Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/366,315

ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTORECEPTOR, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 07, 2023
Priority
Feb 02, 2023 — JP 2023-014866
Examiner
EVANS, BOONE ALEXANDER
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
147 granted / 229 resolved
-0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
250
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.3%
+53.3% vs TC avg
§102
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 229 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The tables disclosed in paragraphs [0059], [0079]-[0080], and [0084] are blurry and difficult to read. Applicant’s cooperation is respectfully requested in identifying and replacing any other blurry tables/figures not listed above, along with a statement that any amendments contain no new matter. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-4, 7-8, 10-11, 14-15 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Qi et al. (US PGP 2005/0233235 A1). PNG media_image1.png 124 532 media_image1.png Greyscale Qi teaches a photoconductive member containing a substrate, a photogenerating layer, a charge transport layer, an optional hole blocking layer or undercoat layer, and a cured overcoat layer comprised of a crosslinked siloxane composite containing a caprolactone-siloxane copolymer group represented by Formula (I) below ([0007]): In the crosslinked siloxane composite represented by Formula (I) above, R1 and R2 are taught to represent an aryl, an alkyl having 1 to 6 carbons, or a vinyl, and R” is taught to represent divalent linkage or a linking organic group. Divalent linkage examples of R” are taught to be selected from alkylenes having 1 to 30 carbon atoms and arylenes having from 6 to 30 carbon atoms ([0032], claim 3). PNG media_image2.png 126 512 media_image2.png Greyscale A specific example of the crosslinked siloxane composite is taught to be represented by Formula (II) below ([0033]): The crosslinked siloxane composite represented by Formula (II) above reads on the resin (X) having a unit represented by Formula (X1) recited in instant claim 1. The molecular weight of the block copolymer represented by Formula (II) is taught to be from about 5,700 to about 6,900 ([0035]) (which reads on the corresponding limitations recited in instant claim 3 and claim 4). Additionally, the content of the block copolymer represented by Formula (II) is taught to be present in an amount of from 0.1 to about 30 weight percent ([0048]) (which overlaps with the corresponding range recited in instant claim 7). PNG media_image3.png 214 392 media_image3.png Greyscale In embodiments, the overcoat layer is taught to further include a hole transport component represented by the following formula IV-a: The hole transport component represented by formula IV-a above is a reactive group-containing charge transport material containing a reactive group (-OH) and a charge-transporting skeleton (triarylamine) in the same molecule (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 1). The photoconductive member is taught to be used in methods of imaging and printing which involve the formation of an electrostatic latent image on the imaging member, followed by the developing of the image with a toner composition, transferring the image to a suitable substrate, and affixing the image thereto ([0064]) (which include the corresponding components recited in instant claim 8, claim 10, claim 11, claim 14, claim 15, claim 17 and claim 18). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 2, 9, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Qi et al. (US PGP 2005/0233235 A1), in view of Kuroiwa et al. (US PGP 2020/0124996 A1). The teachings of Qi are discussed above and incorporated herein. Qi appears to be silent to teach or suggest the use of a curing agent containing a guanamine compound or a melamine compound. Kuroiwa teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member including a surface layer being a cured film of a composition containing at least one compound selected from a guanamine compound and a melamine compound ([0068]). The use of the guanamine compound and/or the melamine compound as curing agent(s) is taught to impart appropriate hydrophobicity to the surface layer, promote crosslinking of the coating film, and improve solubility ([0071], [0088]) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have utilized the guanamine compound and/or a melamine compound of Kuroiwa as the curing agent in Qi’s overcoat layer, in view of adjusting the hydrophobicity and improving the crosslinking of the overcoat layer. Claims 1-2, 5, 8-9, 12, 15-16, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murakami et al. (US PGP 2015/0056547 A1), in view of Kuroiwa et al. (US PGP 2020/0124996 A1). Murakami teaches a method of producing an electrophotographic photosensitive member including: preparing a solution including a charge transport