Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/368,057

LASER DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 14, 2023
Priority
Sep 20, 2022 — TW 111210218
Examiner
CARTER, MICHAEL W
Art Unit
2828
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
UNIKORN SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
635 granted / 854 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
884
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
86.1%
+46.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 854 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 8-10, and 14-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2015/0043601 (Hamaguchi). For claim 1, Hamaguchi teaches a laser device (fig. 1B), comprising: a stack of epitaxial layers having a central region and an edge region (fig. 1A, 22 and 23; [0073]; central region defined by opening 24A and edge region defined by 24) and comprising: a first reflective structure (fig. 1A, 42; [0063]); an active region disposed on the first reflective structure (fig. 1A, 23; [0063]); and a second reflective structure disposed on the active region (fig. 1A, 41; [0063]); a first conductive layer disposed on the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 21; [0070]), wherein the first conductive layer covers the central region and a part of the edge region of the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A); an intermediate layer having a first opening corresponds to the central region of the stack of epitaxial layers, wherein the intermediate layer comprises insulating material or metal (fig. 1A, 24 with opening 24A or alternatively 33 with opening below 24A); and a first electrode disposed on the first conductive layer (fig. 1A, 31, on left and right side of 41; [0063]). For claim 2, Hamaguchi teaches the first electrode has a second opening (fig. 1A between left and right portions of 31) corresponding to the first opening (fig. 1A, opening 24A). For claim 3, Hamaguchi teaches the first opening has a first width and the second opening has a second width different from the first width (fig. 1A). For claim 4, Hamaguchi teaches the second width of the second opening is greater than the first width of the first opening (fig. 1A). For claim 8, Hamaguchi teaches a substrate disposed under the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 26); and a second conductive layer disposed between the substrate and the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 32). For claim 9, Hamaguchi teaches a bonding layer disposed between the substrate and the second conductive layer (fig. 1A, 25; [0068]). For claim 10, Hamaguchi teaches an insulating layer (fig. 1A, 24) disposed between the second conductive layer (fig. 1A, 32) and the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 22 and 23), wherein the insulating layer has a third opening located directly under the central region of the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 24A). For claim 14, Hamaguchi teaches an optical layer disposed on the first conductive layer and located corresponding to the first opening (fig. 1A, second reflecting structure 41 be considered an optical layer on the first conductive layer). For claim 15, Hamaguchi teaches the optical layer is a multi- layer structure ([0066]). For claim 16, Hamaguchi teaches a laser device (fig. 1A), comprising: a substrate (fig. 1A, 26; [0068]); a stack of epitaxial layers disposed on the substrate (fig. 1A, 22 and 23; [0073]) and comprising: a first reflective structure (fig. 1A, 42; [0063]); a current confinement structure disposed on or within the first reflective structure, wherein the current confinement structure comprises a current conductive region (fig. 1A, 24 and opening region 24A); an active region disposed on the current confinement structure (fig. 1A, 23; [0063]); and a second reflective structure disposed on the active region (fig. 1A, 41; [0063]); a conductive layer disposed between the substrate and the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 33); a bonding layer disposed between the substrate and the conductive layer (fig. 1A, 25; [0068]); and a first electrode disposed on the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 1A, 31, on left and right side of 41; [0063]). For claim 17, Hamaguchi teaches the first electrode comprises an opening (fig. 1A between left and right portions of 31) corresponding to the current conductive region (fig. 1A, opening 24A). For claim 18, Hamaguchi teaches the opening has a fourth width and the current conductive region has a fifth width different from the fourth width (fig. 1A). For claim 19, Hamaguchi teaches the fourth width of the opening is larger than the fifth width of the current conductive region (fig. 1A). Claims 1 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2005/0100068 (Jikutani). For claim 1, Jikutani teaches a laser device (fig. 15-16; [0343]-[0352]), comprising: a stack of epitaxial layers having a central region and an edge region (fig. 15 and 16, 806c, 807, 806d; central region defined by non-oxide regions 813a and 813b and edge region defined by oxidized regions of 804 and 805) and comprising: a first reflective structure (fig. 15, 803); an active region disposed on the first reflective structure (fig. 15 and 16, 806c, 806d and 807); and a second reflective structure disposed on the active region (fig. 15, 808); a first conductive layer disposed on the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 15 and 16, 806e and 806f), wherein the first conductive layer covers the central region and a part of the edge region of