Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/366,494

GLOVE HAVING DISCREET GRIPPING ZONES IN ONE OF THE PALM REGION AND WRIST REGION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 07, 2023
Examiner
PATEL, TAJASH D
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Summit Glove, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1266 granted / 1567 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1567 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The amendment and arguments filed on August 25, 2025 have been considered. In view of such the 112-2nd rejection has been withdrawn. However, the amendment has necessitated this office action to be made FINAL and the arguments are moot. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1- 14 and 17- 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seunevel (US 3,602,917) in view of Han (US 5,794,266). Seunevel discloses a glove including a wrist region, a palm region extending outwardly from the wrist region, a plurality of digit regions extending outwardly from the palm region, at least one gripping zone provided on at least one of the palm region and the wrist region of the glove as shown in figures 1 and 5. Further, the at least one gripping zone includes one or more concave indentations formed in a material of the glove and projecting into an interior cavity of the glove with one or more convex projections (01-012) alternating with the one or more arcuate concave indentions and extending outwardly from an exterior surface of the glove as shown in figures 1A, 6 and 9. Also, the at least one gripping zone is oriented orthogonally to an imaginary longitudinal axis of the glove, wherein the imaginary longitudinal axis extends from a tip of one of the plurality of digit regions to the palm region of the glove as shown in figures 5, 6 and 8. Furthermore, the plurality of digit regions includes a thumb region and wherein the at least one gripping zone is provided on the palm region between the thumb region and a bottom end of the wrist region and formed partially in a front of the palm region, partially in a first side of the palm region, and partially in a back of the palm region. as shown in figures 1-3. Also, the at least one gripping zone is formed partially in a front of the palm region, partially in a second side of the palm region, and partially in a back of the palm region as shown in figures 1-3, 1A, and 5-8. The plurality of digit regions includes a little finger region and the at least one gripping zone is provided on the palm region between the little finger region and a bottom end of the wrist region as shown in figures 1 and 3. In addition, the at least one gripping zone is formed partially in a front of the palm region, partially in a second side of the palm region, and partially in a back of the palm region as also shown in figures 1-3, 1A and 6-9. Additionally, the plurality of digit regions includes a thumb region and a little finger region, wherein the at least one gripping zone defines a first gripping zone and a second gripping zone wherein the first gripping zone is provided on the palm region between the thumb region and a bottom end of the wrist region and wherein the second gripping zone is provided on the palm region between the little finger region and the bottom end of the wrist region as shown in figures 1 and 3. The at least one gripping zone (14) comprises one or more gripping zones provided in the wrist region as shown in figures 1, 3 and 5, 6 and 8. The at least one gripping zone further includes a gripping zone (11) provided in the palm region longitudinally offset relative to the gripping zone and is laterally spaced therefrom the gripping zone provided in each of a front and a back portions of the glove as shown in figures 6- 9. However, Seunevel does not discloses a circumference of the glove passing through the at least one gripping zone is reduced relative to portions of the glove located longitudinally immediately adjacent the at least one gripping zone with a portion of the at least one gripping zone frictionally engaging the hand within an interior cavity. Han discloses a glove having a portion of at least one gripping zone with frictional elements/projections (16) to frictional engage the hand within an interior cavity, col. 2, lines 51-56 and as shown in figures 2 and 4. It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the glove of Seunevel substantially defines a circumference of the glove passing through the at least one gripping zone is reduced/tapered relative to end portions of the glove located longitudinally immediately adjacent the at least one gripping zone having a portion frictionally engaging the hand within an interior cavity as taught by Han in order to maintain the device fixed relative to the hand in order to prevents it from slipping/moving off or as known for particular application thereof. With regard to claim 18, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the at least one gripping zone with one or more arcuate concave indention which extends into the interior cavity made from a material of the glove of Seunevel in view of Han as shown in figure 1A can be defined but not limited to as one or more stays, etc. as known in the garment making art or as required for a particular application thereof. With regard to claims 13-14 and 19-20 , it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention that the glove of Seunevel when viewed with Han can include but not limited to a micro-etching texturing on an exterior surface, etc. for increased surface area for gripping as known in the glove making art or depending on end use thereof. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art reference cited on PTO-892 discloses a glove having gripping zone with a gripping portion formed on an inner surface thereof. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEJASH PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-4993. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton Ostrup can be reached at (571) 272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. December 7, 2025 /TAJASH D PATEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 25, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593885
SHOCK-ABSORBING ASSEMBLY AND BODY PROTECTION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593881
MOLLE RETENTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595606
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595607
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594894
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STITCHING A THREE DIMENSIONAL FORMED COMPONENT AND COMPONENTS FORMED FROM THE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month