Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/366,450

IDENTIFIABLE PHYSICAL FORM, SALES INSTRUMENTS, AND INFORMATION MARKETPLACE FOR COMMODITY TRADES

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 07, 2023
Priority
Feb 02, 2018 — provisional 62/625,514 +4 more
Examiner
HA, STEVEN S
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Santeri Holdings LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
479 granted / 683 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
732
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
73.2%
+33.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 683 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims Applicant’s amendment field 9 February 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-3, 7-12, and 17-20 have been amended, claims 10-20 remain withdrawn, and claims 1-20 remain pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Singapore on 30 November 2018. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the Singapore application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the original identifiable unit" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 and 9 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 1: The prior art, either taken alone or in combination, fails to teach: injecting a second material into the unit of meltable material while the unit of meltable material is in liquid state to produce the identifiable unit having an exterior of the meltable material and containing the second material internally, the identifiable unit having a different density than that of the first unit of meltable material; cooling the identifiable unit of material to solid form while retaining the change in density; and recording the density of the identifiable unit so that the identifiable unit can be identified among other units also having an exterior of the meltable material but having a different density, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claim 1. Claims 2-7 and 9: Depend either directly or indirectly from claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN HA whose telephone number is (571)270-5934. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached at 571-272-3458 . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.S.H/Examiner, Art Unit 1735 11 June 2026 /KEITH WALKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 09, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683244
ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665213
STACK MODULE BOX IN CONNECTION WITH A PLURALITY OF MEDIA GUIDES LEADING TO THE STACK MODULE BOX, FUEL CELL DEVICE AND FUEL CELL VEHICLE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12623265
BRIDGING AN INTERRUPTION IN PRODUCTION IN A COMBINED CASTING-ROLLING INSTALLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12609360
LARGE CAPACITY SOLID STATE BATTERY
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12605760
LOW-PRESSURE CASTING APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 683 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month