the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 15 and 16); an intermediate layer having a first opening corresponds to the central region of the stack of epitaxial layers, wherein the intermediate layer comprises insulating material or metal (fig. 16, 804 with opening 813b); and a first electrode disposed on the first conductive layer (fig. 15, 815). For claim 6, Jikutani teaches the stack of epitaxial layers further comprises a current confinement structure between the active region and the second reflective structure (fig. 15-16, 805). For claim 7, Jikutani teaches the current confinement structure comprises a current conductive region (fig. 16, 183a) corresponding to the first opening and has a third width larger than the first width of the first opening (fig. 16 width 813a > width 813b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5, 11-15, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2015/0043601 (Hamaguchi) in view of US 2021/0075189 (Chang). For claim 5, 11, and 20 Hamaguchi does not teach the laser device comprises a plurality of the stack of epitaxial layers electrically connect to the first electrode. However, Chang teaches a similar laser device (fig. 3E and 4) comprising a stack of epitaxial layers having a central region and an edge region (fig. 3E, 50, 60, and 70 with central region above 40) and comprising: a first reflective structure (fig. 3E, 50); an active region disposed on the first reflective structure (fig. 3E, 60); and a second reflective structure disposed on the active region (fig. 3E, 70); an intermediate layer having a first opening corresponds to the central region of the stack of epitaxial layers, wherein the intermediate layer comprises insulating material or metal (fig. 3E, 30); and a first electrode (fig. 3E and 4, 80). Chang further teaches the laser device comprises a plurality of the stack of epitaxial layers (fig. 3 shows 3 stacks and fig .4 illustrates a large array of stacks) electrically connected to the first electrode (fig. 3E and 4, 80) in order to provide high power output with increased effective light emitting are and good heat dissipation ([0007]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Chang’s teaching of multiple stacks of epitaxial layers electrically connected to the first electrode with the device of Hamaguchi in order to provide high power output with increased effective light emitting are and good heat dissipation. For claim 12, Chang further teaches a second electrode, and the plurality of the stack of epitaxial layers electrically connect to the second electrode (fig. 3E and 4, 40; [0022]). For claim 13, Hamaguchi does not teach the active region has sidewalls and the intermediate layer encapsulates the sidewalls of the active region. However, Chang teaches a similar device where the active region (fig. 3E, 60) has sidewalls and the intermediate layer encapsulates the sidewalls of the active region (fig. 3E, 30) in order to form an array of VCSELs and high power output with increased effective light emitting are and good heat dissipation ([0007]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the encapsulation and array structure of Chang with the device of Hamaguchi in order to form an array of VCSELs and high power output with increased effective light emitting are and good heat dissipation. For claim 14, if the limitation of claim 14 is assumed to require an optical layer distinct from the second reflective structure, Chang teaches an optical layer (fig. 3E, 90) on the second reflective structure (fig. 3E, 70) corresponding to the first opening (fig. 3E, 40) in order to increase output ([0016]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the optical layer of Chang with the invention of Hamaguchi such that the optical layer is on the second reflective structure and by extension the first conductive layer of Hamaguchi in order to increase output. For claim 15, Chang does not teach the optical layer is a multi-layer structure. However, the examiner takes official notice that multi-layer anti reflection films were well-known in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use a well-known multi-layer anti reflection film as a simple substitution for the AR film of combination as the substituted components and their functions were known in the art and the substitution would have yielded predictable results. In the present case, the substituted component provides an alternative AR film. See MPEP 2143 I.B. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael W Carter whose telephone number is (571)270-1872. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MinSun Harvey can be reached at 571-272-1835. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michael Carter/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2828
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676452
INTEGRATED LIGHT RECEIVING AND EMITTING DEVICE COMBINED WITH CONTROL CIRCUIT WAFER AND METHOD THEREOF
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665393
LIGHT-EMITTING APPARATUS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665369
OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT FOR PULSE COMPRESSION OF A PULSED LASER BEAM, AND LASER SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658672
LASER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DRIVING A LASER SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658673
HIGH SPEED SPATIAL LIGHT MODULATOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+15.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 854 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month