Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/368,041

MARALIXIBAT SOLID FORMS, INTERMEDIATES AND PROCESSES OF MAKING SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 14, 2023
Priority
Sep 14, 2022 — provisional 63/406,556
Examiner
DAHLIN, HEATHER RAQUEL
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allowance Rate
67 granted / 163 resolved
-18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+47.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
224
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 163 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority This Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/406,556, filed Sept. 14, 2022. Claim Status – Response to Restriction/ Election Claims 261-280 are currently pending. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group IV, claims 277-278 in the reply filed on March 12, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 277-278 are active and subject to examination. Claims 261-276 and 279-281 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.” Claim(s) 277-278 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mudipalli et al. (US20030199515A1). Claim 277 is a product-by-process claim directed towards a highly pure compound of Formula III, wherein the compound is prepared by a process comprising the step of converting a crystalline form of a compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate or solvate thereof, to a crystalline form of a compound of Formula II or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and wherein the purity of the compound of Formula III is at least about 90%. The compound of formula III has the following structure: PNG media_image1.png 185 360 media_image1.png Greyscale (claim 274). Mudipalli teaches crystalline forms of the compound of Formula III, wherein the compound of Formula III has a purity of at least 90%, specifically 99.7%: PNG media_image2.png 528 570 media_image2.png Greyscale Mudipalli, Specification, p. 47; PNG media_image3.png 680 542 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 199 518 media_image4.png Greyscale Id., p. 49. The patentability of a product-by-process claim is determined based on the patentability of the product, which does not depend on its method of production (MPEP § 2113). As the product of Mudipalli is the same as the product of claim 277, claim 277 is anticipated. Claim 278 is directed towards a compound of Formula III, wherein the compound is in crystalline Form II. Mudipalli teaches a compound of Formula III, wherein the compound is in crystalline Form II: PNG media_image5.png 746 656 media_image5.png Greyscale Mudipalli, Fig. 6. PNG media_image6.png 415 523 media_image6.png Greyscale Id., Fig. 12. Forms I and II disclosed by Mudipalli are the same Forms I and II as disclosed in the instant Application: PNG media_image7.png 456 794 media_image7.png Greyscale Instant Fig. 11; PNG media_image8.png 423 626 media_image8.png Greyscale Instant Fig. 13; PNG media_image9.png 455 755 media_image9.png Greyscale Instant Fig. 14; As shown in Mudipalli Fig. 6 and Instant Fig. 11, Mudipalli Form II and Instant Form II appear to be the same form because they have peaks in the same locations. Form II reference also appears to be the same form as the instant sample because the peak locations are substantially identical, seeming to be an admission by the Applicant of Form II in the prior art. Therefore, claim 278 is anticipated. Conclusion No claim is found to be allowable. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HEATHER DAHLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-0436. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Lundgren can be reached on (571) 272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 86-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HEATHER DAHLIN/Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 14, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 24, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729193
TRICYCLIC LIGANDS FOR DEGRADATION OF IKZF2 OR IKZF4
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12703686
4-METHOXY-2-PHENETHYL ISOINDOLINE-1-ONE DERIVATIVE AND COMPOSITION FOR TREATING NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES, COMPRISING SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698288
COMPOUNDS HAVING CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE(CDK)-INHIBITORY FUNCTION
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698268
DIHYDROISOQUINOLINONE AND ISOINDOLINONE DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698260
SOLID STATE FORM OF CENTANAFADINE HCL AND PROCESS FOR PREPARATION THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+47.5%)
3y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 163 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month