FOR EFFICIENT AND PERFORMANT VIRTUAL WANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574978
METHODS FOR CONNECTION ORIENTED DATA TRANSFER FOR ULTRA-WIDEBAND SYSTEMS AND APPARATUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563428
METHOD FOR SHARING MEASUREMENT GAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557167
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INACTIVE STATE INITIAL UPLINK TRANSMISSION USING PRE-CONFIGURED GRANT AT A BASE STATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month