Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/366,730

SOLID DISSOLVABLE COMPOSITIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 08, 2023
Priority
Aug 12, 2022 — provisional 63/397,409
Examiner
MRUK, BRIAN P
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Procter & Gamble Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
989 granted / 1332 resolved
+9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1369
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1332 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on May 20, 2026 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: In instant claim 6, the limitation “greater than 5%” should be amended to recite “greater than 5% by weight”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 6-10 and 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-4, 6-10 and 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, for containing the limitations “polyacrylate based materials” and “polyacrylate esters” in instant claims 1 and 18. These limitations render the claims vague and indefinite, since “polyacrylate esters” are inclusive of “polyacrylate based materials”. Claims 2-4, 6-10, 13-17 and 19-20 are included in this rejection for being dependent upon claims 1 and 18. Appropriate correction and/or clarification is required. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, for containing the limitations “active agent” and “active agent capsules”. Specifically, the examiner asserts that instant claim 1, from which claim 13 depends from, requires the active agent to be encapsulated. Accordingly, the unencapsulated “active agent” renders the claim vague and indefinite. Appropriate correction and/or clarification is required. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN P MRUK whose telephone number is (571)272-1321. The examiner can normally be reached on 7:00am-5:30pm Monday-Thursday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached on 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN P MRUK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 Brian P Mruk June 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Dec 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
May 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 22, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747419
SOLID DISSOLVABLE COMPOSITIONS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747409
SOLID DISSOLVABLE COMPOSITIONS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742135
Foam Formulations
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735379
COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING N-NONANOIC ACID ESTERS OF XYLITAN AND/OR SORBITAN
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729348
CLEANING LIQUID AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1332 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month