substance and at least one compound selected from the group consisting of a fluorine-atom-containing polyacrylate, a fluorine-atom-containing polymethacrylate, a polycarbonate having a siloxane bond, a polyester having a siloxane bond, a polystyrene having a siloxane bond, a silicone oil, a polyolefin, an aliphatic acid, an aliphatic acid amide, and an aliphatic acid ester; dispersing the solution in water to prepare an emulsion; forming a coat for the charge transporting layer by using the emulsion; and heating the coat to form the charge transporting layer ([0018]). The electrophotographic photosensitive member is taught to include a support, a charge generating layer, a charge transporting layer, and a protective layer (second charge transporting layer) ([0023]-[0024]). A process cartridge comprising the components recited in instant claim 8, claim 9, and claim 12, and an image forming apparatus comprising the components recited in instant claim 15, claim 16, and claim 19 are also discussed ([0137]-[0142]). The charge transporting substance is taught to be a substance having a hole transporting ability and includes triarylamine compounds or hydrazone compounds ([0025]). Murakami teaches that the coat of the emulsion may be formed on the first charge transporting layer to form the second charge transporting layer, or both the first and second charge transporting layers may be formed using the emulsion ([0107]). In other words, the protective layer is formed using the emulsion described above. PNG media_image4.png 274 364 media_image4.png Greyscale Examples of the polystyrene having a siloxane bond are taught to include a polystyrene D having a repeating structural unit represented by the following formula (4-1) and a repeating structural unit represented by the following formula (4-2): In the formula (4-1), m7 is taught to be an integer from 1 to 10 and m8 is taught to be an integer from 20 to 100 ([0064]). The repeating structural unit represented by formula (4-1) above reads on the formula (X1) recited in instant claim 1. PNG media_image5.png 212 360 media_image5.png Greyscale Examples of the polyolefin are taught to include aliphatic hydrocarbons ([0073]). Specific examples of the polyolefin are taught to include those represented by formulae (6-1) through (6-7), shown below: The repeating structural unit of the polyolefin represented by, for example, formula (6-1) reads on the formula (X2) recited in instant claim 1. The polystyrene having a siloxane bond including the repeating structural unit represented by formula (4-1) and the polyolefin represented by formula (6-1) are taught to be used in combination by mixing ([0084]). In other words, the resin formed in the coating liquid for the protective layer includes both a unit corresponding to the claimed formula (X1) and a unit corresponding to the claimed formula (X2) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 5). Murakami appears to be silent to teach that the charge transporting substance includes materials containing a reactive group. Murakami also appears to be silent to teach or suggest the use of a curing agent containing a guanamine compound or a melamine compound. Kuroiwa teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member including a surface layer being a cured film of a composition containing at least one compound selected from a guanamine compound and a melamine compound, and a charge transport material having at least one substituent selected from -OH, -OCH3, -NH2, -SH, and -COOH ([0068]) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 1). The use of the guanamine compound and/or the melamine compound as curing agent(s) is taught to impart appropriate hydrophobicity to the surface layer, promote crosslinking of the coating film, and improve solubility ([0071], [0088]) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 2). The charge transport material is taught to include reactive group(s) in view of increasing the crosslinking density of the film, thereby improving the strength of the coating layer. This reduces the rotation torque of the electrophotographic photosensitive member and reduces damage to the cleaning blade, thus promoting the longevity of the photosensitive member ([0092]). Examples of suitable charge transport materials are taught to include triarylamine compounds ([0093]-[0095]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have utilized the guanamine compound and/or a melamine compound of Kuroiwa in the coating liquid of Murakama’s protective layer, in view of adjusting the hydrophobicity and improving the crosslinking of the protective layer. It would have also been obvious to have used a charge transport compound having a reactive group, such as one of the triarylamine compounds taught by Kuroiwa, in view of improving the strength and longevity of the photosensitive member. Claims 1-2, 7-9, and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tanaka et al. (US PGP 2014/0205940 A1), in view of