Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/366,144

Holding Device for an Electrical Energy Store Integrated into the Frame Tube of an Electric Bicycle

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 07, 2023
Examiner
WEHRLY, CHRISTOPHER B
Art Unit
3611
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
100 granted / 194 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
224
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 194 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 2, 4, 5, 7-16, and 18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 1/2/26 (hereinafter Response). Examiner notes that although Applicant takes the position in the Response that claims 2 & 4 are included in the elected Species, the Specification does not make this clear. Regarding claim 2, the ability of the electrical energy storage to not include a housing appears to be unique to the species where the holding device is a foam. See [0012] of Applicant’s originally filed Specification. Regarding claim 4, although the elected species includes the elastic web 78, it is unclear how the elastic web could be considered to “attenuate transmission of force between the frame tube and the electrical energy store and compensate[] for manufacturing tolerances” as claimed in claim 4. Instead, and as disclosed in [0009] the embodiments capable of attenuating transmission of force appear to be those where the elastic element is an elastomer, e.g., the elastomeric ring of Figs. 4a-4b and Fig. 14. See [0009], [0044], [0047], and [0079] of Applicant’s originally filed Specification. Applicant's election with traverse of Species XII (Fig. 13) in the Response is acknowledged. The traversal is on the grounds that there is no examination or search burden in searching and examining the various patentably distinct species/holding devices because the search terms/queries and classifications are likely to be the same/similar. This is not found persuasive because as stated in the Restriction Requirement: “There is a search and/or examination burden for the patentably distinct species as set forth above because at least the following reason(s) apply: --the species or groupings of patentably indistinct species have acquired a separate status in the art in view of their different classification; --the species or groupings of patentably indistinct species have acquired a separate status in the art due to their recognized divergent subject matter; and/or --the species or groupings of patentably indistinct species require a different field of search (e.g., searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search strategies or search queries).” For example, the search strategies or queries directed toward the elected “snap hook” embodiment is quite different from those that would be employed to search for the non-elected species where holding device includes an adhesive element. Further the classification is different because the particular classes for the differing holding elements is different. For example, the elected snap hook field of search includes F16B21/06 - releasable fastening devices with snap-action, which would not be included in the field of search for the non-elected adhesive holding element species. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: [0078] states in part “The web 78 of the snap hook 76 is preferably designed to be parallel to the longitudinal axis of the frame tube 3. By preloading the snap hooks 78, they can exert a radial force upon the electrical energy store 4.” This should be amended to instead recite: “The web 78 of the snap hook 76 is preferably designed to be parallel to the longitudinal axis of the frame tube 3. By preloading the snap hooks [[78]]76, they can exert a radial force upon the electrical energy store 4. FIG. 13 shows an advantageous combination with a radial stop 53. Alternatively, the holding device 5 can also be combined with one of the aforementioned embodiments of a holding device 5.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 6, 17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2020/0247502 A1 to Mitsuyasu et al (hereinafter Mitsuyasu). Regarding claim 1, Mitsuyasu discloses an electric bicycle (10) (Fig. 1 & Abstract) comprising: an electric drive (80) (Fig. 2 & [0136]); at least one frame tube (16A,72) having an interior in which a receiving portion (16S) is arranged (Fig. 2 & [0143]); an electrical energy store (40) arranged in the interior (16S) of the at least one frame tube (16A,72) and configured to be received by the receiving portion (16S) (Fig. 2 & [0143]); and a holding device (50) configured to establish a connection between the electrical energy store (40) and the frame tube (16A,72) and to fix the electrical energy store (40) in the interior (16S) to the frame tube (16A,72) (Figs. 18-19 & [0182]-[0185]), the holding device (50) having no electrical contacts (44A) (Figs. 2, 23 & [0188] disclose the electrical contacts for the battery are located on the end), wherein the holding device (50) fixes the electrical energy store (40) in the frame tube (16A,72) at least by a radial force and the holding device (50) is connected to the electrical energy store (40) without a screw connection (Figs. 18-19 & [0182]-[0185] disclose the biasing portions 50 are biased radially outward into and when engaged into holes, e.g., 74C restrict movement of the battery 40.). Regarding claim 3, depending on claim 1, Mitsuyasu further discloses wherein the holding device (50) is connected to the frame tube (16A,72) without a screw connection (Figs. 18-19 & [0182]-[0185]). Regarding claim 6, depending on claim 1, Mitsuyasu further discloses wherein the frame tube (16A,72) has an axial stop and/or radial stop (62) (Figs. 2, 18, 22 & [0145] and [0186] disclose the stop 62 can restrict movement of the battery in the axial, e.g., G1, and radial direction, e.g., “a direction intersecting the longitudinal direction of the frame.”). Regarding claim 17, depending on claim 1, Mitsuyasu further discloses wherein the holding device (50) comprises a snap hook (50) that fixes the electrical energy store (40) ([0181]-[0185] disclose the engagement portions 48A are biased radially outward and engage in holes 74C; as shown in the figures and discussed the biasing portions are interpreted as snapping and hooking into the holes.). Regarding claim 17, depending on claim 1, Mitsuyasu further discloses an electrical conductor (96) connecting the electrical energy store (40) to the electrical drive (80) (Figs. 2 and 23 & [0188]). Conclusion See the 892 for prior art made of record and not relied upon that is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER B WEHRLY whose telephone number is (303)297-4433. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30 - 4:30 MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu can be reached at (571) 272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER B WEHRLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599109
DUALLY DRIVE WHEEL ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600430
A TORQUE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY, A TORQUE SUPPORT DEVICE, A WHEEL SECURING DEVICE, A REAR AXLE ASSEMBLY AND A BICYCLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583551
CARGO BICYCLE CONVERSION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570115
OFFSET MULTI-POINT UNDER BED HITCH MOUNTING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559197
ELECTRIC BICYCLE DRIVE UNIT FASTENING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+33.2%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 194 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month