Kuroiwa et al. (US PGP 2020/0124996 A1). Tanaka teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member including a support, a charge generating layer, a charge transporting layer, and a surface layer containing a specific resin (β) being at least one resin selected from the group consisting of a polycarbonate resin having a siloxane structure at the end and an acrylic resin having a siloxane structure at the end, and a specific compound (γ) being at least one compound selected from the group consisting of propylene carbonate, γ-butyrolactone, δ-valerolactone, and ε-caprolactone ([0010]). A process cartridge comprising the components recited in instant claim 8, claim 9, and claim 14, and an image forming apparatus comprising the components recited in instant claim 15 and claim 16 are also discussed ([0114], [0128]). PNG media_image6.png 106 298 media_image6.png Greyscale The acrylic resin having a siloxane structure at the end is taught to be an acrylic resin F having a structural unit represented by the following formula (F-1) and a structural unit represented by the following formula (F-3) ([0056]): PNG media_image7.png 106 308 media_image7.png Greyscale The structural unit represented by formula (F-1) above reads on the claimed unit represented by formula (X1), and the structural unit represented by formula (F-3) above is sufficiently similar to the claimed unit represented by formula (X2)1 recited in instant claim 1. The content of the specific resin (β) is taught to be 0.1% by mass or more and 50% by mass or less, from the viewpoints of reduction in initial friction coefficient and suppression of the variation in bright portion potential due to repeated use ([0064]) (which overlaps with the corresponding range recited in instant claim 7). Tanaka appears to be silent to teach that the charge transporting substance includes materials containing a reactive group. Tanaka also appears to be silent to teach or suggest the use of a curing agent containing a guanamine compound or a melamine compound. Kuroiwa teaches an electrophotographic photosensitive member including a surface layer being a cured film of a composition containing at least one compound selected from a guanamine compound and a melamine compound, and a charge transport material having at least one substituent selected from -OH, -OCH3, -NH2, -SH, and -COOH ([0068]). The use of the guanamine compound and/or the melamine compound as curing agent(s) is taught to impart appropriate hydrophobicity to the surface layer, promote crosslinking of the coating film, and improve solubility ([0071], [0088]) (which reads on the corresponding limitation recited in instant claim 2). The charge transport material is taught to include reactive group(s) in view of increasing the crosslinking density of the film, thereby improving the strength of the coating layer. This reduces the rotation torque of the electrophotographic photosensitive member and reduces damage to the cleaning blade, thus promoting the longevity of the photosensitive member ([0092]). Examples of suitable charge transport materials are taught to include triarylamine compounds ([0093]-[0095]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have utilized the guanamine compound and/or a melamine compound of Kuroiwa in the coating liquid of Tanaka’s protective layer, in view of adjusting the hydrophobicity and improving the crosslinking of the protective layer. It would have also been obvious to have used a charge transport compound having a reactive group, such as one of the triarylamine compounds taught by Kuroiwa, in view of improving the strength and longevity of the photosensitive member. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 13, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Boone A Evans whose telephone number is (571)272-1420. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Huff can be reached on (571) 272-1385. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOONE ALEXANDER EVANS/Examiner, Art Unit 1737 03/18/2026 1 Tanaka’s formula (F-3) differs from the claimed formula (X2) in that e in formula (F-3) represents 0 or 1 whereas R204 in formula (X2) represents an alkyl group having 6 or more and 30 or less carbon atoms.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12656701
TONER AND METHOD OF PRODUCING TONER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650657
TONER AND TONER PRODUCING METHOD, TONER STORING UNIT, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12645161
ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTORECEPTOR, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12645160
SCRATCH-RESISTANT AND DURABLE ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTORECEPTOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638789
TONER AND TWO-COMPONENT DEVELOPER
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+25.3%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 229 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month